POV vs Non-POV

Even though I love both, and would wish for more non pov content, I see some difficulties here.

1. Keeping it non-pov, the directors prefer to keep the cam moving which is great tbh but is limiting with the cameras and equipment they could choose. That's why a lot of lower quality 5k and 6k content is produced.
2. Those using toys might not prefer the non pov view. Have noticed this quite often in comments.
3. Moving cam needs perfect stability. A few studios do it right but quite often they do mess up. And it's another piece of equipment that eats up their budget. Most have this jitter or sudden movement, that would throw off a lot of users.
4. Lens focus/sharpness is a big issue even for fixed pov scenes. Heck SLRO had its fair share of issues.
   For fixed non-pov, the models keep moving a lot with positions, etc. It gets tricky for the director to keep everyone in focus i guess.
   Gets worse with focus issues if it's a moving cam non-pov scene.

Studios are picking the low hanging fruit here, so understandable seeing so much of pov content.
Give it time, it'll grow as the vr space grows.

alphaRonaldo Those using toys might not prefer the non pov view.

I watch nonpov with a torso, dreamcam channel...watching them fuck as I fuck my torso, it's like we all fucking

I enjoy it all! Pov nonpov!
I'm ready for the freakoff parties! "Orgies"

Yall never seen them short vr films in amazedvr on gearvr? I use to watch these and think wow if they had some sex in these films would be great.

Bro eventually, or they doing it now but more movies will be made in vr, "nonpov"

Reps, that's how nonpov improves, gotta just film it, it'll get better as we go.

Jaysmart1432 How do the numbers stack up against the POV scenes they shoot? That will be the big decider for the studios

"Non-POV kinda sucks IMO unless you're into cuckold stuff. There's nothing "virtually real" about sitting in a corner watching other people bang."
HughMungus The second sentence contradicts the first. You are virtually really getting cucked. I think this is true of all 3rd person porn, including flat, people just don't notice because flat doesn't feel real.
First time I saw a voyeur VR scene I removed the headset within seconds because of the strong emotional response (being scared/uncomfortable) I had. It's similar to getting sexually assaulted I guess.
Now that I'm more used to it I can watch a scene like that and I can enjoy it if I'm in the mood. But it is inherently submissive to be made to watch the sex instead of having it yourself. And I usually want to fuck the female talent myself after a while so I check if there's POV content by her as well before I start so I can switch to that when the urge to become active gets too much.
I think the amount of voyeur VR is just right for the amount of people that want it. I understand that the (English) acting from Euro studios is not great and I'd actually prefer if they were just speaking their native tongues, as I don't need to understand what they're saying, emotion expressed in the acting still translates. Also true for POV actually.
But voyeur is just not large enough a market to sustain higher quality content. Just support what is there, like Jack & Jill.

HughMungus

it allows you to see the girls from head to toe in action instead of a closeup of nipples in your face, arm pits and vr cosplaying the role of some random dude the whole scene, etc., nonPOV more akin to sitting a few feet back and watching a ballet dancer do her thing, pornographically speaking, and as many have said literally like watching the porn we've been watching for decades but it's more like you're there... what's not to like? In the real world yeah, I'm sure most people prefer 1-on-1, but this is erotic escapism, and not like you have to go shouting from the rooftops what you like on VR, nobody will know. regardless if it's pov or nonpov it's not your dick in the scene so unless you can transcendental your way out of conscious thought that fact will always be present. i think there is room for both and think a nice variety would help vr grow as not everybody is into the same thing.

doublevr

not sure what you mean by nobody knows how to do it right, as I've seen several nonPOV scenes on SLR that look great to me.

The biggest factor for my enjoyment, is how natural/real the performance is.
I don't like when it feels cold and artificial, no matter the perspective, no matter the actors... That's why before VR, I didn't watch many professional vids, I always went to amateur/homemade videos on the hub and other sites that were recorded by real couples and that showed real passion...

Thing with POV is it limits this, as in order to record POV, the male actor has to lay like a mannequin, not interacting much, there is always something separating them in the middle.

So, in Non-Pov, the actors have a chance to display real passion and have fun, which is what i look for... But it's not a guarantee, there's lot of terrible performances in NonPov.

The upgrade I look forward to with NonPov, which we are already starting to see a little bit of, is real couples having fun, videos with that "Homemade" vibe... Here's two recent examples :

https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/cuckold-experience-hot-wife-gets-creampied-by-a-latin-stud-51991
and
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/husband-perspective-hotwife-and-friend-hook-up-with-college-buddy-51298

I think NonPov is better suited for "Homemade amateur content" because it's just easier to record and doesen't get in the way of the couple, just like in the beginning of the homemade porn boom, couples just bought a camera and set it to a good enough angle and performed... And it absolutely dominated the porn scene for years to come because people value authenticity.

