Your help is needed! SLRO Content - Vision 2024

rerun119

OliverDK I agree with the mature ladies not getting enough love. I don't know what the average age of a SLR customer is but I bet it is not 21. I'm in my 40's and like looking at women in their 30s and 40s. They are better actors and a lot of them are really hot.
Can we get a scene with a MILF that is not a stepson scene. Why does porn always act like the viewer is 20?
@doublevr do you know what the average age of a SLR viewer is?

Wendigo

rerun119 Well, I am 58 and I am not interested in middle-aged women. I have one of those at home already. Porn is fantasies about girls you can't obtain, not the past-their-prime mids.

vrguy69

Wendigo I can explain it to you, but I can't make you understand. If you think most users would be against a scene with Romi Rain b/c she's "past her peak," please reevaluate.

Silly-Sausage

More teens please, definitely not enough - but seriously just get a nice balance, don't go overboard one month with Milfs and the next with Teens, as we all get pissed off - Keep it balanced throughout the month.

But selfishly more teens please filmed by the best director Alex Nash IMO

Also personally i'm definitely starting to notice a lot more high profile porn stars either retiring or moving over to another platform and this is affecting my enjoyment and end up going back to older scenes as the newer models are not for me.

Hopefully this is just a blip in the matrix and some more cute newbies will appear out of now where and stay in the business longer than a few months (selfishly the Dakota Tyler situation still pisses me off) but i don't blame her.

stst12

Taboo content.

phyuggene

tmynx Also, when I mean MILF I mean women in their 30s and 40s. I think sometimes people associate MILFs with women in their 50s and beyond.

MILFs I'd love to see with their own SLR scenes would be:
Ava Addams, Brandi Love, Jewels Jade, Isabelle Deltore, Richelle Ryan, Tiffany Mynx (longshot and probably retired).

Brandi Love: 51 in a couple of weeks
Jewels Jade: 52
Tiffany Mynx: 52

Wendigo

hypertsunaz the reason is because you simply want more content catered to your tastes

I don't want the amount of content I like to DECREASE. There is a difference there.

hypertsunaz Haven't seen anyone request in this thread for someone over 50, idk what you're talking about there.

phyuggene tmynx Also, when I mean MILF I mean women in their 30s and 40s. I think sometimes people associate MILFs with women in their 50s and beyond.

MILFs I'd love to see with their own SLR scenes would be:
Ava Addams, Brandi Love, Jewels Jade, Isabelle Deltore, Richelle Ryan, Tiffany Mynx (longshot and probably retired).

Brandi Love: 51 in a couple of weeks
Jewels Jade: 52
Tiffany Mynx: 52

hypertsunaz You did sign up for a site like that, but you didn't know it.

Nope. I couldn't care less about any of the other stuff they do - then and now. I signed up for high-quality SLR Originals with the aesthetic they displayed then. I wouldn't bitch about all the other distractions they get involved in if they kept the quality and aesthetic of Originals the same, but they've cannabilized and trashed them to accomodate everything else.

Wendigo

tmynx There are already sites dedicated to this content (NAVR, MilFVR). Why not just go over there if you want to see them? I subbed to SLR because they tend to book younger models. I don't sub to NAVR or MilFVR because I don't want that content. But now, people want to change the content I subbed for into the content I refused to pay for and typically avoid. I will never understand people who sub to a site that doesn't do content they want - when there are sites that DO content they want - and then complain that the site doesn't do enough of what they want.

Who exactly is raining on parades?

Silly-Sausage

Wendigo ? I subbed to SLR because they tend to book younger models. I don't sub to NAVR or MilFVR because I don't want that content

I subbed exactly cause of this, if SLR want to sway the other way, that's fine, but don' t expect me to come along for the ride.

Just get the balance right and don't upset people and go all in one way or the other.

BTW teens is the right way 🙂

OliverDK

Wendigo NAVR isn't NA of old anymore as they hardly shoots milfs anymore. They just do regular pornstars. Not to mention the use the imo worst male talent for VR. MilfVR has become a autopilot of unimaginative boring rinse and repeat scenes.

Fair enough that you don't like milfs/mature of course but just wanted to point out that as a milf/mature fan those two sites are at least in my case uninteresting. That's of course why I would like to see more of that here on SLR - the raw taboo series was interesting with scenes like the ones starring Penny Barber. Modern Relationship another example. However for one reason or another SLR have dampened the production of such content.

hypertsunaz

Wendigo It's always the fans of petite and teen type of models that push for all in on that, in contrast to fans of the opposing features that would most of the time like to see a balance, which SLR has had (though not always). Before all the directors were purged it was clear certain directors had their own niche so SLR was never focused on teens and petite models only. Perhaps you subbed during that period after Alex Mack left. Why don't you just sub to 18vr, WankzVR, VirtualTaboo (which now focuses on teens), or POVR then or are you just a hypocrite? And you're twisting people's words. Silly-Sausage was for having a balance. And Doublevr was talking about PRODUCTION widely not casting.

theHobbit

Wendigo SLRO isn't about the kind of girls you describe, it never has been. It only seems like that because when other directors cast girls that are not the kind you like, you and your little group throw your toys out of the pram and eventually those directors leave. In any case now we just pretty much have Nash and we are finally getting the Mack types (Sinatra Monroe - yum yum) as its good for business and there is a bit more balance there.

