• SLR

  • AV1 Is Now Live on SexLikeReal!

Manny_S Without those changes the model skin tone would be orange.

You might be working for the White House pretty soon 😃 I am well aware that everything is subjective and even my own perception and preferences are changing all the time. Maybe something in the middle between orange and pale white could work. On the pictures, the white doesn't look as bad as in the headset but would still prefer a little more tan. But that's just me.

      SchnuppiLilac didnt get the white house part 😃
      but i do agree about subjective, mine is subjective as well, so i guess something like a poll would be good to make to figure out what people think

        in a meanwhile to support my main concert about details i made a little better shot where quality difference is more visible
        left - processed
        right - raw
        which one do you guys think is better in term of details?

          Manny_S I don't watch PT anymore because I am back to a Pimax but I did try this scene for a couple of minutes to see what it looked like.
          One of the problems I had with all PT scenes that are made for it is that the girl is always too brightly light for what my room looked like.
          Even if I try to turn down the colors on DEO and turn on more lights it still was never enough.
          Can you make the girls not so bright in post production? I feel like that would help for a lot of the people.

            Also, people comparing static images for the HBR debate is kinda pointless. A lot of the benefits of HBR is during motion. Comparing Clips and doing AB testing is really the way to go.

            petex67 devs are working on av1 ppv release. Will air them in coming weeks. All ppv users are going to get them

                doublevr

                If we have to pay $6.99 anyway then I would appreciate it if you can provide both AV1 and HEVC Master. Thanks!

                  boudaba Good question, would indeed be interesting to hear if @doublevr thinks that the quality of that video is what SLR quality should be like.

                    Here is a quick comparison of an image taken from the H265 and the one that Manny_S sent me. Note that we are not on the same timecode and I am impatiently waiting for him to send me the same image with the same timecode of his version. I'm not trying to criticize SLR but just to understand and see if this video has a problem and possibly have a better version...

                      Wow what a difference. Interesting to see that it was at least not shot incorrectly. Just seems extremely compressed.

                        Time code : 00:01:13
                        The image on the left is taken from the H265 version found on the site.

                        boudaba That's true, but the sharpnesss of the right image I've not seen in any part of the video that was on this site. It's just a super smeared out blurry mess like in that photo on the left.