Data insights
- Edited
doublevr That's interesting, thanks for sharing.
So just over 1/3 of people use PT.
- Edited
doublevr Is PT the dotted line? Because if PT is the solid line then it looks like PT grew slightly less than regular watch time over that period
Looking back at the last few months, around 50% of SLR Originals content has been PT. I would assume that some of the growth in PT viewing could be attributed to that high proportion of PT scenes (more PT content = more PT watch time). If that's true then it would suggest that a decrease in the proportion of PT scenes should lead to a decrease in PT growth.
I think it would be interesting to see what happens to PT growth once the backlog of Simsense PT scenes are exhausted. If it continues growing then it really is as popular as it appears to be.
.
.
doublevr Do you have the percentage of PT users per devices supporting PT? Does the 'not PT users' percentage also contain subscribers who are completely inactive?
Looking at the recent SLRO scenes, Training Day has significantly more views than the Agatha or Briana VR scenes around it. How does this fit into 2/3 not using PT?
SchnuppiLilac Looking at the recent SLRO scenes, Training Day has significantly more views than the Agatha or Briana VR scenes around it. How does this fit into 2/3 not using PT?
How do you figure that? Training Day and the Briana scenes both have 2.7K views while the Agatha scene has 3.2K views and was released later.
phyuggene View counts are shown on the individual video pages. 41 K for Training Day. Less likes but more views.
SchnuppiLilac Oh right, I was looking at likes 
what's the data on people cancelling vs new users
- Edited
I still check out new PT scenes even though I don't use PT. Thats because so many fresh faces are solely PT. Not to mention half of the recent SLRO are PT. I can't imagine that I am alone in that. Don't rush to judgement about what those numbers mean.
On the other hand...if the PT users only represent 1/3 of the base, why are 1/2 of the newest SLRO releases PT? Shouldn't PT scenes be 1/3 to match the user distribution?
fuccaneer On the other hand...if the PT users only represent 1/3 of the base, why are 1/2 of the newest SLRO releases PT? Shouldn't PT scenes be 1/3 to match the user distribution
Not if it's a growing trend. Then it makes sense to focus on it to capitalize on a expected growing audience. One could of course argue AR porn is a phase and the novelty will wear off. I can't say of course but I do remember similar words was spoken about VR porn about 10 years ago and look were we are today.
- Edited
OliverDK Not if it's a growing trend. Then it makes sense to focus on it to capitalize on a expected growing audience.
There's a big assumption there. There's no guarantee that it will continue to grow. The slope illustrated coincides pretty closely with the release and adoption of the Quest 3. Given that continued sales of Quest 3 have not come close to projected numbers, the "I just got a Q3, let's try PT" cohort is likely going to shrink. With reduced new users, will PT retention/reuse be able to sustain the missed growth and keep the upward momentum?
Okokok, cherry-picking, fine. The main idea of SLRO focusing heavily on PT to serve a growing trend may make sense as a business gamble--and we all know doublevr is ALL-IN on PT, but does it makes business sense to alienate a significant user base like non-PT users? We can argue degree until we're blue in the face, but the disappointment is real.
fuccaneer With reduced new users, will PT retention/reuse be able to sustain the missed growth and keep the upward momentum?
I have no idea if AR porn will continue to increase in growth or it will fade out but I'm actually personal quite surprised 1/3 of users are AR users. That's higher than I expected given the number of headsets capable of AR and the still limited numbers of scenes.
- Edited
noice 
Memo: Quest 3 was tracked incorrectly as Quest Pro before got fixed