What exactly canon cam is this cuz most youtube videos doing reviews or uploading vr videos Its says 180° 8k dual fisheye lens but we uploading 200° for the new scenes?
And sum of these youtube videos look extra crisp.
What exactly canon cam is this cuz most youtube videos doing reviews or uploading vr videos Its says 180° 8k dual fisheye lens but we uploading 200° for the new scenes?
And sum of these youtube videos look extra crisp.
g2kbuffetboy you are right
This is a great decision. The recent SLR Originals which could have been epic were ruined by the scaling and focus, which was a big reason that was preventing me from pulling the trigger on a lifetime subscription. Listening to customer feedback and making hard but good decisions like this convinces me that it is OK to go ahead and invest in a lifetime subscription.
g2kbuffetboy I also have a Pimax 8KX and to me all the videos are blurry around the edges. Its not even the the edges but it gets blurrier the farther you look from the middle of what the camera taped. Since you can just look around more in the pimax i start to get motion sick. To me the last camera was the best Image quality I have ever seen plus the scenes they shot with it. I would say the last 6 months before they switched the camera that that was the best run of video making any VR company as had. That's why to me it pained me so much to just stop and then just start all over with new company's and lenses. Please go back to perfection.
I'm sad to hear this. I don't think the camera is the issue. other studios use the same camera but dont have the weird stretched feeling. If i would guess it's the 190 FOV or some other processing. BTW I have 60 IPD and it looks too big especially for me vertically too. So the problem is not the IPD of the camera.
Unfortunate, but the right decision. Your casting is out of this world at the moment but the Canon is letting you down. As others have suggested maybe it's possible to shoot some BTS content with the Canon and seek community feedback. Tweaking as you go...
g2kbuffetboy For me, the bump in visual picture quality is awesome in my Pimax 8KX. The new 8K videos are noticeably sharper and colors are better too. I really was excited when these new 8K canon videos started to rollout.
This. I'm so fed up with all the people with their low-budget headsets and cheap players who claim that there wasn't a bump in visual quality. Even in my mid-tier G2 with HeresphereVR it's so damn obvious and I can only imagine how good it must look in a Pimax.
doublevr The Canon videos from other producers don't look good either
That's not true at all imho.
rerun119 To me the last camera was the best Image quality I have ever seen plus the scenes they shot with it. I would say the last 6 months before they switched the camera that that was the best run of video making any VR company as had. That's why to me it pained me so much to just stop and then just start all over with new company's and lenses. Please go back to perfection.
Which companies do you mean? I guarantee you that at least CzechVR and WankzVR look better and more crisp than 6k SLR. Nothing perfect about the old rig.
LordCrash This. I'm so fed up with all the people with their low-budget headsets and cheap players who claim that there wasn't a bump in visual quality. Even in my mid-tier G2 with HeresphereVR it's so damn obvious and I can only imagine how good it must look in a Pimax.
I have a G2 too, and I agree that at least some of the Canon videos look better, qualitywise. It's the girls that look like giants that totally ruins it for me.
gurphh Giants? They look like slightly bigger than in most other scenes if you use the correct settings (Fisheye, 190°). But I guess things are either great or ruined these days, no middle ground to be found anywhere...
LordCrash I do use correct settings, and I've tried both DeoVR and HereSphere. I realize the scale thing isn't very important to some. But yes, for me, personally, videos where the girls are this big really are ruined for me. I'd never watch any of them. So wanting slightly lower quality visuals instead of that is a no-brainer for me. Personally.
gurphh I realize the scale thing isn't very important to some
Yeah but that
GFE: Octavia Treat - Busty Blonde Pornstar in Lingerie Virtual Girlfriend Experience SLR Original
It was looking good up till the upclose mish (wich was looking really good camera positions wise) and the laying cg, but boy the picture was looking hella big-ish kinda more then the mean girls...
I'd watch it but it wouldn't be something I'd download and keep. ...would of been a epic scene if it weren't for the big-ish looking scale.
But I will say
Big. Black. Tits. - HD VR Porn SLR Original starring Lily Starfire
And
All Hers - Beautiful Babe Vanessa Moon Hardcore HD VR Porn SLR Original
We're looking good scale wise if this was filmed with the new cannon 8k.
Vrsumo2017 We're looking good scale wise if this was filmed with the new cannon 8k.
Yes, they were.
SLR_SLR Originals_All Hers_4000p_27660_FISHEYE190.mp4
Vrsumo2017 Ofc they'll look good if girls are on a smaller side
Lily Starfire is 5 ft 0 in (1.52 m)
Vanessa is 5' 1" and 115 pounds.
Philip Lily Starfire is 5 ft 0 in (1.52 m)
Vanessa is 5' 1" and 115 pounds.
WHAT! no way, they looked taller but it didnt look to bad, but I rather them look their real height.
Hell for long time I thought Dee Williams was on the tall side, wasn't till recently I had to look her height up cuz she looked short in her new naughty america vr scene, turns out she 5'4
But wow if Lilly 5' 0, hell! we need a do over with her, she's a hottie! A Lil shawty hottie too!
5'1? Would have never known based on the video alone. Yea, scale is definitely off.