doublevr I understand. I'm not going to get upset at a particular person, but I think SLR in general is at fault for misleading users into thinking that they claim specific features work on specific devices when they, in fact, do not. That things change over time and technology becomes deprecated does not excuse SLR from making false claims: And anybody reading the SLR posts and site would naturally believe that they support the Index for things like Passthrough AI and alpha-packing.
I do wonder if such features did, at some point, work in some fashion (I know the Index itself has a limited roomview overlay that sort of works for chroma-key passthrough) or if SLR didn't even bother to test things before claiming that devices are supported.
A simple admission of fault, a simple apology, would be nice. An offer to refund part of the fee would be even better: I would like to hold onto my membership in case I at some point upgrade my hardware, but I think I have a right to be a bit upset at SLR in general, no?