If I had the money to make a campaign to grow VR porn, I would go to onlyfans solo models and couples and invite them to SLR, giving them a camera for free, making it as convenient for them to record as possible, and NonPov is more conventient and easy than POV, you can even record flatscreen+VR in parallel like what cam models do...

I think there is a lot of untapped potential in VR porn because of how it is currently perceived by outsiders(simulation device). Just like VR videos used to be needleslly stuck with having to be 360 a few years ago, because of that same simulation ideal.

Thankfully we left part of that in the past, and moved on to high quality 180 degrees videos, and now 360 are much less popular. If VR video watching goes mainstream the same thing might happen with POV/NonPov, not just in porn but in general.
And in a small way I can already see it when I look at DEOVR SFW videos, the creators there already see this coming, they record 180 videos in a very similar style to regular flatscreen videos you would see on youtube.
However as all technology goes, porn is usually the spearhead, and so its VR Porn responsibility to bring in more people to try VR videos in general.

Majority VR porn POV videos (what we have now)
= Outsiders perceive VR porn as a simulation device, instead of watching a performance you wear it and actively pretend you are having sex with the images you see.

Majority VR porn NonPov videos (what we don't have now)
= Outisders perceive VR porn as an upgrade to flatscreen, you are still watching but with depth and higher quality.

My crazy theory is that the majority of people that watch porn, just want to watch porn... They don't want to have sex with the video.
And I'm not saying that when watching POV you have to do that, I am not judging POV,
it's just how it is perceived by outsiders, since it's the most produced and advertised.

Jaysmart1432 There's plenty of room for both POV and Non-POV!!!

Slr mentioned years ago they were thinking about filming nonpov as extra clips from scenes they produced, so far they only did 1
Hopefully we can visit this idea again, I was looking forward to it too!

Hey I bet these directors have a stash of nonpov content from scenes they produced, probably have bloopers and all kinds of extra content that I'd like to see. I'm pretty sure there's a huge vault, lol upload it! It's content!

One rule I'd like to suggested for non pov, is back me up, the close ups are fine, but don't keep me up close for to long, especially during the whole sex action, also don't worry about blurriness if u backing up to far, and ur worried it's going look blurry, don't worry, just scoot me back enough where you fill its good and take 3 more steps back again, lol...oh and less camera movement when walking with cam filming sex, it's OK it's fine you move around, just do lil less during sex.

Also when doing any up close oral, upclose sucking tittys,, ass eating, upclose arm pit munching, kissing get some shoots in close as possible

Wonder what it be like to film nonpov but koalavr style with headcam on, I'd like to see that one day.

More nonpov!
Tadpole does great non pov and books familiar vr hotties too, send them some beefy studs bro to wreck shop!

Pornodan does good work too but they refuse to get better camera for better quality.

There's actually quite a bit nonpov but its lacking booking our favorite vr pov hotties!

Bro I wonder if directors like the idea of producing more non pov, probably gives them room for more creativity.

I'm here for it! Nonpov!
Yall see me saying more pt or talking about pt like i use too? Pt guy lol ptgang , no cuz there's so much of it in a short time, do more nonpov, and I'll lol

More nonpov will be fun!

Vrsumo2017 Tadpole does great non pov
Vrsumo2017 Pornodan does good work too

Jaysmart1432 This proves my original point. In most of these scenes it's a 2:1 ratio so based in this, for every 2 POV scenes there should be 1 Non-POV. Unfortunately this is not the case.

I do not think this proves your point at all. I think the opposite.
I guessing 1 out of every 10 videos is NON POV maybe less. It gets half or less of the views as POV. So if you make even more NON then you have the same amount of people that like NON but now they are watching different videos which just brings down the numbers for every NON video.

Same thing is going to happen to PT videos. Right now SLR makes one a week so if there are 20 new videos a day that is 140 regular to 1 PT a week. If 500,000 views happen in a week over all videos and 40,000 people like PT. SLR puts out 1 PT scene then it gets 40,000 views. Some people believe that shows that it is somehow the most popular type of VR because it got the most views. But that is not what the numbers mean. It might mean there is room for more PT but as you add more PT videos then the numbers per video are going to go DOWN.

Same for NON. There are NON videos now that @fuccaneer shows the numbers. If you add more then each will receive less. Making it less and less profitable. That is supple and demand 101

non poverty with a fixed camera is almost as boring as povery.
just move the camera around is it that much to ask?