SLR Originals is getting back to 8K Canon production

petermc

LordCrash not true at all. If that was the case, I’d never have joined SLR in the first place as they have virtually none. It’s something I’d like to see more of sure, just as there’s things I know you’d like to see more of. I’m curious though why you consider all those other sites boring and SLRO not? It’s all the same vanilla type content, it’s just they all make consistently decent looking scenes.

LordCrash

petermc I’m curious though why you consider all those other sites boring and SLRO not?

SLRO at least do scene with multiple girls regularly and with their often lengthy shoots they really cover some amazing content on film with lots of intimacy well done build up. Nothing feels rushed or cookie cutter imho. Just take the latest scene with Octavia, it has like 10 or 15 minutes blowjob action but slow and intimate, takes it time. It doesn't feel like somebody put that segment in in order to fulfil a checklist. SLRO often feels like a carefully staged and well executed production that just does the right things at the right time while most other sites do porn by numbers most of the times. CzechVR is imho the only other site that manages to stage intimate and highly arousing VR porn on a regular basis with everyone involved bringing their absolute A game. You know, there are a lot of scenes with decent angles and beautiful girls but way too often that's about it. Decent but also pretty boring.

petermc

LordCrash fair enough. I can agree with a lot of that. I just don’t think they’re very good technically at filming it.

They’ve always had issues for me with scaling, and with the camera being too close even before the current farcical situation where they raced ahead and filmed a ton of scenes with a camera they didn’t know how to use. Also don’t get me started on their consistent failure to include doggy style and how bad it looks when they bother to try.

I like the lengthier scenes, multiple girls and intimacy of SLRO, I just wish it was married with a better crew/director to do it justice.

Vrsumo2017

The FM DUO looks good with 8k

Any studios using this cam, it's looks like a camera I've seen in bts videos from another studio, can't remember what studio.

spacepirate

Vrsumo2017 apparently not suitable for shooting porn

Vrsumo2017

I found this video on YouTube this guy showing off a Canon 8k, comparing visuals...

Out the box in default mode the cam looks good

Then shows the camera in a setting called c-log 3 cinema gamut, and that looks like the filter I hate to see in vrp, looks movie-ish, like the contrast is to low and colors don't pop. Can't stand that filter...

But anyways, I was thinking if it's the same canon yall using rest it to default mode. Just a thought

Also he's got this video, he goes into great details about the settings

https://youtu.be/67PCpqvgpXU

Was interesting to watch, even tho I'm not a director or anything...

But the default setting I think would look good 👍
Can't stand that c-log 3 cinema gamut, it looked like thats what yall used on that Mean Girls scene, and that's how NA scenes would look like too. Low contrast with colors not popping out.

What yall did here in this scene with the picture setting/filter was perfect
The Geeks are Cumming - Fucking Sexy Classmate Leana Lovings Ultra HD VR
It's very crisp and colors popped out. 👌

Anyways, just sum theories I had.

bacula8630

Vrsumo2017 I found this video on YouTube this guy showing off a Canon 8k, comparing visuals...

Out the box in default mode the cam looks good

Then shows the camera in a setting called c-log 3 cinema gamut, and that looks like the filter I hate to see in vrp, looks movie-ish, like the contrast is to low and colors don't pop. Can't stand that filter...

C-log is not a filter. It’s a setting used in filming that allows you to capture more dynamic range. Most beneficial in tricky lighting conditions where there’s lots of shadows and bright highlights in the same shot.

It isn’t meant to be used straight from the camera . Like you said, it looks very flat and dull. You need to do color grading in post to bring back the contrast and color saturation before exporting the final product.

C-log by itself probably isn’t responsible for the look of some of the videos you don’t like. It’s just a tool videographers use when filming.

ibins

Vrsumo2017 But anyways, I was thinking if it's the same canon yall using rest it to default mode. Just a thought

No offense, but I do not think professionals need tips from someone watching a random youtube video and clearly has no idea about photography/videography.

