SLR Streaming vs Downloads data

petermc exactly a point I tried to make above

argyle43 I think it’s safe to conclude that the steeper slope on the streaming graph just means your content is getting a lot better, and it is.

Increased quantity multiplied by longer time streaming views would support that conclusion, whereas downloads would continue to increase on a more constant and less steep slope; exactly what is depicted.

But I disagree the chart tells us that “streaming is greater than downloads”, unless we can see data around how often files are opened and how long they are watched once downloaded. The conclusions around that are just guessed at above.

I only stream to check the scene (minute or two), if i like it i download and then watch, but since i check a lot of scenes and download a lot less (maybe 1 in 20 of those checked), i guess i contribute more to streaming, even though i strongly prefer downloads.

Streaming is totally fine, but I'd request to @doublevr that the Deo WebVR be activated in 4K. I'm fairly new to VR and have a very poor system. It would be fantastic if you enabled the 4K streaming option as an alternative for low-end users, like myself, interested in the JAV. As I understand it, downloading the JAV is out of the question because of your contract restrictions. But downloading streams of it should be fine, or at least it is for my friends who subscribe to the source R18. Right now it's only possible to use the SLR implementation of Deo WebVR for 1980 x 1980, whereas the Deo site has an implementation of the web format that allows for true 4K and even higher. Lots of foreign users with slow connections and bad rigs, like me, would benefit from the minor improvements in image quality. Amazing site, though, with fast servers and great content!

EDIT: Maybe I'm getting it wrong, because I recall reading on here that it is possible to stream at 4K in the web interface; but the implementation of Deo WebVR on this site shows no option for 2160p, which is the most common standard of '4K'.

doublevr Only 8% of users re-watch at least 60 sec of the same video in 2 month

I’ve taken my horse out of the race on this one as I went lifetime 2 1/2 years ago, but if this slow movement towards streaming only that you keep setting up with these posts (and comments in all the other posts) continues, you’re going to lose a lot of subscription renewals.

And these cherry-picked statistics and meaningless graphs say nothing. There’s a perception thing you’re not taking into account here. Take away people’s choices little by little, and soon enough they’ll stop choosing you.

Please stop this.

arguing this however is pointless. I just reread this entire thread. let’s remind ourselves, the original post up top is a graph comparing minutes streamed on one axis to files downloaded on the other. Apples to Tennis Shoes. The graph that would actually say something is the one that compares time streamed to the time downloaded files get watched once downloaded…. minutes watched vs. minutes watched… not minutes vs. number downloaded. The meaningful comparison is obviously impossible, so instead this seeming and ever-evolving case to eliminate downloads at SLR is made via a steady drip of manufactured stats that could only convince people lacking the most basic understanding of math and data science.

clearly doublevr either hasn’t read the patient and reasoned arguments above, just doesn’t care, or more likely both.

Pulling this part of the thread back out too. That “bullshit” I was ordered to stop bringing…

the key language there is “any time soon”, and what just happened…

Probably better lock this thread too I guess

Anyway, this is the portion of thread above that matters the most:

gurphh So please don't go too far with this. I will leave if you do.

doublevr to be fair, I’m not one that notices right now either. By and large I stream your content. But I also download the files I know I’m going to come back to, which on this site is mostly Nash multigirl scenes. I’m a picky bastard.

All that said, I’m very sympathetic to those here upset to have their choices taken little by little and their voices not heard. Not everyone has the luxury of top level headsets or Gigabit service. The more people you can accommodate out there, the more robust SLR will be.

My observations with VR is that those of us that have made the commitments needed to view quality content are more than happy to pay for the privilege to do so, but it’s a two way street.

I appreciate your response, but I think you should listen to the growing dissatisfaction and back off from these heavy-handed policies.

doublevr your words dont mean much when you break your promises like that... just saying

No more threads like these. You either stream or you download.

People who stream: people with the money to fork out gigabyte internet or/and don't share the internet.

People who download: people who share the internet.

No more stream vs download thread cause there is no point of a thread: unless SLR makes an announcement, poor reviews from ex subscribers. SLR loses to other competition like vrcosplayx or virtualtaboo cause - those sites allow downloads

No more stream vs download threads.