highkiller alexnash
What are you talking about? I haven't edited this post. On the other hand your response has an edited sing next to it. But it doesn't matter. My posts are often edited because english is my second language, unfortunately while using this forum on the phone sometimes I experience some kind of glitch that makes it hard to scroll back and revise my post before posting while writing it. Making it almost impossible correct some ill formed sentences or botched words. So because of that sometimes I correct those mistakes after posting by editing my post to make it more understandable. None of my posts were ever edited after someone responded to them (exception being someone pointing some error in my post but then I always mark those changes with "EDIT" written in the text).
spacepirate
This reply from spacepirate shows exact problem with overexposure that i was talking about.
alexnash about overexposed, ok - sometimes things go unnoticed on the set
Sometimes? Lately it is a standard practice in SLR original releases.
The SLR site doesn't allow me to make screen shots and I don't want to rewrite this and waste more of my time gathering evidence for you.
I will point out scenes that had those issue and you can revise them and make changes or don't. I don't appreciate coming back from work and working again for a site that that i pay to watch. This is supposed to be a way to relax and have fun for me and not a side project. Especially that you are not a starter company. You should have this shit figured out by now.
Here are the examples that i noticed:
Grey Clouds crystal shop - overexposed during cowgirl
Nuru Oil treatment with Lilly Bell - overexposed during intro and during cowgirl
i don't usually do this... - overexposed all the time
screwing out of school project - very bright ray of light is illuminating left side of Emma (but that is ok. Whole set looks good because of that). Problem starts when whe jump from dark intro, to bright left side illuminated standing missionary and back do the dark room. Also Face of Emma was too high during missionary and it was difficult to adjust it in setting. Which is frustrating for the longest time you guys were known for your perfect missionary shots. Now it is a game of chance.
Private Lesson - the part by the piano looked like an early Darkroomvr production. Above the head cold light overexposing Adria and casting shadows on her. And then we transition to a dungeon dark room where Adria looked like she was illuminated by phone camera flash light. Making her not lit enough and yet still partialy overexposed. She literally looked like someone was pointing a weak flashlight at her.
Your body wellness - overexposed during missionary
Sexual alchemy: sounds of pleasure - overexposed
Sugar baby sweet talk - overexposed
My stepbrother's girlfriend - overexposed during missionary on the couch
GFE scarlett treat - as it was already shown with screenshots massively overexposed for the whole duration of the first part. Then the bedroom part was ok but again we experience a drastic change in color. Starting in white cold lighting of the living room and going to warm almost too orange light of the bedroom.
Raw Taboo: unusual trio - the same mistakes as in GFE Scarlett and yet pushed a little further to be even worse. Dark room and very overposed girls in the first part shot in the living room and again we change the setting to bedroom and with it you jump from one end of light scale to another. Living room being overexposed pale white and bedroom being orange. Neither looking natural.
And those are just the latest scenes. I don't have time or the energy to look further down the list.
And i want to point out that those are the issues that i only saw from the trailers because i resigned from my subscription and it ended around Raw taboo: unusual trio. So i don't know if there aren't any more issues in the above mentioned scenes beside the things that i wrote down.
Also just compare the missionary position in My Dirty Laundry 2 and They're So Fired. The dirty laundry scene has perfect image sharpness and quality, the colours are perfect without making any changes and there are any drastic light or color changes when we move from laundry room to bedroom. They're So Fired was shot on the same camera and the colour and light are way worse (same with the Mean Girls).
I bought They're So Fired just because i Love Lilly and Laney together if it weren't for those to girls i wouldn't even think to buy it. After many tries and some dramatic changes in settings of deovr i managed to make this scene look ok but still it is still not even slightly comparable to Dirty Laundry 2 or Your Girlfriend, Kira Perez level of image quality, vivid natural colours and all around good lighting of the set and performers.
You guys have made in the past a lot of scenes that were close to perfect, a lot of scenes that had issues (some similar or the same to this one). Why aren't you taking note from your good scenes and try to replicate them and why aren't you learning from mistakes that you already made ?
There was a one month period between release of GFE scarlett treat and Raw Taboo: unusual trio. Isn't there someone in your team who reviews scenes after release to check for mistakes and quality check? Or even better. Before release. Because after a month you guys didn't fix the mistakes made in the first video you just made the same mistakes and made them even worse than before.
Sorry for responding so late to your message but i have a job a life and decreasing interest and engagement in SLR. Lately i am not as often on the forum because for a long time now I am not excited about any of your releases and often disappointed by them. Therefore I don't come here looking for some news about new scenes or BTS of new releases. I don't recommend new performes because I know that I will just be disappointed.