The reason why SLRO has to take these measures is because six of you folk can't stop complaining about the decisions that SLR make and you just end up shooting yourselves in your own feet when the directors that cast our kind of girls leave.

This is what raining on parades mean, we like our curvy chicks, deal with it lol. Also your argument is rubbish as usual - I could tell you to go join Badoink haha

Silly-Sausage

If Alex Nash continues to direct milfs then i won't be happy - Please get another director to do that stuff

He is amazing at what he does, but people want to change it - get a director to suit you and don't spoil it for us that don't like old, large, fake, women.

OliverDK

Silly-Sausage He is amzing at what he does, but people want to change it - get a director to suit you and don't spoil it for us that don't like old, fat, fake women

Change what? He literally shot all the Penny Barber scenes afaik. He even has a Penny Barber scene on his own studio page as the first scene there. She's a well known milf/mature actress.

Silly-Sausage

OliverDK Penny Barber

Who ? never heard of her, i've watched porn too long to remember - however i could list hundreds of girls you have never heard of, but that would be childish

I used to love all porn, and now the diversity vermin are going to spoil this too

Silly-Sausage

tmynx Regardless, I believe we all deserve to live out our fantasies and tastes and all I am hoping is for a healthy balance of content.

Totallly agree, balance is the way forward - please employ another SLR director to film milfs, fake tits, lips, tatooes, larger girls etc and let Alex do what he does best.

OliverDK

Silly-Sausage My confusion: you are claiming you will cancel if Alex Nash continues to shoot milfs and then say people are trying to change him?... how can we change him into something he already is given he has many scenes involving milfs? If you don't know Penny Barber, then there's from the top of my head Pristine Edge, Bunny Madison, Charlie Phoenix, Lexi Luna, etc.

Fair enough you want him to not shoot milfs, it's just confusing to me you are arguing 'we want to change him', when from my perspective that's what you want him to do by never shooting milfs again 🤗

Wendigo

Silly-Sausage diversity vermin

Exactly. Pretty tired of everyone thinking that every site has to cater to every individual taste.

tmynx I counted around 5-6 people in this thread who mention wanting more either MILFs

Wow! 5 or 6 people! That's definitely critical mass that demands change lol

tmynx As OliverDK just stated, NAVR and MILFVR have all been disappointing in the past couple years

Have you considered that that is because, as doublevr said, the limited market for that type of content is already oversaturated, and NAVR/MiLF are failing to make money on it? That's a great reason not to do it here, since we are already hemorraghing subs due to PT nonsense taking over half the schedule.

OliverDK

Wendigo Have you considered that that is because, as doublevr said, the limited market for that type of content is already oversaturated, and NAVR/MiLF are failing to make money on it?

NAVR started to bleed members when they pushed their pricing structure shenanigans some years ago. Without a doubt they lost countless subs on that and eventually had to pull it back but the damage was kind of done. After that it's been VR free fall and a turn towards 'not shooting milfs' in VR and focus on regular pornstars obviously hasn't turned the ship around in regards to VR as they have kept reducing weekly updates.

On top of that NAVR has refused to fix thr issues with their setup of a blurry lens. Not to mention they insist on using cockzillas in VR which arguably many VR viewers find unappealing. In other words their VR issues most likely lies elsewhere than milfs not being popular in VR. NA after all build their entire brand on milfs.

The fact that MilfVR can keep updating with sterile autopilot rinse and repeat scenes and yet still exist, just speaks to me of a lack of serious competition rather than a saturated market.

The more likelihood imo for the lack of milfs was what one person involved in the industry said a few years back on reddit; high quality milf talents are either under exclusive contract or rather expensive. Furthermore the most popular milfs is in the process of or were retired completely. 'New' milfs to replace them has been in short supply as many of those popular pornstar that reached the right age simply jumped on the Onlyfans, Loyalfans, etc. wagon and won't shoot b/g scenes or again locked in exclusive contracts or very expensive.

So it's far easier and more importantly cheaper to pump out scenes from a sea of either cheap desperate teens that are trying to make a name for themselves or a high quantity of more popular names that hasn't quite found other pastures yet.

This was kind of backed by VirtualTaboo that stated a few years ago that milfs/matures indeed were in high asking demand but it got increasingly difficult and expensive to hire them. This answer came ironically from a discussion of why they seemed to shift focus towards teens instead of milfs.

My point with all of this is that the reason for the lack of milfs/matures in VR are likely found elsewhere than a lack of demand. All of the above could be wrong of course. I can't verify anything as I'm not an expert. I just pick up what I read here and there by insiders and I've also written with high quality talent on Onlyfans and they kind of confirm the above.

