SLR Drive Vision and Future

fuccaneer A copyright holder isn't going to go after all the users uploading copyrighted content, they will go after the service provider.

unlimited streaming only AI PT and Scripts

This really changes the value perspective a lot. Not having to worry about failed renders, or usage limits is a big deal. I'm now much more excited about SLR drive.

Still think the downloads should be 5€ max though. 10€ a scene for AI passthrough + script is already insanely expensive if you ask me. I would never use it at 20€ a scene, not even for my all time favorite scenes.

Hairsational You are right. Which is why its important to write yourself out of it if you are a service provider. The 'fine print' makes it someone elses problem if there is a problem

fenderwq

fenderwq unlimited streaming only AI PT and Scripts

where are you seeing that? And its worded kinda funky. "Only AI passthroug and scripts".. yeah I mean drive is designed for AI passthrough and scripts, what else would unlimited streaming be for?

Hairsational Yes, the third party studio would sue SLR directly, but the agreement the user would have signed would put them on the hook for any costs associated with SLR being sued by the third party studio (legal fees, damages, etc).

Also, neither the users nor SLR are likely to get sued for the mere uploading of copyright protected content--its the creation of the derivative works of AI PT and AI script and the distribution (downloading) that are the potentially copyright violating parts.

Again, I'm not in the legal field, so don't trust anything I have to say.

sogman doubleVR edited the topic original post above

"doublevr"#p95242 It's top priority to introduce 2TB storage for $29.99/mo 500GB Storage for $14.99/mo including some 30 monthly unlimited streaming only AI PT and Scripts. With an option for paid downloads like $9.99 per PT AI render or script

Gotcha thanks

re the copyright stuff, you guys are forgetting this is a private cloud, the videos are not shareable to anyone

It's not much different than people uploading copyrighted videos onto Google Drive or Dropbox (which has been a thing since forever). So long as they are not shared then there is likely no issue

jommy

fuccaneer Also, neither the users nor SLR are likely to get sued for the mere uploading of copyright protected content--its the creation of the derivative works of AI PT and AI script and the distribution (downloading) that are the potentially copyright violating parts.

I'll leave it at that because this has gone incredibly off-topic. Sorry to the OP.

I like that SLR is creative -

You try lots of new things, but for me they broadly fit into two categories

1 ) Your devs and team are having fun and pushing the boundaries. Our membership "investment" in SLR ends up with new impressive features and of course a steady stream of new content

2 ) Your marketing people are brainstorming about how to get more money because your regular subscribers /members are not providing you with enough money.

I am a big fan of (1), but I feel there are a lot of things you come up with which are 100% in category (2), Weaning us onto some new "value add" product and bleeding us like we are trapped pigs in a factory farm

I dont use anything but the most vanilla streaming in DeoVR (with downloads), but I do get concerned when I read that there will be a new tier, or that something super-basic like bluetooth support will be dropped

fuccaneer Yes, the third party studio would sue SLR directly, but the agreement the user would have signed would put them on the hook for any costs associated with SLR being sued by the third party studio

And how do you think SLR gets the users to pay for the lawyers? If another VR porn company sued SLR over copyright then you think SLR will sue everybody that put videos on the cloud?
I'm not saying that they will get sued but I don't see how they would ever get the customers to pay for the defence team.

ameteala I wonder the same @doublevr

doublevr do we get anymore credits for beta?