Vrsumo2017 Then shows the camera in a setting called c-log 3 cinema gamut, and that looks like the filter I hate to see in vrp, looks movie-ish, like the contrast is to low and colors don't pop. Can't stand that filter...

Which is blatantly obvious not even knowing what C-Log is.

Actually C-Log is way closer to what the camera sees in reality, and the standard mode is kinda what you call a filter to boost contrast/saturation.

C-Log kinda is a substitute for RAW for videos, as most cameras even today can not handle true RAW when shooting videos, unlike what you do in photos. It is not meant to use C-Log for final videos, but as an input for the postprocessing pipeline to preserve as much information as possible from the actual scene without having actual RAW.

The "standard" mode that you love so much looses a lot of DR and possibly also color accuracy while giving you this "pleasing to the eye" view.

And frankly all VR videos of today show terrible DR when they shoot even a somewhat demanding scene with some outdoor content visible, and only very controlled lighting in studios can give DR in check that it looks good.

So if they are not shooting C-Log (or something similar) it would be very welcome to do so and get a proper tonemapping in post. Maybe they are and current cameras are simply not capable of shooting such high DR, although hard to believe when I see what even my tiny RX100 can do when shooting LOG.

Vrsumo2017

g2kbuffetboy but I believe a lot of people are having issues with the 190 fisheye and not necessarily the rig itself

As vr porn viwers do really need fish eye?
I mean what does fish eye really do?
If we're looking straight most the time do we need an extra if not that much more then 180 view on the sides, so many vr studios shoot with no fisheye and never have I seen a demand or request for them to shot fisheye. So is fisheye that important or in demand for vr porn? 🤷‍♂️

Naught America use to shoot fish eye and they stopped long time ago. When I first started watching vrp I always wondered why they had cone heads, I was like this can't be right maybe they messed it up, wasn't till later I learned about fisheye here on slr.

Vrsumo2017

ibins The "standard" mode that you love so much looses a lot of DR and possibly also color accuracy while giving you this "pleasing to the eye" view.

If your talking about standard like in this scene

The Geeks are Cumming - Fucking Sexy Classmate Leana Lovings Ultra HD VR

If that's standard then give more of that! wasn't nothing wrong with it imo, picture looked very crisp, colors were great, scale was great/perfect. It's perfect! if there was any lose of anything due to it being standard then it was very unnoticeable, and that's the best I've seen Leana in vr out of all her vr scenes. 👍

Vrsumo2017

ibins clearly has no idea about photography/videography.

I don't 🤷‍♂️ , but what is DR?

LordCrash

Vrsumo2017
Dynamic range

rerun119

Is this still the company plan?

justanotherone

It would be nice to eventually get back to the 8k video. I was recently looking at some of the previous 6K videos on the zcam k2 which has more lifelike sizing but the visual quality was definitely not as good as the recent 8K which has much better visuals IMO but larger scaling. Using Pimax 8k x with 3080 ti on heresphere. Trade offs here I can see the pros and cons of each one. Too bad not everyone can be satisfied.

innol

justanotherone Meta quest2 still occupy the market which is not that good to watch 8k .Not everyone can afford the high price of pimax8k and a highend computer...

metichemsi

I used to own the K2 pro and upgraded to the Canon r5 c and they are completely different FOV lenses and the R5 C should not be left in fisheye view, I don't understand why you keep publishing videos in fisheye, you have to convert to equirectangular to get proper 180 FOV.

petermc

metichemsi other people using the Canon camera (VRHush and FuckpassVR) had the same scaling and distortion issues and they do not use the fisheye option.

metichemsi

petermc I'll look through some of their scenes to see if I can see it. Not sure what conversion software or process those sites use but I'll try comparing scaling vs my own footage to see if I see a difference. Most likely have to do with the IPD difference between the two systems.

fathergll

petermc This is true but I have also seen some excellent work with the R5C with correct scaling, so it is possible to get it correct(though possible it's more limiting over 64 IPD cameras )

For example watch this scene from Fuckpass https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/that-happened-in-vegas-31111

« Previous Page Next Page »