Furthermore I do find it hard to believe that a category that has continuously been represented in the top searches and watch list on free pornsites for over a decade worldwide now, somehow is not in demand in VR. Could be of course, I just doubt it.

vrguy69

hypertsunaz
I certainly wouldn't expect SLR to become exclusively Milfs nor do I desire it, but people insinuating there isn't a demand for it are really grasping at straws here. Plenty of metrics to back that up outside of this thread. In the end, variety should win out and I expect it will. It's impossible to please everyone, but I do commend SLR for having more variety in body types than in their earlier years, but there will always be some detractors.

Wendigo

hypertsunaz Perhaps you subbed during that period after Alex Mack left.

I subbed in 2020, when SLR booked hot, fit, young talent. I hated every minute of Mack's tenure, and I am overjoyed that he is gone. Should have kept vrfanservice over simsense as well. I don't commend SLR for trying to please everyone, as the quality and number of the things I subbed for decrease all the time. McDonald's has been successful for decades because when you go there, the menu is generally the same (other countries vary from each other, but little variation within countries) and you know exactly what you are going to get at what price. The burger joints that add smoothies and cookies and sanwiches and fried rolls and sushi and yogurt etc etc etc generally sell shittier versions of everything since they can't focus on doing one thing excellently. This is why "quality" is at the top of the list in this post, and niches and cute new tech gimmicks are at the bottom. SLR quality has declined as they have tried to please everyone at the same time.

realudontknowme

Man! I just wanna see hot chicks. Teens and Milfs.

SchnuppiLilac

Wendigo I subbed in 2020, when SLR booked hot, fit, young talent

Maybe you have hidden some videos but it is just not true that SLR started off as a teen site (or have ever claimed that they wanted to be). The first performers are all in their 30s now and there were quite a few others following that do not fit this description. OnTheTelly shot mixed age and body types, and so did Alex Mack.

hypertsunaz

Wendigo but you fail to see that casting (is at the top btw) and quality are not mutually exclusive? Just say you want more content that is catered to you and not beat around the bush with bullshit, it'll be more understandable. It's not the first discussion on this topic, I've seen it multiple times on this forum. Also yeah, that's only the case with the shittier mcdonalds in some countries. I love the limited exclusive and experimental stuff mcdonalds does in countries like Singapore, Japan, etc.

theHobbit

Wendigo The burger joints that add smoothies and cookies and sanwiches and fried rolls and sushi and yogurt etc etc etc generally sell shittier versions of everything since they can't focus on doing one thing excellently

yeah you can get most of that at McDonalds too because they diversified hahahah 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 so there goes that rubbish logic.

Niteflyte

Wendigo McDonald's has been successful for decades because when you go there, the menu is generally the same

Why am I not surprised to see you alluding to Mickey D's as an ideal in your arguments. Good grief some people and their love for toxicity.

Personally speaking my preference is for young, fit, attractive girls but at the same time diversity is out strength! At least, that's what I've been told over and over again. But for a large gateway VR site, I think a large variety and exploring that variety is what will take place if you're on a path for market growth. Of course, the type of people who eat Mickey D's (like a billion other NPCs) every day aren't interested in crazy things like "growth".

Wendigo

SchnuppiLilac Well, I didn't say "teen". I said "young, hot, fit". Actresses approaching 30 fit that description just fine. Actresses I've seen requested in this thread that are over 50 do NOT. Actresses with giant breasts that would be somewhat normal size if they lost 70 or 80 pounds do NOT. Actresses with freakish silicone asses, lips, and breasts that defy gravity with the nipples pointing in unnatural ways do NOT. Actresses with more tatoo than skin do NOT.

I've been watching it for 4 years now - people keep saying "include this or that thing! It's not fair that you don't please me!" and with every new thing they include, the site gets shittier by the day. If they shoot 1 MilF, 1 tatted up model, 1 silicon thing, 1 BBW, 1 passthrough, and one young fit model evey release cycle - and they continue to release 1 or two videos a week, that means I get one video I like every month. Hell, that means everyone gets one vid they like every month. Less, actually, since they insist on releasing a PT every week, and split the other Originals around all the DEI demands. And yes, I've tried PT. Yes, I have a Q3 and a QPro. Yes, it still sucks. No, it isn't immersive. No, it's not the "next big thing". It's a novelty, and like all novelties, the shine rubs off pretty quickly. Yes, I am aware of the "this is only the beginning! The tech will get better!" argument, but that depands on tech being able to accomplish things that it won't for quite a while, and for SLR to exhibit fine-tuning, attention to detail, and top-down quality control that they haven't exhibited in quite some time.

I didn't sign up for a site that shoots every kind of porn under the sun and includes something I like once in a while. I don't think many people do. You can crow about all the other sites that are included here, but let's be honest - most of them are amateur trash that no one would subscribe to on their own.

« Previous Page Next Page »