• SLR

  • Resetting Originals production

doublevr It feels like mainstream content production is saturated. Too many people are shooting very similar scenes and there's very little innovation on production side of things.

Just a suggestion:

There's a ton of creators that do POV taboo roleplaying virtual sex with success in 2D land. I've been in contact with some of them on eg. X and OnlyFans and they do express interest in VR but they simply don't have the knowhow to do it.

What can these people bring to VR? Well they obviously have large fanbases but what's better is they know how to act out a engaging POV roleplay. They are productive. They are creative. They think out of the box. Just try and take a look at Sydney Harwin - she's a creative and productive powerhouse making at times full feature almost 2 hour long mom/son roleplays all on her own. Recently she managed to gather 25 mom/son roleplaying actress from around the globe in one long 4 hours movie and got it all done within 2-3 weeks. That's quite a feat.

Penny Parker is among these superstars - look at the success of her scenes on your platform. There's clearly a market for it and you could be the provider of it in VR/AR. There's so many names you could look at - Sydney Harwin, Jodi West, Mindy Mink, Bettie Bondage, Xev Bellringer, Sloan Moans, Rhea Sweet, Kelly Payne, Larkin Love and the list goes on and on.

You have the knowhow these superstars in their field lack. Taboo roleplays are clearly one of the most popular niches in porn. Why not try to establish contact with a couple of them, offer them advice, maybe even a setup and how to film correctly for VR and get them to release exclusively on SLR. It doesn't even have to be 8K.

      InfiniteFun PT is just one aspect of VR, it has not replaced VR, it is new. It's just another way to view stuff with a VR headset, it has a niche appeal, just like VR does, and has many limitations at present, just like VR does.

      Friendly reminder that PT, by definition, is not VR.

          OliverDK You have the knowhow these superstars in their field lack. Taboo roleplays are clearly one of the most popular niches in porn. Why not try to establish contact with a couple of them, offer them advice, maybe even a setup and how to film correctly for VR and get them to release exclusively on SLR. It doesn't even have to be 8K.

          It's a great idea but I doubt it will happen. SLR seems to be known for its robust (or perhaps risk-averse) attitude to compliance, and there's a reason you don't generally see these performers doing proper taboo stuff for major studios, or when you do, it's very watered-down compared to their usual fare. The Alex Nash taboo stuff has been very hit and miss IMHO. Or you have Taboo VR Porn, which never misses an opportunity to drop 'step' into the dialogue every thirty seconds. I'm surprised there isn't a banner constantly scrolling across the top of the screen saying 'THESE CHARACTERS ARE NOT RELATED'.

          Also, you mention Sydney Harwin who is (mostly) a solo performer, at least in the stuff she puts on the tube sites - which IMHO is not great content for VR - as are many other taboo performers nowadays; and personally I could do without Tommy Torso or Derek Dildo in the scene either. Don't get me wrong, I love most of the performers you named there and others, like Brianna Beach or classic-era Rachel Steele (can't say I like the 'new' her very much, TBH) or Janet Mason; sadly many are now retired or inactive (Mandy Flores is missed). But it's not just about the performer in this particular niche, it's about the content, and I don't think SLR or any major site has the desire to push the boundaries beyond what the 'step' studios do already. Compliance is king and it's safer to go with what you know you can get away with, rather than take the risk of being the latest target of MasterCard or Visa's wrath. Smaller sites and individuals selling content on clip sites generally avoid that sort of scrutiny.

          I'll watch what happens with the Originals 'reboot' with interest, but my primary interest here is content aggregation and the provision of scripts, and provided there's content I want to watch with scripts I enjoy, I'll be happy. If studios start to pull their content because they want / need to increase revenue on their own sites, then it's the dismantling of Netflix all over again, and I will not be happy because I have zero interest in juggling several subscriptions to smaller sites every month.

            One of the most valuable resources that SLR has is its casting thread when users regularly bump their most preferred performers. If I were a competitor looking for who to cast next this would be one of the first places I would visit as it is a valuable resource that has been generated by a customer base that I had to pay no money for. SLR should revamp the requesting process so only they have exclusive access to who is being requested by its users.

            It's uncanny how some of the most requested performers, like Violet Myers, Harley Dean, Natasha Nice, Angie Faith, Sophia Leone, Kylie Page etc ended up on other competitor sites when there only exists a few places where this type of information can be requested by an active community.

              theHobbit unfortunately you just proved me you didn't read my posts. I didn't say I was AGAINST PT, I said I was AGAINST Simsense / their PT director. If he was shooting VR scenes, he would be despised like Alex Mack.
              Since you cannot read properly, no point to bother discussing this with you anymore. You are wasting my time.

                  vrguy69 Iā€™m not on Reddit so will make my feelings known elsewhere. Thanks for the link.

                    alkory I understood the passive aggressive nature of your post perfectly.

                    Maybe I will see you sometime saying, "realJamVR used to be great but since they started with the PT the golden era is gone. Hey, don't get me wrong, I love PT but maybe realjamVR should park PT blah blah" - passive aggressive nonsense. Please go look it up if you don't know what this type of behaviour is lol

                    Hairsational I mostly stopped replying to him for the same reason

                    awwww šŸ˜ƒ

                        fenderwq Auto-translated JAV? Any tips how best to do this? Absolutely agree that the intimacy in JAV is incredible as it is, and could only get better when able to understand the dialogue.

                            avengerbob It's not plug and play and will require some programming. I've used both Google translate services and the large whisper model of open AI. Had some issues whit the latter but that might not be the case for you. I think google gives the best results at the moment.

                            So if you have some programming skills my advice would be to find a good auto transcribe repro and start from there. Personally, I wrote a library management tool that auto transcribes and detects JAV but off course you could also just transcribe everything in a folder or something.

                              Hairsational

                              ...passthrough itself is a function of a virtual reality headset, and it allows the simulation of actual elements with virtual ones. Passthrough uses cameras to determine what your bedroom looks like, so in essence it is still a 100% virtual image of your bedroom, based on enough real time data to fool the old braincell.

                              As such, i would argue passthrough is very much an aspect of VR.

                              It's a bastardized, cack-handed way of trying to approximate augmented reality by using an entirely virtual one, but one that plays convincingly to the current technology...

                                  vrguy69 could be, but they seem to make appearances on other sites. There are lots of popular in demand performers

                                    InfiniteFun That argument can be made but it's not a convincing one. Whether the photons are coming from an electronic display or from the real objects around you makes no practical difference when the intended effect or goal is the same.