• SLR

  • SLR Party Riots

g2kbuffetboy I'll have to go back and watch it again.
If I remember the picture quality wasn't as good and the image was really blurry on the edges. And my lap was too far away.
@alexnash put out Breast Friends for SLR with the normal camera right before this scene. That scene looked perfect in everyway to me. So I remember being super excited for Blake and Melody. As soon as I turned it on I could tell it wasn't as good. I can't put my finger on it other than something just don't feel right. Scale and picture

I said something about it looking blurry and why did he change to this camera when the other scene was perfection. Someone said that they watched with Heresphere and it didn't look blurry. I downloaded it and Heresphere did fix the blurriness with the auto focus. Plus zooming worked a lot better at keeping everything looking more normal.
I didn't think the picture quality was better, I thought it was worse.

The Euro picture looks ok although I still think overall the older camera looks better for sharpness or what ever it is.

      Hairsational A small number of users tend to spam a complaint they might have across numerous threads on the Forum on a daily basis, regardless of its relevance to the thread - so we're tightening down on that.

      Instead they can share their complaints in this thread as often as they'd like, as long as it's respectful.

        Joker7 So, you made a thread for users to complain in, and then you ban them when they complain in it?

        See my post above.

        If you (or anyone) have feedback/criticisms/etc., feel free to share them in relevant threads. No one is stopping you from doing that. But there is a VAST difference between 1.) sharing your complaints and providing critical feedback where it's relevant, and 2.) spamming the same complaint across dozens of posts and threads.

        99.9% of commenters don't do option #2, so this thread was made for those who do.

            justsomedude101 If you (or anyone) have feedback/criticisms/etc., feel free to share them in relevant threads. No one is stopping you from doing that. But there is a VAST difference between 1.) sharing your complaints and providing critical feedback where it's relevant, and 2.) spamming the same complaint across dozens of posts and threads.

            As a commenter it's natural to give feedback in the thread where the relevant discussion is happening rather than in an unrelated thread. Are you saying there is some unknown (to a commenter) threshold for when feedback should be directed to this thread instead? What if a commenter wants to reply to someone? Also, why is this odd rule only being enforced on the forum and not in scene comments where there are people spamming the same comment for many scenes and the comments are far more visible?

              • [deleted]

              • Post #191

              theHobbit not naming or singling anybody in particular

              There are other examples of this general feature of the recent films at SLR. Far be it from me to challenge you if you are into Lizzo, like most Americans, or guys, like many Americans, or trans, like more than 10% of American University students... My point is that for the vast majority of patrons who pay for porn this isn't what they're looking for. SLR can keep shooting this stuff all they want. I'm just saying that in my opinion it's not a profitable venture. To maintain a monthly or yearly subscription at SLR is costly, at least for most foreigners whose money isn't worth as much (as you will soon experience in America, seeing your recent downgrade from AAA to AA+, wow!) SLR must maintain a stream of good, if not excellent films. POVR is $15.00 per month. Badoink is on special for $10.00. One could subscribe to both of those sites for less than an SLR Premium account at $29 USD. While Alex Nash and On the Telly are incredible directors, I'll probably subscribe to them intermittently soon based on the particular niche characteristics of their casting.

              theHobbit Jessica Starling

              I downloaded one of her videos to check it out. I haven't downloaded any other videos of her from SLR. I think she has too much plastic surgery, so she's not my type. However, I can see how she'd be appealing to mainstream viewers of porn. If you are into her, she dances at a place called "The Brass Rail" in Toronto, where each fully nude dance costs about half of an SLR membership. She has talked about this, and you can look up the price and what they do at the club.

