SLR Originals is getting back to 8K Canon production

bacula8630

LordCrash Octavia looked perfectly fine in her latest 8k SLRO scene. It was imho pretty much one of the best scene I've seen in quite a while, finally Octavia in all her glory. I love that the girls seem to be a big "bitter" actually, that way you can fully enjoy their glorious bodies, especially such an exceptional one like Octavia's. Not sure what's so great about tiny models who hardly fill 10% of the screen before me on a "traditional" old-school cam. You call that "realistic"? Fuck realism. This is better than reality. I almost instantly came when I saw Octavia in cowgirl in this scene, so insanely hot and sexy. It's imho easily her best scene yet by a far margin, due to her performance, due to the amazing direction, due to the intimacy and due to the camera word AND the tech. The time Octavia spent on "full screen" detailed cock sucking, egg sucking and dick licking was simply breathtaking. I can't imagine a better angle or "size" for that stuff, it's simply perfect that way. It's such a shame that we now go back to the old, out-dated and comparably worse setup. There was no focus issue in this scene with Octavia at all imho and video clarity was phenomenal. It was imho simply perfect.

So please, for the love of God, before you scrap the new cam and cave in to the "old school" guys on their oudated headsets, please shoot at least one last scene with Melody Marks on the new cam, just like the one with Octavia. Let's just call it "Making it up to you, part 2".

So, you admit the scale is larger than life.

You enjoy the scale being larger than real life? Great. That’s perfectly fine. I have no problem with that. But please don’t insist that others that don’t like it are wrong. And somehow living in the past with their antiquated headsets.

I think most people want the scale to be true to life. Unfortunately, the Canon rig doesn’t provide that. At least for my IPD. And I use the same headset as you.

As far as Octavia’s scene. The scale wasn’t too bad during the first part of the scene. When she was at farther distances, she looked slightly too large. But it wasn’t extreme. But on the bed. When the action was close up…GigantorVision. Which was probably your favorite part! 😀

Anyways, I’m not trying to pick a fight with you. If you like the larger than life scale. More power to you. But I think there are enough people that don’t like it, that SLR can’t continue using the Canon rig at this time.

LordCrash

bacula8630 So, you admit the scale is larger than life.

I don't know. I watch porn through some VR googles which is something entirely different than life. It's just a cool gimmick for porn. I also have to admit that Octavia never sat right in front of me and I never fucked her so I think I have to leave that question open.

bacula8630 But please don’t insist that others that don’t like it are wrong.

Sorry, dude, but I will continue to see it that way. I guess you'll have to live with it.

bacula8630 I think most people want the scale to be true to life.

I think you're not in the right place to claim what the majority of people want. Or did you do extensive scientific research on the topic? I really love it when people try to lecture me that I shouldn't do this or that but making up complete bullshit up on their own. You don't want me to judge on you? Maybe don't like like you're speaking for somebody else than yourself... 😉

bacula8630 Anyways, I’m not trying to pick a fight with you.

LOL. If you don't want to pick a fight then don't write things that imply exactly this... 🤣

bacula8630 More power to you.

Pretty easy statement for you to make - well knowing that the new cam won't be used anymore. So how is that more power to me? It's actually no power to me. You guys got your will and we're back to the same stuff everybody else does, not enhanced, just boring reality. Sigh.

gurphh

LordCrash I love that the girls seem to be a big "bitter" actually, that way you can fully enjoy their glorious bodies, especially such an exceptional one like Octavia's. Not sure what's so great about tiny models who hardly fill 10% of the screen before me on a "traditional" old-school cam.

You do realize that's just a matter of taste, right? I'm (sadly) almost only attracted to girls of the more slender type. Tall or short doesn't matter that much. But I still wouldn't want them to look more slim than they really are.

Also, you got the above wrong. The girls take up the same percentages of the screen on both cameras. The difference is that on the Canon, the girls appear to be further away than they really are, which makes the brain think they are bigger.

LordCrash

gurphh Also, you got the above wrong. The girls take up the same percentages of the screen on both cameras. The difference is that on the Canon, the girls appear to be further away than they really are, which makes the brain think they are bigger.

Not really...

rerun119

LordCrash My headset is better than yours. Pimax 8kx. So maybe your headset is the problem and you just can't tell how big the girls look.

LordCrash

raider968 legitimate complaints

Every complaint is legimitate in the eyes of the one making it, dude. 😉

LordCrash

raider968 The last month has been a complete waste with 80 per cent of the scenes being unwatchable either due to poor scaling or poor focus.

