petermc
Yeah for sure the VR requirements for hardware and filming technique is much higher than 2D so not for everyone. Imo it's only worth filming VR if it's done to a high standard - otherwise it's better to stick with 2D videos.
I think SLR use ZCamK2 Pro camera which is $6k new so imo it's not super super out of reach for small studios, finance/loan should be possible right?
I've seen a bunch of smaller studios that would have had amazing content if it were in better quality, for example..
https://www.sexlikereal.com/studios/blush-erotica
https://www.sexlikereal.com/studios/peeping-thom
I can see both sides of the aggregator argument tbh, SLR being an aggregator can feel like it's stifling competition but on the other hand, it allows small studios to grow as they don't need to invest in their own website/billing system etc. They simply upload the videos and SLR take care of everything else.
Customers only have so much money to spend each month on porn, so it's unrealistic to expect people to sub to many sites.
Studios delaying SLR uploads is one tactic to try and encourage people subbing to their own website and kind of smart.
At the end of the day i'd say it's definitely a win for customers and small studios that aggregator websites exist so long as they offer fair and transparent payouts to studios.
Also, if a studio has their own website then they are not bound by certain content rules (incest for example) that SLR must abide by due to payment processor rules, we all know how popular incest is in porn, that's a giant niche that seems untapped in VR.