Help SLR Originals nailing down the angles consistently

Cool idea! I'll try my hand at it. I'm mixing a few of the 190 fisheye Originals and the 200 fisheye Originals though. Let me know if you prefer just one or the other.

45 degree Reclined Seated POV works best for cowgirl IMO.
If the recline is too steep, then the FOV shrinks too much.
If the recline is too shallow, then it's almost like laying down POV but not as good.
Both the recent Kenna/Skye and the ACC/Bella were good examples of 45~ degrees:

45 degree recline also wells really well for teases and body licking, because we see more than just the top of their heads, and we can actually see their faces looking upwards:

Close-Up Missionary, well Nash is the master of that. There were some points in time (a year ago), where the position was too close, or too above, but those have been worked out and things have become super consistent nowadays.
Good example (Kenna/Skye):

Not As Good (too close and too above, Kenzie/Tru):

Laying down Cowgirl. I'm going to deviate a bit away from Master Nash, and say I actually really like VRFanservice's laying down angle in this scene. This may not be the best screenshot of this, but there is a lot of headroom in this shot, and there were moments in this scene where the performers could lean all the way forward and do "hoverface" cowgirl, which is when their faces are leaning super close, and hovering above the viewer's face. I think in order to achieve this, the camera needs to be very low and angled slightly upwards. The male nipples/torso still need to be in view of course, but the key is to have that ample headroom for ultra close lean-ins.

That's all I got for now =) Must get back to work!

I personally want to see more time of the models taking the clothes off and showing off their entire body in full view, especially chicks with really nice asses and curves like a Valentina Nappi you recently had. it was a great scene, but so little of her whole body in the shot, it got close up super quick and just kind of stayed there. NA imo has been the best at showing off the strengths of the specific model's body.

I just thought of position I'd like see we hardly ever or never seen...

Boy girl scissoring, book a big stunt cock male model for that in pov.

Philip After reading comments from different websites lean-in cowgirl seated cowgirl and closeup missionary are most popular among people just do them in every scene.

Why on Earth would you want to standardize shooting positions. Scenes are cookie cutter enough already. The scenes that work for me show angles that I don't see all the time. I know it's not for everyone, but I like when a director figures out how to combine non-POV with POV. I like (occasionally) when I can see the cumshot up close when the female takes it on the face or in the mouth. Seems like almost every scene starts off with the female on her knees, then he goes in for some DATY, then corgirl, missionary and finally cumshot. C'mon. You can do better. Mix it up.

One import general remark about positions is to be able to match the perspective of the scene with reality and align your body to that of the male performer. When this is done well it will feel far more immersive and natural. When it's done badly it's really hard to get a feeling that your in the scene and not watching something on a screen.

I think every position should be checked with something like a quest pro with the passthrough on 50% opacity. Can I match the perspective (align the floor with my room) and still sit, lie down, etc. and match my body to the actor? Can I do this while having my body in a relaxed natural position? Is the size of "my" body correct, are my legs roughly at the same size and is my virtual dick at the right place ?

I still see this going wrong all the time (it might be hard due to males having heads and all ) but imo this is the foundation for a good angle. I still often find positions where you cannot match the perspective: without breaking your neck, whithouth looking in the world at a strange angle, without being like a drone hovering just above the head of the male or when you match the floor your body is almost underneath you, etc.
Another thing that you'll often see is that the male body is in the wrong position relative to the origin of the camera. E.g. your body in the scene is to small, your head is not where it should be, the up down angle in relation to your body is unnatural or even impossible.

I think the SLR Originals are doing a pretty good job at this most of the time. But there are also times that it can be improved. Still, doing a "passthrough check" like mentioned in the above is essential imo.

fenderwq youre right and thats another area that could be improved. the up-down position of the camera relative to the body as well as the forward-back position need to look believable for maximum immersion. sometimes in standing positions the camera is too far forward of the body.

LordCrash People have different opinions, expectations, fantasies, perceptions. There is no way to make everyone happy with every scene, so simply allow different approaches and different ways of shooting stuf

What he said.

Philip I don't want that. I want a greater variety of positions, not one standard format. It gets boring. It would be nice to have the positions work better for immersion. To me, nothing breaks immersion more than a poorly shot scene of the woman coming in for a kiss and you can clearly see her kissing and tonguing air about 6 inches from where my face should be. I also wish directors would give us guys some credit, does a woman's fake moans and constant "oh that's sooooo big", etc. is a total turn off. Better they say nothing.

mookiemeatball kissing and tonguing air about 6 inches from where my face should be

I like the kissing up close as possible but kissing into the cam, cuz sometimes the model will kiss where about the mouth would be if the camera had a mouth,

kiss into the cam

dango789 hate the last one too far away