[deleted]
doublevr users misusing recurring monthly sub instead of going non-recurring monthly
Another way of looking at this is a feature for individuals who pay to avoid the hassle of cancelling a service. Many companies have an equivalent tier.
Upcoming price and download limit change
- Edited
[deleted] these shouldn't not be by algorithms, but I've asked the team to look into it.
Would be really appreciated to come up with a dedicated thread and post all the samples. We really want to find out what's going on there
If it's just focus then it's a camera matter. Having one lens out of focus is a typical issue with many cameras
I'm a little confused, are you thinking of reducing the download limit for any new subscription?
Or are you introducing a new "lite" cheaper tier subscription that has a reduced downloads limit and still keeping the regular priced tier with 30 downloads per 6 days?
[deleted]
- Edited
In some videos the left lens looks blurred, and in others it's the right lens. The effect of blurring from a VR180 camera looks diffrerent from what you're seeing here, in that typically the blur effect is limited to one part of the lens. Additionally, the blur effect on the one side is not counterbalanced by a sharpening effect on the other side, as seen in the Baberotica films.
Here's where due to blurring a film really needs to be re-shot. Here we have superb lighting, direction, and acting all ruined by a blurred lens.
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/the-shop-25216
[deleted]
- Edited
Back to my point, though, a lower priced tier makes sense, especially one at the same price as POVR, provided that SLR can process payments in the same way to accept giftcards. Times have been made intentionally challenging for large groups of people. A $10.00 tier for either streaming only or 30 downloads over the course of a month would be appealing. You could make it one video a day and there would be many days where the subscriber will be too busy to download anything, so that subscription plan would be financially feasible.
Nevertheless, the current plans make sense even if individuals don't subscribe every month. I can only offer the perspective of someone who has returned to SLR for several subscriptions. There are months where I download very little, and other ones, like this one directly coinciding with my purchase of a Quest 3, that I download more than usual. The profit will likely balance out in the end.
As feedback, I prefer SLR over POVR since the site is less sleazy and allows for downloads of the 'original' files. However, SLR's casting as of late has been very poor, or at least not according to my tastes. The women you cast don't have to be young or anorexically thin, but their tattoos, if any, should be tasteful, and the plastic surgery, if any, also tasteful.
Just do a 299$ Lifetime and your member count will explode
Hairsational Prices only have come down on SLR, a lot. Almost half for annual subs.
- Edited
[deleted] I checked the source video, the one before SLR transcodes it, and the issue is with the source.
Feel free to download the studio file and see for yourself.
Would be totally weird if it would be the SLR transcoding because both sides are transcoded as one, not each eye separately.
[deleted]
Rakly3 Would be totally weird if it would be the SLR transcoding
What's weird is that this blur / sharpening effect seems visible in at least 15 videos from BaberoticaVR and SuckMeVR, produced by the same company. This problem recurs for over five months of SLR content, beginning with this video: https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/ukranian-sara-bork-spreads-her-legs-and-fingers-her-big-meaty-pussy-35124.
I wonder how this has gone unnoticed for so long. I also wonder what accounts for the lens switch.
The effect is less noticeable in HereSphere.
[deleted]
- Edited
doublevr It has to be checked
That must be the best job in the porn industry: quality assurance manager.
- Edited
Rakly3 Imgur doesn't support pics with naked people anymore. You can upload them but they all get deleted within a day.
LordCrash NA is not the best example of a company doing better than SLR for downloads. It's the only studio where I was banned for using a download manager (others had this happen too). With a different account, I was suspended for downloading too many scenes (and it wasn't that many, my internet's shit). They're a joke.
- Edited
It looks like they added digital sharpening to only the right video. Look at the glare circle on the bed post and how there is a false dark ring around the white area where digital contrast was enhanced. A great capture from the camera would not need to rely on digital sharpening after the capture.
Definitely would be annoying to have such a difference for each eye when watching.
ItsForTheArticles That was my observation too. The right one is over-sharpened and has bad ringing artifacts.
sylvan My account was suspended after I downloaded too many - always one after another - without using a download manager (after previously being banned for using IDM). They may claim there's no download limit but that's not my experience. Awful company.