                    • [deleted]

                    • Post #192
                    • Edited

                    I think @Will65 has contributed meaningful discussion and debate to this forum. I don't like to be critical; I much prefer giving compliment to criticism. But @doublevr has ambitions to make SLR popular. The best way to do that is to look at successful sites. I think he should look at FTVGirls, which has been around for 30 years and made its owner, a former dentist, own the 7th most expensive house in Tempe, Az. He could look at Backroomcastingcouch, which has introduced new models for about 15 years. (FTV is 20 years old.) Another site to look at is AbbyWinters, which is more than 20 years old. PornHub probably isn't the best comparison, since they made money as a pirate site and now mostly lose money (except for the advertising bucks) since embracing only registered accounts. One shared characteristic of these sites is that most of their models are young, have not shot much porn, are willing to go the extra mile (for good pay), and embrace BTS content. The majority of their models, if covered in tattoos, at least have tasteful tattoos (most, not all).

                    petermc
                    YES!! Where have girls like this gone?? Lexus Locklear post implants. Jenna Jameson. Devon. Briana Banks, etc. etc. The sexy, slutty glamorous barbie dolls. Where have they gone? Do they not exist anymore? Are they all on OnlyFans?

                    Seems every girl with larger breasts now is 'curvy' (to use the polite, politically correct term)

                    Just not that attracted to so many of the current castings.

                      [deleted] I think you and a small group of other commentators aim to create a toxic environment on this site for the kind of women I like. There are plenty of women on this site I could be very critical about but I don't point to specific performers as I think they probably float the boat of someone else and I'm good with that. Variety is the spice of life as they say.

                          doublevr This will probably get deleted but hopefully some people will see it before hand.
                          I have been final warned with "Do not promote competitive products on such a blatant manner"

                          I guess I can't say this when responding to @g2kbuffetboy

                          rerun119 Someone said that they watched with Heresphere and it didn't look blurry. I downloaded it and Heresphere did fix the blurriness with the auto focus. Plus zooming worked a lot better at keeping everything looking more normal.

                          It's that or me helping a guy because he started a new thread about not being able to watch local scripts with DEO anymore. It's broken until SLR fixes it. I told him to use Heresphere because it still works and it's better anyways. How I'm I suppose to help that guy be able to watch scripts if I can't write to him in that thread? Or is the idea not to help him because then he will figure out the secret. How does any of this hurt SLR? No one is going to leave SLR because they use a different video player.

                          Edit: I just found the post on that thread. It was deleted but I guess I can still see it. Here is exactly what I wrote.
                          Use Heresphere. They all work with it plus it is a better player and picture quality if you haven't tried it

                          This is crazy to me that I can't write that

                                • [deleted]

                                • Post #198
                                • Edited

                                theHobbit to create a toxic environment

                                I gave valid and rational criticism. You have resorted to name calling. I truly feel sorry for you in that evidently you have an unusual sense of what is beautiful. You don't have to listen to me @doublevr, just don't be surprised when subscriptions go down and you lose money. I never criticized weight or any other personal characteristic that is unchangeable. I criticized extensive plastic surgery and tattoos, which are a matter of niche tastes on most other sites.

                                    rerun119 keep your stupid shit to this thread and we will be fine.
                                    If you don't like everything we do find yourself anther place.
                                    We make people happy. Seeing you frustrated most of the time tears my loving heart.

                                      [deleted] just keep it to this thread from now on. We don't have to see you stealing every other thread ⚠️

                                        Anyone watched the South Park episode named 'Cartmanland' where he inherits a milliion dollars to buy his own theme park and not let any go on the rides until he realises he has to pay bills to keep the business running - It's uncanny 🙂

                                          [deleted] I truly feel sorry for you in that evidently you have an unusual sense of what is beautiful.

                                          lol, why would you TRULY feel sorry for my so called unusual sense of what is beautiful? What a strange individual you are.

                                              • [deleted]

                                              • Post #205

                                              theHobbit feel sorry for my so called unusual sense

                                              You have an "unusual" sense of beauty in that you claim not to appreciate women as they are made by God or Nature but scarred from needles and ink or transformed by the cuts of a surgeon's knife. The majority of the world feels differently about female beauty.