Your help is needed! SLRO Content - Vision 2024

hypertsunaz Perhaps you subbed during that period after Alex Mack left.

I subbed in 2020, when SLR booked hot, fit, young talent. I hated every minute of Mack's tenure, and I am overjoyed that he is gone. Should have kept vrfanservice over simsense as well. I don't commend SLR for trying to please everyone, as the quality and number of the things I subbed for decrease all the time. McDonald's has been successful for decades because when you go there, the menu is generally the same (other countries vary from each other, but little variation within countries) and you know exactly what you are going to get at what price. The burger joints that add smoothies and cookies and sanwiches and fried rolls and sushi and yogurt etc etc etc generally sell shittier versions of everything since they can't focus on doing one thing excellently. This is why "quality" is at the top of the list in this post, and niches and cute new tech gimmicks are at the bottom. SLR quality has declined as they have tried to please everyone at the same time.

Wendigo but you fail to see that casting (is at the top btw) and quality are not mutually exclusive? Just say you want more content that is catered to you and not beat around the bush with bullshit, it'll be more understandable. It's not the first discussion on this topic, I've seen it multiple times on this forum. Also yeah, that's only the case with the shittier mcdonalds in some countries. I love the limited exclusive and experimental stuff mcdonalds does in countries like Singapore, Japan, etc.

Wendigo Have you considered that that is because, as doublevr said, the limited market for that type of content is already oversaturated, and NAVR/MiLF are failing to make money on it?

NAVR started to bleed members when they pushed their pricing structure shenanigans some years ago. Without a doubt they lost countless subs on that and eventually had to pull it back but the damage was kind of done. After that it's been VR free fall and a turn towards 'not shooting milfs' in VR and focus on regular pornstars obviously hasn't turned the ship around in regards to VR as they have kept reducing weekly updates.

On top of that NAVR has refused to fix thr issues with their setup of a blurry lens. Not to mention they insist on using cockzillas in VR which arguably many VR viewers find unappealing. In other words their VR issues most likely lies elsewhere than milfs not being popular in VR. NA after all build their entire brand on milfs.

The fact that MilfVR can keep updating with sterile autopilot rinse and repeat scenes and yet still exist, just speaks to me of a lack of serious competition rather than a saturated market.

The more likelihood imo for the lack of milfs was what one person involved in the industry said a few years back on reddit; high quality milf talents are either under exclusive contract or rather expensive. Furthermore the most popular milfs is in the process of or were retired completely. 'New' milfs to replace them has been in short supply as many of those popular pornstar that reached the right age simply jumped on the Onlyfans, Loyalfans, etc. wagon and won't shoot b/g scenes or again locked in exclusive contracts or very expensive.

So it's far easier and more importantly cheaper to pump out scenes from a sea of either cheap desperate teens that are trying to make a name for themselves or a high quantity of more popular names that hasn't quite found other pastures yet.

This was kind of backed by VirtualTaboo that stated a few years ago that milfs/matures indeed were in high asking demand but it got increasingly difficult and expensive to hire them. This answer came ironically from a discussion of why they seemed to shift focus towards teens instead of milfs.

My point with all of this is that the reason for the lack of milfs/matures in VR are likely found elsewhere than a lack of demand. All of the above could be wrong of course. I can't verify anything as I'm not an expert. I just pick up what I read here and there by insiders and I've also written with high quality talent on Onlyfans and they kind of confirm the above.

Furthermore I do find it hard to believe that a category that has continuously been represented in the top searches and watch list on free pornsites for over a decade worldwide now, somehow is not in demand in VR. Could be of course, I just doubt it.

OliverDK

The more likelihood imo for the lack of milfs was what one person involved in the industry said a few years back on reddit; high quality milf talents are either under exclusive contract or rather expensive. Furthermore the most popular milfs has been or were retiring completely or from B/G scenes. 'New' milfs to replace them were in short supply as many of those popular pornstar that reached the right age simply jumped on the Onlyfans, Loyalfans, etc. wagon or again locked in exclusive contracts. So it's far easier and more importantly cheaper to pump out scenes from a sea of either cheap desperate teens that are trying to make a name for themselves or a high quantity of more popular names that hasn't quite found other pastures yet. This was kind of backed by VirtualTaboo that stated a few years ago that milfs/matures indeed were in high asking demand but it got increasingly difficult and expensive to hire them. This answer came ironically from a discussion of why they seemed to shift focus towards teens instead of milfs. My point with all of this is that the reason for the lack of milfs/matures in VR are likely found elsewhere than a lack of demand. All of the above could be wrong of course. I can't verify anything as I'm not an expert. I just pick up what I read here and there by insiders and I've also written with high quality talent on Onlyfans and they kind of confirm the above.

