• ContentSLR
  • Should we keep filming Passthrough if AI PT is getting better?

I believe that passthrough hasn't been fully perfected yet. The camera angles need improvement, and even with some alpha passthrough videos, the cutoff isn't sharp, which diminishes the immersion for me.

pretty much what the first two posters said, if pt ai gets to the point of native pt, then sure.

Whatever the factors are that are attracting people to PT, they seem to outweight all the masking flaws and other issues that plague that type of content.

Not sure what any of this PT masks and dedicated layers stuff means. If you’re saying that you can shoot normal scenes though and AI can convert them to PT after the fact, then yes you should do that as then everyone’s happy. People who want to watch normal VR porn are happy and the PT crowd can watch it in PT too.

Ignoring the fact that I can imagine filming a scene which focus is solely POV AR dedicated will most likely always be superior to a POV VR scene that is converted to POV AR via AI I would say that unless AI can remove the male actor's body too, AI POV AR will and is altogether useless to me. I've tried but I simply can't watching POV AR porn where the male actor's body is visible as it (to me) defeats the purpose of POV AR porn in the first place. Fair enough some can ignore the guy or whatever but to me such POV AR porn is uninteresting and I rather just watch regular POV VR any day.

    OliverDK Yeah, body in is kinda pointless. But just turn on non pov mode and the male body will be removed. I think the non pov mode should actually be the pov mode or they should rename it to body in body out or something. The problem is that the stunt cock will also be removed a lot of the time.

      You're years away from AI passthrough which matches native passthrough. I don't think you're going to get there until you can use existing tools from Adobe etc which haven't been developed yet.

      Yes, please. At least until we get a SLR Originals PT w/ Scarlett Mae 😜

      parsec Yeah, once a cam model can directly control the user's sex toy by giving a dildo a HJ/BJ with realtime movement duplication, thus getting us a huge leap further towards real virtual sex, it's game over for my credit card.

      I chatted to the Teledong engineer about this on Reddit, and he suggested it would only really work well in private mode because every connection would have to sync the delay, if that makes sense. Something like this would be transformative.

        I said this before but i don't think AI generated ar videos will look as good as the alpha productions AR videos.

        The AI AR videos are pretty good, still needs sum tweaking but over all I found a few I enjoyed, but at the moment the alpha ar videos just look way better in pass through, so...keep on filming alpha AR videos? YES!

        But I'm hopeful the AI AR videos will get better! 🤞

        vrpicasso that's cool! I travel a lot and it would be nice to be able to connect with the wife through something like this.

        I would be really surprised if it would take less than 5 years to get up to the original level. So coming years I don't think AI will be a true alternative.

        There are too many scenes where the male model's arms would move all over the screen to touch the body. Wouldn't that interfere with the AI passthrough? They would have silhouettes of just random arms, hands, and fingers throughout the video.

        Just do a mix.
        Those that love PT can get both "high quality" greenroom/grayman plus the AI PT versions.
        Those who pass on PT get less "she looks hot...dammmit! PT only" frustration.
        Those who love both... well, minimal change for them I guess.

        Plus continuing with both forms of PT will allow for more direct-comparison feedback.

        doublevr Since you are removing the male performer post-filming and also don't want them using hands, are there any reasons why you need a male performer at all? Could you use a green tommy torso instead?