Quest 3 announced

Vrsumo2017

spanker will a NEW update here make our controllers like before...where the joy stick lets up LOOK up and down vs making it close and far.

You go to the settings at the deo menu, look for player controls and look for "pitch" in the list, click on it and press up and then click the green check

spanker

sorry...i REMEMBER getting to SEE the green check the very first day looking at all this...before bringing it up...mighta got too excited, as i can't seem to get the green check to appear again over the last two days or times in SLR

luckily been busy seeing other things...NEW(to me) JAV site (no ESG....so all the crazy shit we're used to)...with little section of non-pixilated clips on the page. in three D...i would be going frigging blind, but only that looks great with q3

spanker

TY 🙂

Vrsumo2017

OliverDK horizontal off set is in the image options in case you can't find it.

You gonna want to use the + and - instead to the slider.

So example
If the model looks to small, go to horizontal off set and click + one time, look at the model, still to small? Click the + again. That works for me.

I use pt for the scale too for regular vrp, if it looks to small or big, I turn on pt and I use falloff in the pt options and adjust the scale with horizontal offset and then turn pt off. Move the "fall off" to the left so the video is transparent.

sylvan

Vrsumo2017 hello; when I find the character too small: I use the zoom instead (I didn't see any difference with horizontal OFF set ): or am I wrong?

Vrsumo2017

spanker i kept seeing 2160 and found the area to change this...BUT what to change it to?

You talking about switching from 4k to 8k?

When you watching a video on the player on the left corner of it there's different numbers you can select, the top # is the highest, just click on them what ever one you like just leave it there.

spanker

just let me know where to ship off the money....TY 🙂

Vrsumo2017

Lol, I dare one of yall to try the pt outdoors

Lol get sum seated cg rcg action outback.
And then back to your room for laying cg rcg 👍

Vrsumo2017

sylvan horizontal off set works by spreading both left and right image outwards or inwards,

Outwards would be to make it bigger that wouod he the +
Inward would be to make it smaller that would be -

It works for me.
What exactly are you doing?

theHobbit

so I found a black dead pixel on my Quest 3 and I can't unsee it because its right in my eye line and my eyes keep focussing on it. I am returning it and getting another one. Anybody else get a similar issue with theirs?

petermc

theHobbit not noticed any issue with mine yet. There is a YouTube review earlier in the thread or maybe the thread in POVR forum where the reviewer had a dead pixel so maybe it’s a common fault.

Vrsumo2017

petermc

Ventriloquist_Tacos everyone’s entitled to their opinion obviously but I couldn’t disagree more with this. Nothing ruins a scene more for me than the camera giving me a view that is physically impossible to achieve in real life. It completely throws me out of the scene if it feels like my dick is 6 inches below my chin. Realistic distance and scale are more important to me than crystal clear visuals. Ideally we should be getting both though.

You can achieve close up shots realistically in cowgirl and missionary but doggy style, blow jobs etc should be a realistic distance from the average person’s eyeline. That’s my opinion anyway, each to his own though.

sylvan

Vrsumo2017 in fact as I always find women too small, I use the zoom: it makes them bigger

Vrsumo2017

Ventriloquist_Tacos but they should quickly transition those closer to the woman's face/body.

You mean the camera closer to the models face and body or the model get her face and body close to the camera?

Example
During Standing doggy the model arches up towards the camera in a kinda standing position looking back at the camera and you can see her tits looking over her shoulders cuz she closer to the cam.

Far away missionary, the model is laying but she can sit up in a sitting position holding on to guys ass cheeks while her face is closer the camera

Laying cg the model can lean in to the camera for face to face cg while her tits are squished on his chest or her tits are up close to the camera.

Laying rcg the model leans back closer to the cam with sum eye contact.

I'm just wondering, are yall suggesting the camera be closer or the models should get closer.

I want the kisses closer to the cam as possible, sometimes the model to far, also 69's sometimes they're to far from the cam, the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER! 🤦‍♂️ LOL.

SchnuppiLilac

Vrsumo2017 the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER! 🤦‍♂️ LOL.

Happens all the time 😃

petermc

Vrsumo2017 my understanding was that he was saying the camera should move closer so you could really zoom in close on a blowjob rather than watch it from a realistic distance.

I’ve no issue with models leaning in closer, that’s totally different. The doggy style thing you mention where she kneels up and leans back is fine but I wouldn’t want the whole doggy section shot like that. I’m an ass guy so I like to see the girls ass too and doggy is the best position for that when the girl is fully bent over, face down, ass up!