This makes a lot of sense.

SchnuppiLilac Well, I didn't say "teen". I said "young, hot, fit". Actresses approaching 30 fit that description just fine. Actresses I've seen requested in this thread that are over 50 do NOT. Actresses with giant breasts that would be somewhat normal size if they lost 70 or 80 pounds do NOT. Actresses with freakish silicone asses, lips, and breasts that defy gravity with the nipples pointing in unnatural ways do NOT. Actresses with more tatoo than skin do NOT.

I've been watching it for 4 years now - people keep saying "include this or that thing! It's not fair that you don't please me!" and with every new thing they include, the site gets shittier by the day. If they shoot 1 MilF, 1 tatted up model, 1 silicon thing, 1 BBW, 1 passthrough, and one young fit model evey release cycle - and they continue to release 1 or two videos a week, that means I get one video I like every month. Hell, that means everyone gets one vid they like every month. Less, actually, since they insist on releasing a PT every week, and split the other Originals around all the DEI demands. And yes, I've tried PT. Yes, I have a Q3 and a QPro. Yes, it still sucks. No, it isn't immersive. No, it's not the "next big thing". It's a novelty, and like all novelties, the shine rubs off pretty quickly. Yes, I am aware of the "this is only the beginning! The tech will get better!" argument, but that depands on tech being able to accomplish things that it won't for quite a while, and for SLR to exhibit fine-tuning, attention to detail, and top-down quality control that they haven't exhibited in quite some time.

I didn't sign up for a site that shoots every kind of porn under the sun and includes something I like once in a while. I don't think many people do. You can crow about all the other sites that are included here, but let's be honest - most of them are amateur trash that no one would subscribe to on their own.

hypertsunaz the reason is because you simply want more content catered to your tastes

I don't want the amount of content I like to DECREASE. There is a difference there.

hypertsunaz Haven't seen anyone request in this thread for someone over 50, idk what you're talking about there.

phyuggene tmynx Also, when I mean MILF I mean women in their 30s and 40s. I think sometimes people associate MILFs with women in their 50s and beyond.

MILFs I'd love to see with their own SLR scenes would be:
Ava Addams, Brandi Love, Jewels Jade, Isabelle Deltore, Richelle Ryan, Tiffany Mynx (longshot and probably retired).

Brandi Love: 51 in a couple of weeks
Jewels Jade: 52
Tiffany Mynx: 52

hypertsunaz You did sign up for a site like that, but you didn't know it.

Nope. I couldn't care less about any of the other stuff they do - then and now. I signed up for high-quality SLR Originals with the aesthetic they displayed then. I wouldn't bitch about all the other distractions they get involved in if they kept the quality and aesthetic of Originals the same, but they've cannabilized and trashed them to accomodate everything else.

Wendigo I'm not just talking about all the other stuff they do but casting as well. You're advocating for the amount of content other people like to decrease or stay as low as it has become, that's the issue hypocrite, because as mentioned before, SLR was never just a young, fit, teen whatever type of studio. You seem to pick and choose which statements to respond to and acknowledge. Look back 4 years ago, and you'll see they were casting a mix, including MILFs like Lauren Phillips, Tia Cyrus, Joanna Angel, LaSirena, Lexi Luna, etc. This was before people started suggesting casting too. Thanks missed that guy's comment. The ONE guy you quoted though, in his first sentence, says he means mostly 30s and 40s and that other people think 50s, those 3 names are there but just outliers who btw aren't active or have exclusivity contracts. It's not even a huge deal, how many 50+ pornstars are there? It's not like they're gonna be casting them twice a month to trigger you. All people are asking for is a good balance like before and my problem with you is that you started telling people to go to other websites but you could do the same as well.

Wendigo SLRO isn't about the kind of girls you describe, it never has been. It only seems like that because when other directors cast girls that are not the kind you like, you and your little group throw your toys out of the pram and eventually those directors leave. In any case now we just pretty much have Nash and we are finally getting the Mack types (Sinatra Monroe - yum yum) as its good for business and there is a bit more balance there.

The reason why SLRO has to take these measures is because six of you folk can't stop complaining about the decisions that SLR make and you just end up shooting yourselves in your own feet when the directors that cast our kind of girls leave.

This is what raining on parades mean, we like our curvy chicks, deal with it lol. Also your argument is rubbish as usual - I could tell you to go join Badoink haha