fuccaneer If similar language is used in a Drive Download Agreement, then that risk is substantially passed onto the user.
So a user would not only pay the $9.99 for the original download, they would also have to pay legal fees and associated costs if SLR were sued for copyright infringement because of the user didnt get permission from the copyright holder. The user would also likely be on the hook for any monetary damages awarded to the third party.
Yeah I mean, no surprise. Its the porn industry afterall. How many times have you seen stuff ripped from one site up on another and you know damn well they did not get permission. Just a little amateur uploader on a bigger site. But with the slr drive, its really no different than how qbittorrent operates. Everything is ok and qbittorrent does not get shut down for allowing the "download of illegal content" because you are only supposed to download "legal content." Likely uploads will be heavily monitored by a third party, and your ISP emails you a copywrite infringement warning if a content creator sees the title to their video uploaded in DRIVE. Your ISP will give you a few passes, then they may cut your internet. On DRIVE though you may be streaming vs downloading, you still download a very very small file. Sometimes just a cookie, with bits worth of info. You have to inorder to initiate the 'streaming.' But you downloaded it. Maybe not the whole video, but the keythat granted you access. Yeah, so many have said just what you have: sorta, how can they legally do this? Just as you said, pass it on to you like other torrent platforms do.
Another side to it is they may make drive 100% locked down for "privacy of the user" which is not a bad idea. Who cares maybe I want to upload some non-porn just for fun or private family videos. IDK just saying. A third party would never know what I upload. But again I have no idea, its just another angle