Ventriloquist_Tacos

Vrsumo2017 Standing doggy is always too high up and far away IMO. 90% of the pixels are devoted to the background and 10% to the woman's body. Starting the camera from a lower height would resolve this. The problem with trying to replicate a "real life distance" with the cam position is the actual effect isn't equivalent. It's more distant, like Im a 7 foot 8 NBA player without glasses having sex with a woman "way down there". Requiring a zoom-in, once again, ruins image quality, at least at the current 8k max.

The same concept above applies to standing missionary.

There also needs to be more ass closeups, eye level gaping shots during anal too down by her ass. And closeups at the end with the facials. The cum play example I always refer to as the gold standard is the Freya Von doom SLR 8k scene, but for whatever reason, they choose not to replicate that.

Overall, somehow flat porn has figured out a way to be dynamic and compelling, but most of VR misses this by its obsession with "accurate POV".

While I don't have as high of opinion of their video quality as I used to (its okay though), Czech VR probably does the best in terms of that dynamism and closeup thing I'm talking about.

doorsareopen

After a couple days with q3, couple quick observations, not night and day but image quality definitely a little bit better. For me the increased fov really does wonders. Not a whole lot more than q2 but that extra little bit gives you a better perspective of the surroundings and and you are able to judge things like the girls height and other things like that better (especially if it's from a voyeur perspective) as you are able to see that much more of the picture without having to zoom out. I'm actually in the minority that prefer nonpov over pov and the few scenes ive sampled really gives it a different feeling, especially with 6dof as you can move your eyes around and feel as if you're sitting there looking around the room without having to move your head for certain angles, whereas on q2 that narrowed fov gives it more of a cramped feeling.

The extra fov also helps in pov as well, as lets say in squatting cowgirl whereas quest 2 might cutoff in the middle of each of the girls knees, you can see both clearly with a little space on each side (all speaking in default picture settings, not having to zoom out or adjust horizontal offset). If you're a fan of voyeur/nonpov you will really like the upgrades (can imagine it's the same in gaming when walking through large rooms or areas). The color passthrough is pretty awesome but like others have said, the brighter your room is the clearer things will be. The adjusters on the headstrap are not as cheap as q2, but strap itself not much better comfort wise. It's not to the point where it's hyper realistic, but a lot easier to get lost and "immersed" in it imho, definitely a noticeable upgrade over q2.

Ventriloquist_Tacos

doorsareopen You mention you're in the minority of those that prefer non POV. Well, I'm in your camp, and even if a minority, there's a lot of us and definately a market to be tapped.

I especially prefer non POV for gangbangs. To me, the holy grail would be to have a studio who does videos like analvids.com but in non POV VR. (Though I can do without a piss version like they have). So far the most promising on that crazy hardcore end would be Putalocura VR, and sometimes SinsVR or Realjam, when they decide to do it. The closest actual video I've seen to the above described analvids style would be the Billie Star gangbang.

mebejoe

Ventriloquist_Tacos

I'm not sure why, but I'm finding the Quest 3 is an upgrade to my HP Reverb and my Pico 4 as well. The pass through is miles ahead of the Pico 4.

I don't understand the tech aspect enough to know it seems better (pixel count is about the same, yes?).

I shelled out the extra $$ and got the 512 version.

I really hate that I like it so much, because now I need to deal with the Meta-Verse.

I also don't like, in order to use Steam, the complexity of dealing with Meta Link and then having to first load the old Oculus interface (or whatever it's called), and then loading in Steam

But for just using SLR, which doesn't require Steam, it's great and I 100% recommend it over all the headsets I've had -- HP Reverb, Rift, Rift S, Samsung Odyssey, and Pico 4 (I think that's it).

Vrsumo2017

mebejoe Pico 4

In dim light which on is grainer pico or quest 3?

Say you just had a lamp on in your room and no light from outside windows, which one looks the grainest?

Ventriloquist_Tacos

mebejoe I have the G2 too and agree the Q3 is better. When you do the math they have very close to the same resolution, but the PANCAKE LENSES are a big deal. Pancakes only for me, from now on. Now we just desperately need OLED and Jack that res up to 3500×3500 per eye or better. 🙂 The latter will only be in high end devices for awhile obviously, but I'm calling OLED with 2500x2500+ for Quest 4 now.

SchnuppiLilac

sylvan I think the main difference is that zooming will move the girl (and your virtual dick) closer towards you while increasing the horizontal offset a little will make the girl appear bigger but will not change her position.

sylvan

SchnuppiLilac ah yes, thanks

« Previous Page Next Page »