Your help is needed! SLRO Content - Vision 2024

Personally thought Jessie Rogers from the "Cummitted To The Grind" scene was excellent.
No tattoos, no plastic, no injections. Other than her fake boobs(which aren't egregious), she's great!
Not sure if she's old enough for those looking for milfs though.

rerun119 there don't seem to be a lot of those story lines on SLR I'll give you that.

...wait, we're not supposed to be role-playing? i'm always pretending to be some fit young thing's stepdad, their music teacher, random plumber, etc. It's great fun!

Anyway, i signed up to SLR because of the scripts. Streaming, scripted VR sex is my goddess, so i'm all for as much variety as possible. I'll skip from the USA to Europe to Japan, experienced older ladies, cute young succubi, vanilla, BDSM, CGI, indoor, outdoor, wtvr, variety is the spice of life.

What's important for me really is just a good show. Some real enthusiasm. Some actual engagement with the scene. The scene has to draw me in, i wanna feel like i'm actually there. For that, you need good direction. SLR needs to get another excellent director or two on the books, ramp up production, take the strain off poor Alex. With more artistic helmsmen, they'll draw more talent, have more variety, tell more interesting stories, the rest will follow. i understand it's difficult to find good VR directors, so yeah, it's a bit of a quest, but there you go, that's the answer.

Obviously SLR has a brand to think of, and a lot of people like cute young things, so there's always gonna be a lot of that. All good, i love fucking cute young talent, and SLR has to survive. However, SLR has the size to branch out a little, and try to encompass some slightly niche things, occasionally, even if it's only 'MILF' (lol at the idea that a 31-year-old is 'MILF', i think i'm getting old...) or something fairly safe (a bit of latex occasionally, for example). It doesn't always have to be midget clown porn to be exciting!

But yeah, sort out an extra director or two first, the rest will follow...

Wendigo I've tried PT a LOT, since SLR has given over half the new releases to it. Every time I hope it gets better, and every time it sucks just as bad. People make the same repetitive comments on those videos over and over regarding what could be improved, and it never does. I've given up on trying to like it, and am currently of the opinion that SLR likes it because it is cheaper to film and they get cheap models most of the time.

I can't speak to the mind of SLR but were you around in the old VR days? That time we had belly button cameras, moaning men, dead limps actors, scale that was way off, no eye contact, looking at directors, no close-ups, bend neck syndrome and I could go on.

Listen I'm no fan of AR porn in it's current form. It has potential imo but the fact remains tgat the high quality VR scenes we have today came about as a consequence of a hardcore group of dedicated fans that offered constructive criticism and suggestions for years on the subreddit OculusNSFW when most studios were actually active there besides just advertising their scenes.

It took the better part of 2-3 years to get it all dialed it. AR porn is likely no different. I'm sure that there are dedicated fans that'll help get it better but I have no illusions that it will be great before all issues gets dialed in, ideas get implemented, etc.

And if the journey we had with VR is anything to go by that will undoubtful take time. Then there's a fair argument to be had if it's reasonable people should pay for that if they initially just signed up for VR.

OliverDK That time we had belly button cameras

VR Bangers still got it

Wendigo I also find it very presumptuous that if you don't like PT then you must has not been able to see it.
I had a Pimax 8kx (hands down way better than Quest 3, the FOV is unmatchable) before it broke. I couldn't watch PT so it was a complete waste of scenes for me. After the Pimax broke I got the old Quest 2 out and was excited to try PT because of some people saying how great it is. Then I bought a Quest 3 ( waiting on Pimax 12kx, fingers crossed that it does come out)

My conclusion is that it is ok, I don't love it like a really good Nash scene.
Since so many people make assumptions about PT, I'm going to assume that people that like it so much are young guys that haven't really had very many girls walk into their bedroom IRL. If you haven't had sex or a lot of sex in your own bed then PT might really be amazing to you. I'm no sex god but watching the same thing over and over in my bedroom get pretty boring really quick.