For you, my dude, for you. I don't agree at all with that statement. But my brain is also not so limited to really narrow parameters in order to be able to enjoy porn.

petermc

LordCrash you and I agree on a lot of things but I would have to agree with others that scaling is important. I may be using a cheap (relatively speaking!) headset in the Quest 2 but it is also by far the market leader and the one most people use. If the scenes don’t work right in the headset pretty much everyone uses, that’s a problem.

You have conceded that, even on your headset, the scaling is off, maybe not as pronounced as some people are experiencing but girls appear a little larger than life but that this is not a problem for you as the VR headset is just a different way of watching porn. I’m only speaking for myself here (but I suspect others will concur) but the whole attraction of VR porn to me is that it allows me to trick my brain into thinking I’m in the room, with these girls. Not completely obviously but far more so than just watching a standard POV scene. Seeing a girl looking giant sized totally kills that for me and actually makes VR less immersive than 2d porn as I can’t get past it and lose myself in the scene. Not all these 8k scenes are way out on my headset, some are only very slightly out but, if I ever rejoin, I don’t want to deal with it when the likes of Wankzvr, POVR, VRBangers, Badoinkvr network, Czechvr etc. don’t have these issues on the whole.

Ricster89

petermc i agree with you, i need the scaling to be correct in order to fully enjoy vr porn, but i respect those who dont need that requirement to be met too

LordCrash

petermc I don’t want to deal with it when the likes of Wankzvr, POVR, VRBangers, Badoinkvr network, Czechvr etc. don’t have these issues on the whole.

Well, their content is most often just fucking boring (CzechVR excluded). I rather support studios with great content and the best possible video quality, even when the girls are a bit bigger than you're used to (which again isn't a bad thing at all in my books, quite the contrary) than studios with boring content or simply bad video quality.

And about the headst: I think it's a combination of headset and video player actually. HeresphereVR is simply much better than DeoVR and offers a much better viewing experience, especially for scenes that seem to have some technical issues.

petermc

Ricster89 Absolutely, I respect that it might not be an important issue to some and I wish I was more like them! It’s an absolute dealbreaker for me though. If a studio cannot get it right, I will not support their content.

ibins

Yesterday I tried reducing the IPD on my headset, actually to narrow for my real eyes, surprisingly I did not have any problems getting cross eyed, and the scale was much better maybe give it a try.

It seems for videos it is actually better for the headsets IPD to match the cameras IPD, than your head.
Combined with a slight reduction of the zoom slider, size actually felt perfect.

gurphh

ibins Yesterday I tried reducing the IPD on my headset, actually to narrow for my real eyes, surprisingly I did not have any problems getting cross eyed, and the scale was much better maybe give it a try.

That's odd. I don't notice a change in scale at all when I do that. I only get some chromatic abberation and ghosting when the slider doesn't match my eyes. That's mainly visible when I look at high contrast stuff, like text, though.
It would be interesting to hear from more people how they experience this.

argyle43

gurphh It would be interesting to hear from more people how they experience this.

I’ve never had any noticeable improvement playing with those IPD settings.

ibins

gurphh I only get some chromatic abberation and ghosting when the slider doesn't match my eyes.

This would make sense if your headsets lenses have a rather tiny sweet spot.
Text (from the UI) obviously looks worse with the wrong IPD, but the video strangely looks better.

petermc

I don’t find SLRO content any less boring tbh, they just look worse (imo).

LordCrash

petermc Of course. If it doesn't involve anal sex it's of not interest for you.

petermc

LordCrash not true at all. If that was the case, I’d never have joined SLR in the first place as they have virtually none. It’s something I’d like to see more of sure, just as there’s things I know you’d like to see more of. I’m curious though why you consider all those other sites boring and SLRO not? It’s all the same vanilla type content, it’s just they all make consistently decent looking scenes.

Vrsumo2017

Will yall let's us know when the new scenes with the zcam will be released?

Are yall filming now with the zcam?

Vrsumo2017

With out going threw all the slro videos, what all scenes were filmed with the cannon 8k?

parsec

ableman I think a lot of the difficulty is that the wide field of view makes it difficult to place lights anywhere but from behind the camera so the contrast always appears flat due to direct light from the front. Getting natural looking lighting from the sides or from practical sources I believe would help with contrast.

« Previous Page Next Page »