SLR Party Riots

theHobbit I think there should be an absolute zero tolerance on criticising talent on these forums and those sorts of posts should be deleted.

Disagree, it won't be fair to give them only positive comments, and the one with negative comments "only" shouldn't be considered for future shoots, but don't be excessive about it and making a full time job like @[deleted] who just can't drop it. Also there are models who do criticize other people, and literally using the word "UGLY" and getting away with it, like Hailey Rose posted on twitter for instance or like Jessica Starling who felt a bit picky, but they would both have different opinions with the right amount of money. It just goes both ways I should be able to use words as harsh as "UGLY" otherwise it's gonna be considered a discrimination in favor of them.

[deleted] So my first thought on that Hailey Rose tweet was to think the worst of her, but then i considered the possibility that maybe she got booked for something like one of those Tadpolex scenes where they wanted her to fuck some legit fat dudes in facemasks or something.

SchnuppiLilac Ahh ok, i don't have twitter so i couldn't read the comments.

theHobbit I understand your perspective, and I see what you mean, but the way I see it, it is even worse. Not naming someone in particular could imply that the criticism is directed towards a larger group of people "all those aren't literal sex athletes, or not world's most desirable people, and all the ugly performers in the world".

It would be strange if Connie decides to stop shooting for SLR simply because they allowed 2 or 3 negative comments about her body. Models should learn how to handle negative feedback, and that's completely okay, it comes with the territory of being in the industry. Deleting every single negative comment would set SLR apart from most other porn sites, Flat and VR, where such comments are often allowed, as long as nobody's wishing death or cursing anyone. In fact even on Onlyfans you're allowed to do so, as long as you pay. You can literally send a $10 tip with negative feedback, and they will be happy with it and ask for more, since this type of feedback helps them improve themselves. Lol!

Just to be clear, I'm not sharing those tweets to spread hate or make others dislike those models. My point is simple: if they can criticize others and be picky about who they work with, then we should be able to voice our opinions about models' looks too. In the way we want to certain limits of course. And also to expose their hypocrisy (which is kinda off topic) cuz I'm 100% sure they'd both have sex with a random ugly fat ass noseless Voldemort looking dude, if they know he's got XXmillion $ in his bank account.

I couldn't imagine following pornstars on social media or learning anything about their personal lives, opinions on the world, etc. Fastest way for me to never want to watch their scenes ever again.

They're selling a fantasy. I hope they work in safe and ethical conditions but beyond that I need that disconnect.

g2kbuffetboy I'll have to go back and watch it again.
If I remember the picture quality wasn't as good and the image was really blurry on the edges. And my lap was too far away.
@alexnash put out Breast Friends for SLR with the normal camera right before this scene. That scene looked perfect in everyway to me. So I remember being super excited for Blake and Melody. As soon as I turned it on I could tell it wasn't as good. I can't put my finger on it other than something just don't feel right. Scale and picture

I said something about it looking blurry and why did he change to this camera when the other scene was perfection. Someone said that they watched with Heresphere and it didn't look blurry. I downloaded it and Heresphere did fix the blurriness with the auto focus. Plus zooming worked a lot better at keeping everything looking more normal.
I didn't think the picture quality was better, I thought it was worse.

The Euro picture looks ok although I still think overall the older camera looks better for sharpness or what ever it is.

doublevr That's a strange way to treat a customer. Did he do something bad?

Hairsational A small number of users tend to spam a complaint they might have across numerous threads on the Forum on a daily basis, regardless of its relevance to the thread - so we're tightening down on that.

Instead they can share their complaints in this thread as often as they'd like, as long as it's respectful.

Joker7 So, you made a thread for users to complain in, and then you ban them when they complain in it?

See my post above.

If you (or anyone) have feedback/criticisms/etc., feel free to share them in relevant threads. No one is stopping you from doing that. But there is a VAST difference between 1.) sharing your complaints and providing critical feedback where it's relevant, and 2.) spamming the same complaint across dozens of posts and threads.

99.9% of commenters don't do option #2, so this thread was made for those who do.

justsomedude101 If you (or anyone) have feedback/criticisms/etc., feel free to share them in relevant threads. No one is stopping you from doing that. But there is a VAST difference between 1.) sharing your complaints and providing critical feedback where it's relevant, and 2.) spamming the same complaint across dozens of posts and threads.

As a commenter it's natural to give feedback in the thread where the relevant discussion is happening rather than in an unrelated thread. Are you saying there is some unknown (to a commenter) threshold for when feedback should be directed to this thread instead? What if a commenter wants to reply to someone? Also, why is this odd rule only being enforced on the forum and not in scene comments where there are people spamming the same comment for many scenes and the comments are far more visible?

theHobbit not naming or singling anybody in particular

There are other examples of this general feature of the recent films at SLR. Far be it from me to challenge you if you are into Lizzo, like most Americans, or guys, like many Americans, or trans, like more than 10% of American University students... My point is that for the vast majority of patrons who pay for porn this isn't what they're looking for. SLR can keep shooting this stuff all they want. I'm just saying that in my opinion it's not a profitable venture. To maintain a monthly or yearly subscription at SLR is costly, at least for most foreigners whose money isn't worth as much (as you will soon experience in America, seeing your recent downgrade from AAA to AA+, wow!) SLR must maintain a stream of good, if not excellent films. POVR is $15.00 per month. Badoink is on special for $10.00. One could subscribe to both of those sites for less than an SLR Premium account at $29 USD. While Alex Nash and On the Telly are incredible directors, I'll probably subscribe to them intermittently soon based on the particular niche characteristics of their casting.

theHobbit Jessica Starling

I downloaded one of her videos to check it out. I haven't downloaded any other videos of her from SLR. I think she has too much plastic surgery, so she's not my type. However, I can see how she'd be appealing to mainstream viewers of porn. If you are into her, she dances at a place called "The Brass Rail" in Toronto, where each fully nude dance costs about half of an SLR membership. She has talked about this, and you can look up the price and what they do at the club.