I guarantee you'll have problems with the credit card companies for this. There are people on here (not me, but certainly people) who will write in to epoch and cause issues, or they will log-in to online banking and place a cancellation request (which the companies will be forced to honour b/c reps of SLR have said 30 downloads per 72 hours on the forums etc). Requests like that are what credit card companies HATE; in fact, it's why they have agreed to block porn. They don't want to return money or to use their resources disputing with customers the consequences of changed policy from a contract / agreement.
The problem with 144h is that users need to be able to keep track of when the clock starts and stops, and that presents issues and complications. It also is a concern for folks addicted to porn. They download everything immediately and then grow angry waiting for days.
Yeah, I don't think I've reached anywhere close to the 30 recently... 144h is such a long time, though, that you should have a counter for when the clock refreshes, and that may be hard to add at short notice...
The change should have been rolled out with monthly resubscription ...That's how the big companies like Google have succeeded, by changing the terms gradually and forcing users to accept new terms, not changing stuff without a pretext of consent.
For example, when I joined Facebook back in 2004 the policy said that they would NEVER sell my information or include advertisements. Zuck even gave his word to all users that it would never be done. So when they inevitably needed to sell user data to keep afloat they just posted a message to everyone saying, 'hey, we're gonna make these changes and if you don't like them you have X days to delete your acct and be gone.' Folks were forced to comply.
Also, if you are having bandwidth problems, I don't think most folks would complain if the highest download size was closer to 30 or 40 GB instead of 150. I'd love to know the stats on how many ppl actually download the 100+ GB files.
Again, no issues with the changed limit, just with the unexpected rollout and timeframe of 144h. Why not just keep 72 or set the limit at 150 per 30 day period?