OliverDK Next issue is that when I finally get the model aligned then just a bit of a tilt of my head an the model shifts a tiny bit. It's annoying. Scale is also an issue that becomes very apparent in AR porn - with the exception of the latest SLR scenes then most scenes features giants

Use horizontal off set to increase and decrease image. + is for bigger - is for smaller

And turn on 6dof, the switch is usually on but you got slide the slider all the way to the right.

Imo best way to explore pt at first is in a laying position watching laying cg rcg. 👍

      are there any IMAGE settings on the RIGHT of the clips to HELP with out-of-the-box washed-out image?

      will a NEW update here make our controllers like before...where the joy stick lets up LOOK up and down vs making it close and far.

      there are some tweaks for sure to make...just not sure what to do.

      i kept seeing 2160 and found the area to change this...BUT what to change it to?

        i don't...apparently they just pop out like that 🙂

        spanker will a NEW update here make our controllers like before...where the joy stick lets up LOOK up and down vs making it close and far.

        You go to the settings at the deo menu, look for player controls and look for "pitch" in the list, click on it and press up and then click the green check

            OliverDK horizontal off set is in the image options in case you can't find it.

            You gonna want to use the + and - instead to the slider.

            So example
            If the model looks to small, go to horizontal off set and click + one time, look at the model, still to small? Click the + again. That works for me.

            I use pt for the scale too for regular vrp, if it looks to small or big, I turn on pt and I use falloff in the pt options and adjust the scale with horizontal offset and then turn pt off. Move the "fall off" to the left so the video is transparent.

                spanker i kept seeing 2160 and found the area to change this...BUT what to change it to?

                You talking about switching from 4k to 8k?

                When you watching a video on the player on the left corner of it there's different numbers you can select, the top # is the highest, just click on them what ever one you like just leave it there.

                    Lol, I dare one of yall to try the pt outdoors

                    Lol get sum seated cg rcg action outback.
                    And then back to your room for laying cg rcg 👍

                    Vrsumo2017 hello; when I find the character too small: I use the zoom instead (I didn't see any difference with horizontal OFF set ): or am I wrong?

                        so I found a black dead pixel on my Quest 3 and I can't unsee it because its right in my eye line and my eyes keep focussing on it. I am returning it and getting another one. Anybody else get a similar issue with theirs?

                          Ventriloquist_Tacos everyone’s entitled to their opinion obviously but I couldn’t disagree more with this. Nothing ruins a scene more for me than the camera giving me a view that is physically impossible to achieve in real life. It completely throws me out of the scene if it feels like my dick is 6 inches below my chin. Realistic distance and scale are more important to me than crystal clear visuals. Ideally we should be getting both though.

                          You can achieve close up shots realistically in cowgirl and missionary but doggy style, blow jobs etc should be a realistic distance from the average person’s eyeline. That’s my opinion anyway, each to his own though.

                            theHobbit not noticed any issue with mine yet. There is a YouTube review earlier in the thread or maybe the thread in POVR forum where the reviewer had a dead pixel so maybe it’s a common fault.

                              sylvan horizontal off set works by spreading both left and right image outwards or inwards,

                              Outwards would be to make it bigger that wouod he the +
                              Inward would be to make it smaller that would be -

                              It works for me.
                              What exactly are you doing?

                                  Ventriloquist_Tacos but they should quickly transition those closer to the woman's face/body.

                                  You mean the camera closer to the models face and body or the model get her face and body close to the camera?

                                  Example
                                  During Standing doggy the model arches up towards the camera in a kinda standing position looking back at the camera and you can see her tits looking over her shoulders cuz she closer to the cam.

                                  Far away missionary, the model is laying but she can sit up in a sitting position holding on to guys ass cheeks while her face is closer the camera

                                  Laying cg the model can lean in to the camera for face to face cg while her tits are squished on his chest or her tits are up close to the camera.

                                  Laying rcg the model leans back closer to the cam with sum eye contact.

                                  I'm just wondering, are yall suggesting the camera be closer or the models should get closer.

                                  I want the kisses closer to the cam as possible, sometimes the model to far, also 69's sometimes they're to far from the cam, the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER! 🤦‍♂️ LOL.

                                      Vrsumo2017 the model be there saying oh it feels good how you eat me, eat it" and I'm like I would if YOU GOT CLOSER! 🤦‍♂️ LOL.

                                      Happens all the time 😃

                                        After a couple days with q3, couple quick observations, not night and day but image quality definitely a little bit better. For me the increased fov really does wonders. Not a whole lot more than q2 but that extra little bit gives you a better perspective of the surroundings and and you are able to judge things like the girls height and other things like that better (especially if it's from a voyeur perspective) as you are able to see that much more of the picture without having to zoom out. I'm actually in the minority that prefer nonpov over pov and the few scenes ive sampled really gives it a different feeling, especially with 6dof as you can move your eyes around and feel as if you're sitting there looking around the room without having to move your head for certain angles, whereas on q2 that narrowed fov gives it more of a cramped feeling.

                                        The extra fov also helps in pov as well, as lets say in squatting cowgirl whereas quest 2 might cutoff in the middle of each of the girls knees, you can see both clearly with a little space on each side (all speaking in default picture settings, not having to zoom out or adjust horizontal offset). If you're a fan of voyeur/nonpov you will really like the upgrades (can imagine it's the same in gaming when walking through large rooms or areas). The color passthrough is pretty awesome but like others have said, the brighter your room is the clearer things will be. The adjusters on the headstrap are not as cheap as q2, but strap itself not much better comfort wise. It's not to the point where it's hyper realistic, but a lot easier to get lost and "immersed" in it imho, definitely a noticeable upgrade over q2.

                                          Ventriloquist_Tacos

                                          I'm not sure why, but I'm finding the Quest 3 is an upgrade to my HP Reverb and my Pico 4 as well. The pass through is miles ahead of the Pico 4.

                                          I don't understand the tech aspect enough to know it seems better (pixel count is about the same, yes?).

                                          I shelled out the extra $$ and got the 512 version.

                                          I really hate that I like it so much, because now I need to deal with the Meta-Verse.

                                          I also don't like, in order to use Steam, the complexity of dealing with Meta Link and then having to first load the old Oculus interface (or whatever it's called), and then loading in Steam

                                          But for just using SLR, which doesn't require Steam, it's great and I 100% recommend it over all the headsets I've had -- HP Reverb, Rift, Rift S, Samsung Odyssey, and Pico 4 (I think that's it).