You may want to reduce the download limit, but what you really need is a reduction in speed for heavy downloaders. With a slow connection of 2 MPS it woud be difficult for anyone to reach the SLR download limit. Many users have connection speeds of 20 MPS. One solution might be to limit download speeds after a certain number of downloads have been reached. If the user can afford to have a 20 MPS connection, they can pay extra for additional downloads.
A significant number of films were broken due to a blurred lens. Every single film uploaded by the company behind BaberoticaVR, including their new studio, is unwatchable either due to a blurred lens or a faulty compression algorithm.
Hairsational it's the stupid people that are also loud as fuck.
You better spend some time figuring things out before bringing your nonsense all over the place
doublevr sorry
Hairsational no worries 
Hairsational editors taking artistic liberties
No, the films are broken. It's a problem with the algorithm.
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/doll-hole-masturbates-herself-in-vr-today-37124
Left = Blurred
Right = Sharpened
There have been many issues with SLR's algorithms. Videos from DeepInSex became inaccessible. There are ghost entries for content from 3D Pickup, https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/sis-best-friend-bored-horny-39123 .
there is that one lil thing...if you haven't jerked off to the clip more than once or at all? no need to download it
typically know within 90seconds if there are any whackable moments
extra storage space going to help, but still need to the whackable moments regardless.
doublevr users misusing recurring monthly sub instead of going non-recurring monthly
Another way of looking at this is a feature for individuals who pay to avoid the hassle of cancelling a service. Many companies have an equivalent tier.
[deleted] these shouldn't not be by algorithms, but I've asked the team to look into it.
Would be really appreciated to come up with a dedicated thread and post all the samples. We really want to find out what's going on there
If it's just focus then it's a camera matter. Having one lens out of focus is a typical issue with many cameras
I'm a little confused, are you thinking of reducing the download limit for any new subscription?
Or are you introducing a new "lite" cheaper tier subscription that has a reduced downloads limit and still keeping the regular priced tier with 30 downloads per 6 days?
In some videos the left lens looks blurred, and in others it's the right lens. The effect of blurring from a VR180 camera looks diffrerent from what you're seeing here, in that typically the blur effect is limited to one part of the lens. Additionally, the blur effect on the one side is not counterbalanced by a sharpening effect on the other side, as seen in the Baberotica films.
Here's where due to blurring a film really needs to be re-shot. Here we have superb lighting, direction, and acting all ruined by a blurred lens.
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/the-shop-25216
Back to my point, though, a lower priced tier makes sense, especially one at the same price as POVR, provided that SLR can process payments in the same way to accept giftcards. Times have been made intentionally challenging for large groups of people. A $10.00 tier for either streaming only or 30 downloads over the course of a month would be appealing. You could make it one video a day and there would be many days where the subscriber will be too busy to download anything, so that subscription plan would be financially feasible.
Nevertheless, the current plans make sense even if individuals don't subscribe every month. I can only offer the perspective of someone who has returned to SLR for several subscriptions. There are months where I download very little, and other ones, like this one directly coinciding with my purchase of a Quest 3, that I download more than usual. The profit will likely balance out in the end.
As feedback, I prefer SLR over POVR since the site is less sleazy and allows for downloads of the 'original' files. However, SLR's casting as of late has been very poor, or at least not according to my tastes. The women you cast don't have to be young or anorexically thin, but their tattoos, if any, should be tasteful, and the plastic surgery, if any, also tasteful.
Just do a 299$ Lifetime and your member count will explode
Hairsational Prices only have come down on SLR, a lot. Almost half for annual subs.
[deleted] I checked the source video, the one before SLR transcodes it, and the issue is with the source.
Feel free to download the studio file and see for yourself.
Would be totally weird if it would be the SLR transcoding because both sides are transcoded as one, not each eye separately.
Rakly3 Would be totally weird if it would be the SLR transcoding
What's weird is that this blur / sharpening effect seems visible in at least 15 videos from BaberoticaVR and SuckMeVR, produced by the same company. This problem recurs for over five months of SLR content, beginning with this video: https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/ukranian-sara-bork-spreads-her-legs-and-fingers-her-big-meaty-pussy-35124.
I wonder how this has gone unnoticed for so long. I also wonder what accounts for the lens switch.
The effect is less noticeable in HereSphere.
