rerun119 it's not criticism from you guys any more. You go too much all over the place hi-jacking normal discussion. You lost any credibility. You are not fit for a civil discussion which you turn into infinite fight. It's no different than conspiracies, flat earthers and all that.
This thread is yours. Please keep the rest of the forum clean.
@Will65's criticisms are valid in my opinion. You guys make really great films. It's just painful to see so many lost opportunities with the VR180 format. Busty women covered head-to-toe in tattoos is a very exclusive niche. For generations porn has been about depicting the young ingénue of classical good looks first looking genuine and then surrendering to perversions.
You have asked for feedback: more BTS content, more solo content and narrative before the film starts, less hooker-ware, three-inch heals, and street-side cosmetics. Your site is called "SexLikeReal". Real women look naturally hot and, outside of L.A., don't have massive boobs from plastic surgery. Chubby women are fine, but typically where the film quality is high the casting doesn't live up to that standard. As feedback, please do multiple films and BTS stuff with Myra Glasford / Myra Moans. Do naked show and tell interviews for new models and models new to SLR. That's very civilly expressed, I think, given my language skills in English. That said, if you want so called conspiracy theories, so many of these so called conspiracy theories have come true lately, with the release of COVID-19 and all, that I only know one really good one.
doublevr VRFanService is gone for totally unrelated reason. It's gone because there was no way to keep things going with him. The same like some people got banned from this place recently. It's just got too much for no reason.
"for no reason" = "he disagreed with me"
How do I know? Because he repeatedly agreed with ME in various other forums where SLR is discussed about all the things we have said in this thread that @doublevr tries to hide away from the rest of the forum. That's why we liked him (and why he was so popular) - he made VR the way the way it should be made.
rock1515 I've never been a fan of vrfanservice, primarily because the models they used were never within my taste more than anything, but I did respect the fact they were trying new things, that milk scene was good.
I wish more studios took more risks on the creativity side like they did instead of only being focused on the tech and "innovation" side of things. I think by now even a 5k video is good enough for me as long as it has proper exposure, focus and color grading, hell even SLR could make the k2 pro footage look incredible to the point that it really had very little to envy of the 8k system. Point is, we are at the point, in my opinion, where resolution is secondary to content, I would much rather watch something engaging in 5k than another boring ass cookie cutter 8k scene.
doublevr I can tell you are really mad that I went back and found all the times you wrote about how you were going to revolutionize vr with more innovative storytelling. You really didn't like it to be showed what you said you were going to do and then said you told Mack to do nothing but good camera work with sex from the start of the scene.
This is the opposite of conspiracies. No flat earth. Unless the conspiracy is you telling everybody on here what they want to hear and really just chase the money. Again, if you are just after the money then just say it. I can go find all the times you wrote that you are the only vr porn company not after the money but that's your words not mine.
You create all of my so called hi-jacking. You will not find me saying anything about how bad a girl looks on here. Or me bad mouthing other users (other than one guy that stopped posting). Or what other people on here are looking for. Or even other SLR employees other than ones that you told what to do.
The "hi-jacking" comes from you making grand statements that don't come true. If you say it, then I would think the CEO is going to do it thus me getting very frustrated being lied to. How many examples do you want me to put? Or will I be banned for pointing them out? No one else said them, only you.
It looks to me that you want to write all kinds of "we are going to do this and that" but you don't want anybody to question you about it when it doesn't happen. That is the "hi-jacking" to you.
Example of grand statement which causes the questioning.
On AI scripts - we nailed it (no one is allowed to question this there only here now cause its bad for other people to read it)
One month ago you wrote "Ultimately we are looking to have to majority of SLR database scripted in a matter of a month or two"
also 8 days ago you said in a month
I have not said anything about this because you still have a month to go. After being on here long enough to know how you just say thinks that aren't true. Some I just let go. Even though I want this to be true we both know it isn't. Do I really think 20,000 scenes are just going to be scripted in 30 days, NOOOOO
Other people show discontent over your promises of SLR Japan timeline as one example. They just don't interact with the forum as much as I do and some other.
