- Edited
Anyone checked the SLR Originals upcoming scenes that have a trailer - The Horizontal Offset is way off (Approx -4) !
Quality control needs a bit of work i think - I'm guessing the full release will have these issues too.
Anyone checked the SLR Originals upcoming scenes that have a trailer - The Horizontal Offset is way off (Approx -4) !
Quality control needs a bit of work i think - I'm guessing the full release will have these issues too.
petex67 Will you guys be making Master HEVC available for PPV?
I wanna make sure before I make a purchase.
If there were HEVC masters, I wouldn't understand why we can't download them right now like before. The man said this is because there are none. So if they come back, I trust they will not be PPV but part of the premium subscription package again.
Silly-Sausage Some image distortion issues had been mentioned already in the comments of the Agatha scene when there was only a trailer. Was the full release okay? Haven't watched it yet.
SchnuppiLilac
HEVC Master Previews for 2 AV1 Scenes have already been dropped in this very thread.
Hey Silly-Sausage
just checked, and only trailer affected
the scene itself is fine
must be a mistake by editor who made trailer
i personally check every scene, but not the trailers.
thanks for pointing out
will be fixed soon
Manny_S Great news - thanks for checking
SchnuppiLilac Some image distortion issues had been mentioned already in the comments of the Agatha scene when there was only a trailer. Was the full release okay? Haven't watched it yet.
Not sure, i haven't watched it either
I am glad they've changed their mind. Still having trouble finding the old download button.
petex67 Does paying $6.99 even do anything right now?
Right now this is just for tipping but it will put smiles on faces for sure
@Manny_S
I adapted the image with a screenshot I just took from the video and you can see how smooth it is on our side and how there is a lack of detail. I indicated the same value as you in millisecond but my frame looks lightly different. However you can see the difference.
Here's the screen shoot took at 00:01:22:30 :
https://gifyu.com/image/bMw6K
I note you have one hour in your time code but it's the end of the video at this time and not the first minute.
boudaba Yeah huge difference. Just compare the tip of her nose in those photos for example.
This is what I've been trying to convey from the beginning. I'm no expert in video software, but you can see the difference between their version (studio) and the one we have (customer). It would be interesting if they compared with what they give to users and not from their assembly files.
boudaba you realise that the max8k is the streaming file that you can download?
why is your screenshot even worse then the max8k? its supposed to be the same
how do you make a screenshot?
if you simply go by shift+win+s (default windows screenshot shortcut) then its not ideal for comparison. that way you basically take a screenshot of whatever resolution your screen which is different from making a SNAPSHOT from a video, which just extract an 8k frame from it.
same happens if you take a screenshot from your headset
please do let me know what way you do it
otherwise it makes no sense to compare it to anything
I understand not providing 60-100+ GB vids to download for every video, but at least keep the streaming file as it was, just donโt provide it to download?
Iโd say its reasonable, no other studios provide the raw file except SLR in the past. But diminishing the main streaming quality in the process seems like a big setback
I love how everybody keeps acting dumb, like they dont know why people are complaining about the 8k max compressed download options now. You really expect people who prefer to download the maximum resolution file to pay 7 bucks more per scene if its not even that different? Are you mad? If this is how this website will go moving forward I will not support it anymore and I hope everyone else who also feels the same way will to. Give us the option to download the higher bitrate downloads
Manny_S There is barely any difference in file size between HEVC and AV1 and Max is compressed as hell. My PC cant seem to playback AV1 smoothly, so if you are not actually saving any significant amount of hosting space with those minimal savings in file sizes then what is the point? Image looks a little sharper? Then just crank up the damn sharpness ok the HEVC a little more and you cant even tell them apart. What a waste
VRSpy provides 90mbps files on their website.
RealJamVR/PorncornVR provides 60 mbps HBR on their website and a higher 100-120 mbps on their SLR releases (these are often 1-2 months later).
FuckPassVR provides 90mbps files on their website.
BadoinkVR sites provide 60mbps files.
POVR sites provide 40mbps files.
CzechVR sites provide 60mbps files.
VRHush provides 40mbps files on their website and 90mbps files on their SLR releases.
With this new change, SLR went from highest (120mbps+) to lowest (30mbps).
CzechVR used to provide 80mbps but went down to 60mbps. It was a sizeable but acceptable quality decrease.
With SLR, it feels like going from 3 star Michelin Gourmet Burgers to McDonalds while paying the same price.
There is no magic, lowering the bitrate will increase artifacts and smooth the image even in AV1.
ARPorn with similary content passthrough of SLR is at 75 mb/s in 10bits color with an acceptable file sizes about 20 gb.
Customers complained a few months ago and they increased their bitrate from 35 to 75 mb/s and switched to 10-bit color.
Masters are great but I can do without them if the birate is 60/70, This should be a basic quality here without paying extra monthly subscription price elsewhere just to have one video.