Vrsumo2017 hello; when I find the character too small: I use the zoom instead (I didn't see any difference with horizontal OFF set ): or am I wrong?
Quest 3 announced
so I found a black dead pixel on my Quest 3 and I can't unsee it because its right in my eye line and my eyes keep focussing on it. I am returning it and getting another one. Anybody else get a similar issue with theirs?
Ventriloquist_Tacos everyone’s entitled to their opinion obviously but I couldn’t disagree more with this. Nothing ruins a scene more for me than the camera giving me a view that is physically impossible to achieve in real life. It completely throws me out of the scene if it feels like my dick is 6 inches below my chin. Realistic distance and scale are more important to me than crystal clear visuals. Ideally we should be getting both though.
You can achieve close up shots realistically in cowgirl and missionary but doggy style, blow jobs etc should be a realistic distance from the average person’s eyeline. That’s my opinion anyway, each to his own though.
sylvan horizontal off set works by spreading both left and right image outwards or inwards,
Outwards would be to make it bigger that wouod he the +
Inward would be to make it smaller that would be -
It works for me.
What exactly are you doing?
- Edited
Ventriloquist_Tacos but they should quickly transition those closer to the woman's face/body.
You mean the camera closer to the models face and body or the model get her face and body close to the camera?
Example
During Standing doggy the model arches up towards the camera in a kinda standing position looking back at the camera and you can see her tits looking over her shoulders cuz she closer to the cam.
Far away missionary, the model is laying but she can sit up in a sitting position holding on to guys ass cheeks while her face is closer the camera
Laying cg the model can lean in to the camera for face to face cg while her tits are squished on his chest or her tits are up close to the camera.
Laying rcg the model leans back closer to the cam with sum eye contact.
I'm just wondering, are yall suggesting the camera be closer or the models should get closer.
I want the kisses closer to the cam as possible, sometimes the model to far, also 69's sometimes they're to far from the cam, the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER! 
LOL.
Vrsumo2017 the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER!
Happens all the time 
- Edited
After a couple days with q3, couple quick observations, not night and day but image quality definitely a little bit better. For me the increased fov really does wonders. Not a whole lot more than q2 but that extra little bit gives you a better perspective of the surroundings and and you are able to judge things like the girls height and other things like that better (especially if it's from a voyeur perspective) as you are able to see that much more of the picture without having to zoom out. I'm actually in the minority that prefer nonpov over pov and the few scenes ive sampled really gives it a different feeling, especially with 6dof as you can move your eyes around and feel as if you're sitting there looking around the room without having to move your head for certain angles, whereas on q2 that narrowed fov gives it more of a cramped feeling.
The extra fov also helps in pov as well, as lets say in squatting cowgirl whereas quest 2 might cutoff in the middle of each of the girls knees, you can see both clearly with a little space on each side (all speaking in default picture settings, not having to zoom out or adjust horizontal offset). If you're a fan of voyeur/nonpov you will really like the upgrades (can imagine it's the same in gaming when walking through large rooms or areas). The color passthrough is pretty awesome but like others have said, the brighter your room is the clearer things will be. The adjusters on the headstrap are not as cheap as q2, but strap itself not much better comfort wise. It's not to the point where it's hyper realistic, but a lot easier to get lost and "immersed" in it imho, definitely a noticeable upgrade over q2.
I'm not sure why, but I'm finding the Quest 3 is an upgrade to my HP Reverb and my Pico 4 as well. The pass through is miles ahead of the Pico 4.
I don't understand the tech aspect enough to know it seems better (pixel count is about the same, yes?).
I shelled out the extra $$ and got the 512 version.
I really hate that I like it so much, because now I need to deal with the Meta-Verse.
I also don't like, in order to use Steam, the complexity of dealing with Meta Link and then having to first load the old Oculus interface (or whatever it's called), and then loading in Steam
But for just using SLR, which doesn't require Steam, it's great and I 100% recommend it over all the headsets I've had -- HP Reverb, Rift, Rift S, Samsung Odyssey, and Pico 4 (I think that's it).
mebejoe Pico 4
In dim light which on is grainer pico or quest 3?
Say you just had a lamp on in your room and no light from outside windows, which one looks the grainest?
Vrsumo2017 my understanding was that he was saying the camera should move closer so you could really zoom in close on a blowjob rather than watch it from a realistic distance.
I’ve no issue with models leaning in closer, that’s totally different. The doggy style thing you mention where she kneels up and leans back is fine but I wouldn’t want the whole doggy section shot like that. I’m an ass guy so I like to see the girls ass too and doggy is the best position for that when the girl is fully bent over, face down, ass up!
Vrsumo2017 in fact as I always find women too small, I use the zoom: it makes them bigger
sylvan I think the main difference is that zooming will move the girl (and your virtual dick) closer towards you while increasing the horizontal offset a little will make the girl appear bigger but will not change her position.
SchnuppiLilac ah yes, thanks
Man, anyone know about this quest lite coming later? I'm thinking another quest GO but just for media players, web browsers and better pass through, what else would it be, a liter quest?
- Edited
Vrsumo2017 Half the price of Q3, could be a pure VR headset with no PT and fresnel lenses.
Vrsumo2017 this quest lite coming later
What's also coming later, according to my local Amazon, is the 512 GB Q3. Available in 3 to 7 months. How do they come up with these numbers? If one of the two guys who build it gets run over by a car, it will take twice as long but better add another month just to be safe?
SchnuppiLilac What's also coming later, according to my local Amazon, is the 512 GB Q3.
Not sure where you are. I'm in the US. It's available here now. I got mine from Amazon delivered two days ago.
Zooming in distorts the video. It warps it and destroys the quality. It’ll make it closer but you sacrifice quality/resolution. Zooming out makes it crisper and sharper but it also makes it less immersive and is more like you’re in the room watching her bang some other dude and it takes you out of first person. The horizontal offset just shifts the image equally left or right so it doesn’t affect quality, from what I understand.
mebejoe I am farther away from the source. I assume that Meta is prioritising the US market before other regions. Here, it was not available on release day and today I saw these ridiculously high numbers (better order now if you want to have it for Xmas 2024). Seems that also the people who pre-ordered didn't get one so far. Situation for the 128 GB version is much better and I will most likely go for that one anyway.