Also since the directors have complete control of the scenes and Nash hasn't been on here in months. Does any of this change anything?

trooowiii I think shooting with AR in mind will improve both AR and VR if AI passthrough sticks around. The finer details need to be perfected with AR, which I believe will translate over well to VR.

Only if there is a feedback loop and directors or editors are trying to improve their work, which doesn't seem to be the case right now for any studio.

trooowiii It was mostly to make a point. I have read multiple times that if you don't like PT then you must have not tried it on a good headset. I have seen many times people say "sorry that you are cheap and can't afford a Quest 3 to really see how good PT is" These are huge assumptions, It can't be that I just don't like it as much.
So I figure there must be some reason these people like seeing the same thing over and over in their bed that they love so much and I don't.

trooowiii One thing that will make regular better if they think about PT at the same time is the scaling. So many scenes the girls and everything in it is huge. I can't understand how people can watch giants in their headsets. Maybe they don't notice like I do. When you turn on PT it's like a 7ft tall 250 lb person crawling on top of you. This plagues half of all the studios on here.
That would be great if they had to fix scale. Other than that the scenes could be the same as always couldn't they be. With AI PT that is. As long as they get the distance and scale and the guy in the middle of the shot.

phyuggene Did they say why? Seems dumb to fire their best studio, which is also their only AR studio

tmynx I personally prefer VR, but I certainly don't think PT is complete trash or that it shouldn't exist. My main issue is the volume of PT scenes SLR currently puts out, especially while its still in the early stages. Considering these factors along with the data regarding PT vs. VR users, it should be about 1/3 of the content, but since SLR has a stranglehold on PT, it's been more like half recently, which in my opinion, is a little too much.

lolitovtb He was shooting for other sites so that might have had something to do with it. Otherwise I have no idea. To me he was the worst but each to their own

...i love the appeal of AR, but i hate the floaty dick thing. It's the main thing that puts me off. i'm fine adjusting scale and position in both AR and VR, and have no problems adjusting on the fly. Giant women and odd angles don't bother me in VR at all, i just see it as a close up, but the same adjustments in AR seems much more disconcerting to me.

i think the main issue, for me, is that every movement of the head is translated into the model moving against the background in AR, whereas in VR the model is constantly fixed against the background, so she doesn't move around in relation to it. i think that might be the crunch point in my head for immersion. Weird that i can take giant women, but not floaty ones, go figure.

On the odd occasion where i've dipped my toe i do find it fascinating, and would love to experience it more when the technology itself can self compensate for my issues. i'm a little bit behind the learning curve, so could someone please explain to me if "Full 6DoF" is gonna fix it? i assume this is where both the model is 'fixed' positionally in relation to the external environment? i know SLR is apparently working on it, does anyone know how close this solution is to fruition?

Also, like everyone else, i think having the SasyQVR peeps and similar doing some PT would look awesome, not having any dick at all would of course completely negate the floaty dick bit that puts me off. More AR strippers please... xD

InfiniteFun ...i love the appeal of AR, but i hate the floaty dick thing. It's the main thing that puts me off. i'm fine adjusting scale and position in both AR and VR, and have no problems adjusting on the fly. Giant women and odd angles don't bother me in VR at all

We all differ and I'm in the opposite boat. For example the floating dick doesn't bother me at all. I vastly prefer that than the AR porn where the entire male actor is visible. I can't stand that and frankly don't see the point in AR then.

That said wrong scaling and wrong distance in either VR or AR is a complete buzz kill for ne. Thankfully these days scale can sometimes be dialed in but wrong distances - especially too close can't as I can't zoom out and 'create' something that wasn't in the shoot to begin with. Zooming in is easier although like zooming out it will distort the image eventually.

trooowiii It's clear that you do not want any passthrough content being made

That is not even remotely true. I just have an issue with it being half of the content releases. If you were on an all PT site for a long term sub and they implemented something you didnt sign up and cut you releases in half wouldnt you be annoyed?