Final point. I originally started writing on here because you seemed to want to listen to what the customers wanted and advise on how to improve. Now I see what you really don't want that at all.
metichemsi
vrfanservice also is the onthetelly director for slr originals.
Looks like it worked 
The forum is such a lovely place now 
doublevr Do you just pop by here to troll? Do you understand that this attitude is why a lot of us communicate with you in ways you disapprove of? Has it occurred to you that someone who is allowed to be the bully because they have power to silence others is still a bully?
Subscribers giving up on even bothering to communicate with you is not something to celebrate.
doublevr The forum is such a lovely place now
People are still repeating the exact same criticisms, you've just bullied them in to kissing your ass while they do it. Glad you seem proud of that.
Not really a complaint, but is there a reason why SLR moved away from niche stars like Mistress T, Meana Wolf, Larkin Love etc.?
diskgriffin time moves on. Mistress T retired, we were planning to shoot Larkin Love in May but it canceled, Meana Wolf isn't shooting outside of her channel.
no. @Will65, as you and others here well know, the forum is fucking awful. littered with casting and content request posts that should be in their own sub-forum(s) allowing actual discussion posts to be found. oh but wait - actual discussion is no longer permitted 
I honestly can’t be bothered to even log in to the SLR forum any more. but ya whatever.
SLR is being driven into the ground by its little emperor. so sad to see. I really can’t imagine they’ll keep Alex Nash around here much longer either, and then that truly will be the end. pfft. fucking sad.
wherever Nash goes though, that’s where I sub. hopefully it will be a place where discussion and valid criticism is not suppressed.
doublevr God, you are such a joke...
[deleted] none of the women you listed did anything for me - some are pretty but none of them aroused me in any way.
I like curvy chicks with big boobs, small waists and big asses, like the song lol. A girl can be skinny too but if she has her curves in the right places she can look extremely hot and thick too.
Also you chucked in a Mexican girl just so you can tick the diversity box when its clear you have an obvious type looking at most of the girls on your list.
I normally have a critique that most VR sites lack diversity but Alex Nash's recent scene kinda squashes that critique as it was clear to me that obviously directors are looking seriously at this aspect. Well done @alexnash and SLR on this front.
[deleted] Busty women covered head-to-toe in tattoos is a very exclusive niche. For generations porn has been about depicting the young ingénue of classical good looks
Dude, have you ever watched porn? Was Jenna Jameson (the biggest pornstar of all time) a young ingenue with classical good looks. No she was a slutty looking blonde with big fake tits and tattoos, not head to toe in tattoos (neither is anyone shot by SLRO) but some. Lots of classic US pornstars of that era were similar, girls like Jill Kelly, Stormy Daniels, Briana Banks, Lisa Ann, Shyla Stylez to name a few. There were exceptions of course but porn has always had a lot of pneumatic girls with crazy bodies as that’s what a lot of men like, big tits, slim waist and big ass. Just look at comic books for evidence of that.
In recent years, I’d say there has been a bit more of a move towards skinny flat chested young looking girls in porn and VR caters to that a hell of a lot. Don’t think for one second though that plenty of porn fans don’t still want that slutty unattainable fantasy girl with tits and tattoos rather than a “real” looking girl next door type.
doublevr I haven't been on here in 2 weeks because of you.
Let's take a poll and see if we can ban you from this forum. It would be a much better place around here. No more broken promises and bullying with threats of being banned if we don't agree with your wild ideas.
I work with enough narcissists at work to come read one at home.
How's that We Nailed It AI scripting working out. Seems like everybody thinks they are great. Remember how I said you shouldn't script the highest requested ones? I know i'm just a guy with nothing important to suggest because you know better. Maybe you will listen to all the other people in the comments that are really mad. I haven't read one good thing yet, but maybe i'm an idiot and you can ban all those people too.
What do I know, I'm only a guy that watches a lot of VR porn with a handy. I probably don't know when a scene is out of scale or the story is boring as hell. You on the other hand know how much money you can make with not listening to constructive criticism. So good for you
See, that's the problem: We are in the mid-2020s now. I like Christy Canyon and Ginger Lynn too, but we aren't in that era any more. It's better to move porn - especially VR porn - forward, not back to classic era flat porn.
