SLR Originals reset plan - Nov '23

theHobbit You folk make no sense. Nobody said that. You said that people will leave blah blah. I said which sites. You said blah blah. I said it'll cost around $75 lol. You then proceeded to cry to doubleVR that I am trolling you. and implied that SLR should do something about it. Honestly haha.

theHobbit This is unlike some others like yourself who entertain the notion of SLR users 'flocking to other sites' simply on whimsical pretexts that you disagree with some of the strategic direction being employed by this site.

Are you really this dense? Do you have no idea what implications are? I wouldn't be surprised honestly. AGAIN, When customers don't like something they leave. The fact that you can't grasp that is honestly impressively dumb.

Imagine if I just joined ONE of the sites I listed... Or joined a couple at a discounted rate. Wow there goes your $75 theory, huh? Wanna know why that was so easy? B/c your point was half-baked and myopic as usual.

What "whimsical pretext" are you talking about? You just throw words out there that are probably impressive to people like you but can't make a good, relevant point to save your life. It's just logical fallacy after logical fallacy. I could literally make an entire thread of just nonsensical things/conspiracy theories from you at this point. This is literally a post about SLR's future plans. No pretext needed.

There's a reason why MULTIPLE people think you're just a troll. Just b/c you take a break from it every once in a while makes you no less of a troll.... haha.

What I'm saying makes sense you just lack the ability to understand...or stay on topic at all for that matter. Learn to address the actual point or sod off.

jommy Keep in mind SLR is an aggregator site, i'm sure a ton of people pay for it because of that

True, and I like them for that, but there are still plenty of exclusively VR studios who are not or are no longer on SLR. They are not impervious to losing business. I don't want them to lose business, I'm merely stating that it could potentially happen if customers are not satisfied with their VR output. And I'm really not sold that AR fans are gonna fill that gap. It's all speculation at this point but that's what this thread is for.

Everything sounds good except no 3. Nash has actually enough work to do with creating VR content. His recent VRSpy scenes are some of the best fucking VR scenes of the past few months or even years. Way better than most other VR content on SLR, including his own work. That's what I expect from SLR on a constant basis. Taking even a few hours of his precious time away for inferior and limited AR stuff is a travesty.

g2kbuffetboy Not to mention that all of this is just nonsense from a data science POV. If you really wanted to compare preferences, you'd need to release a Nash vid and a PT vid of the same actress on the same day and see which format people prefer to experience that performer in. Even that may be suspect, as a lot of new subs have signed on for the PT, and old subs may have left due to the decline in regular VR quality. In that case, all you are really proving is that you've changed the fanbase, which is fine if its bigger, otherwise it's just zero-sum churn. Not to mention that Simsense is going to get a lot of likes simply because most of the newer and in-demand stars get shot in PT first.

vrguy69 There's a reason why MULTIPLE people think you're just a troll. Just b/c you take a break from it every once in a while makes you no less of a troll.... haha.

My biggest issue here is that he doesn't seem capable of disagreeing respectfully and politely. It's a matter of being civil.

Again, though: stop feeding him. He wants attention, and you're giving it to him constantly. Stop playing the game.

petermc I totally respect your preferences.

petermc Watching endless boring “realistic” scenes is not my idea of pornography. Not to break it to you but normal people don’t have sex for an hour and do all the positions, most girls aren’t going to blow you every time either. None of it is realistic.

My point is that your preference from traditional pornography is still a preference for a particular type of fantasy. GFE VR, intimate VR, etc is a different type of fantasy made possible by the medium that ISN"T really possible in flat porn. We need to nurture it, not complain that it "isn't pornography", or that it isn't the "future". And we certainly don't need to indulge those few choice members who derogate it by saying that those who enjoy it must be sexless nerds or not real men.

This type of porn is only possible in VR. To stop making it is to ignore the medium.

vrguy69 Imagine if I just joined ONE of the sites I listed... Or joined a couple at a discounted rate. Wow there goes your $75 theory, huh? Wanna know why that was so easy? B/c your point was half-baked and myopic as usual.

Which one are you going to join Badoink - the one with grainy videos or NA - the one with blurry videos?

vrguy69 whimsical pretext

This means that your comment.....

vrguy69 The main customer base is still VR users, and if a sizable group of VR users don't like the direction SLR is going, they will flock to competitors who focus on VR. Simple as that.

....was pulled out of your backside, with no empirical data supporting your statement. I just reduced your comment to two words 'whimsical pretext' as I am clever like that

Wendigo My biggest issue here is that he doesn't seem capable of disagreeing respectfully and politely. It's a matter of being civil.

Again, though: stop feeding him. He wants attention, and you're giving it to him constantly. Stop playing the game.

Awww it's nice to see you all together in your little support group - therapy is good and you can all share your experiences about ME in a safe setting hahahahahah. I hope you get biscuits and tea afterwards

theHobbit Is scenes 1 to 20 in chronological order, as I am going to do some line charts?

Yes, sorted by "Newest" x each director. It's not a perfect science as @Wendigo mentions, as there are many reasons for "likes" (models, passthrough vs standard, timing, scripts, etc) and of course other metrics we do not see. But yeah, that is how I got the numbers up above.

theHobbit Which one are you going to join Badoink - the one with grainy videos or NA - the one with blurry videos?

Your argument is that SLR has no viable competition: Obviously false

theHobbit This means that your comment.....

it's objectively not pretext if I'm responding LITERALLY to a thread about SLR's future plans and how customers might react. Listen carefully so you understand: THAT is the pretext!

You might work with data, but your grasp of linguistics and logic are not your strong suit. Is getting dogpiled all the time your kink or what? Just change your tone and we'd all be better off.