Depending on what headset you use and whether you use passthrough - the colors of the model's skin might or might not match the projected passthrough surroundings.
Be it a quest 2 with grey PT image
Or quest 3 with color PT image
Or quest pro with its semi colored PT image
Or some other headset you use.
But as i was to decide and experiment with the colors (prior we hired a colorist) - this was the skin tone i was more or less happy with.
Without those changes the model skin tone would be orange.
Add here a green spill that comes from the green walls that might be altering her real skin color.
And add the camera color shift (i noticed all the shots have that orangy tint and not just passthrough)
Good news is that we now do have a dedicated person (colorist) who has a sharp eye for colors and will be taking care of the colors from now on.
It is still a work in progress and i constantly give my feedback to our colorist regarding colors but hopefully we soon will get to the point where you guys will be happy with the colors.
Will try to make some sort of samples soon for you to compare before and after skin tone adjustments.
AV1 Is Now Live on SexLikeReal!
Manny_S Without those changes the model skin tone would be orange.
You might be working for the White House pretty soon 
I am well aware that everything is subjective and even my own perception and preferences are changing all the time. Maybe something in the middle between orange and pale white could work. On the pictures, the white doesn't look as bad as in the headset but would still prefer a little more tan. But that's just me.
SchnuppiLilac didnt get the white house part
but i do agree about subjective, mine is subjective as well, so i guess something like a poll would be good to make to figure out what people think
in a meanwhile to support my main concert about details i made a little better shot where quality difference is more visible
left - processed
right - raw
which one do you guys think is better in term of details?
Manny_S I don't watch PT anymore because I am back to a Pimax but I did try this scene for a couple of minutes to see what it looked like.
One of the problems I had with all PT scenes that are made for it is that the girl is always too brightly light for what my room looked like.
Even if I try to turn down the colors on DEO and turn on more lights it still was never enough.
Can you make the girls not so bright in post production? I feel like that would help for a lot of the people.
Also, people comparing static images for the HBR debate is kinda pointless. A lot of the benefits of HBR is during motion. Comparing Clips and doing AB testing is really the way to go.
Yo @doublevr
People are saying that they can't access HBR downloads even after paying $6.99. What gives?
Are HBR downloads included or not in PPV?
Here is a quick comparison of an image taken from the H265 and the one that Manny_S sent me. Note that we are not on the same timecode and I am impatiently waiting for him to send me the same image with the same timecode of his version. I'm not trying to criticize SLR but just to understand and see if this video has a problem and possibly have a better version...
- Edited
Wow what a difference. Interesting to see that it was at least not shot incorrectly. Just seems extremely compressed.
Time code : 00:01:13
The image on the left is taken from the H265 version found on the site.
harigeharry This seems to be the case, but we need to align ourselves to the same time code to avoid issues with focus, zoom, and movement.
- Edited
boudaba That's true, but the sharpnesss of the right image I've not seen in any part of the video that was on this site. It's just a super smeared out blurry mess like in that photo on the left.
