• SLR

  • LifestylesVR channel - CANCELED

LettucePoker Enlighten me, show me where Aidra Fox or Vanna Bardot or Ivy Wolfe or Elena K said " Jimmy sexually abused me" you can't cuz it was never said. Just assumed.

https://www.jezebel.com/its-gonna-be-softcore-porn-director-jimmy-lifestyles-a-1833262198

☝🏻
… @Aidra Fox weighed in: “jimmy is one of three directors on my no list for reasons exactly like this.” Performer Ivy Wolfe wrote in response to Hix, “He has done similar to me, and many other girls. Thank you.” Vanna Bardot tweeted: “Im so sorry this happened to you, I recently shot with jimmy as well and thought it was by far one of the most unprofessional sets I’ve been on.”…

So let’s level set here. The “new guy”’s argument is that because Aidra doesn’t say “he abused me” straight out, that makes her and everyone else but him full of shit? It doesn’t take a genius to read between the lines and conclude Aidra put him on her “no list” because she saw enough first hand on his sets to know the many girls Ivy and others mention weren’t lying. Aidra stayed clear of Wankz along with a lot of other highly sought talent. He’ll bring the same fate to SLR. How many times does this need to be spelled out?

    If someone is a consenting adult, knows his reputation and is still willing to work with him, well I won't stop either.

    Nor do I intend to unsubscribe to SLR over this, as there are many other studios, actresses, employees, personal, etc. and they shouldn't suffer from this situation imho.

    I intend to block Jimmy's channel, that way I assume he doesn't earn any money of me. That's what I can do.

      OliverDK that’s a very reasoned way to look at this. I guess the big question out there is how much is this all Jimmy’s thing, and he’s just bringing it here on an equal footing with other contributing studios? If that’s the case then your take is exactly right. What stands out though was the weighting this was originally given in the announcement that began this very thread. Bullet 2 announced what read a lot more like full-on collaboration to me… i.e. SLR enabling Jimmy to shoot, and that’s a very different thing isn’t it? “We are helping him out with setup.” Of course that all got downplayed when this news blew back hard.

      And it’s not like this should have been a shock. I remember double taking the temperature on this a few months ago and the reaction and advice then screamed “don’t do it”

        argyle43 Admin removed

        doublevr you've got a warning

        Wow. Okay. Well, I guess the next thing I say that you don’t like means I’m gone. Whatevs. I haven’t bothered with this forum for months … until this particular issue came up. Like others I’ve tried only to point out that working with that guy is likelier to hurt SLR than help it. You only hear what you want to, man, so all good. No loss to me if you kick me from this forum. I’ll just leave you with this I guess:

        https://thefulcrum.ca/opinions/why-censorship-does-not-work/

        Kick me. Don’t kick me. I’m done here too.

              doublevr with all due respect the only uncivil party here is you, and in turn SLR, for insisting in the face of MULTIPLE ACCUSERS that this man can somehow say something that will convince us that he 1.) didn’t do them or 2.) somehow won’t do it again.

              It’s utterly ludicrous.

              Why would all of these women risk being blacklisted and jeopardize their career for a fake accusation? Can you answer that with anything that isn’t a ridiculous conspiracy theory with no substance behind it?

              It’s 2024 the me too movement was supposed to make incidents like this abundantly clear, there is no reason or explanation for half a dozen or more women to lie about being sexually harassed, the only explanation is the man in question is a sexual harasser.

              And the only proper response is to unequivocally remove him from your platform and APOLOGIZE for these utterly ridiculous comments that feel like they are from 2004 not 2024. Is there no one else from SLR to speak to? Because double is all we can speak to I have zero confidence that this won’t happen again under your watch, due to your clearly and staunchly anti-performer and anti-woman stance.

              Let me be utterly clear even letting Jimmy “get a chance to speak” is you choosing a side. You should have just banned him from the platform and now you’re setting up a clear path for him to stay

                  Xipernosky doing things blindly doesn't solve the problem. Quite opposite.

                  Will see where it brings us.

                  Otherwise you are getting too much on yourself with no credible history. Enough of the same moralisation.

                      doublevr What exactly do you mean by credible history? That I have not posted in these forums except for this topic? Are members of the community that do not actively participate in the forums seen as less credible? A person who has been a customer for years/bought dozens of videos simply not credible?

                      As long as what someone says is backed by evidence and logic it will always be credible. Speaking of logic… You have not been able to adequately answer why several performers would risk their careers to claim someone is a sexual assaulter. There is no logical explanation other than he is one.

                      As for your claim that my previous post and all my posts can be hand waved away by it being moralization, if you recognize that our values are at odds and you resent that I am lecturing you as to why your morals are wrong you should also realize a FORUM is exactly the place to challenge and change another’s values and attitudes and beliefs ESPECIALLY when a large part of the community believes you are wrong about what is right and wrong.