rerun119 Look at this video with comments from 5 years ago but it's in the brand new section

If like in this example a studio that has left SLR years ago decides to bring back their videos, that's okay for me. I think it's different from duplicating content and selling it as new.

      toslr
      Fix your completely broken trans section, put a link to it somewhere people can actually find, and get them back.

        rerun119
        Nuria Millan now runs own studio but we will ask her no to publish duplicating content
        In the second case its KinkVR and now they publish previously deactivated videos. It´s a little bit different in this case because KinkVR studio was assigned with another company before.
        As for the RealHot scene this is how they do their business unfortunately. You can hide the content from the studio and/or comment on their videos.

            rerun119

            Damn that's so annoying to see

            SLR should require every uploaded video to have a filmed/release date, so people can look and immediately see if it's an old scene or not - recently there was a studio releasing 'new' videos that were filmed 5+ years ago on a crappy VR camera, it looks like ass

            It wouldn't be a bad thing to also add metadata that shows the camera model used to record it, that way people can filter for high quality scenes and it'll also provide info for other studios on what cameras look good

            There's getting more and more recycled crap on this website every time I look, it's like digging through a bargain bin at a dollar store đŸ˜†

              SchnuppiLilac I'm fine with a company pulling their content and then deciding they want to be back on the site. What I think is messed up is that it reappears in the NEW section. This encourages companies to pull things down then put it back up. Rinse and repeat to the front page over and over. Just like RealHot does now.
              I understand that people see it and think "oh yea I like that video so I will watch it again" but they also like videos from other companies too but just don't get to see them again on the new page.
              So any company that doesn't use this loophole is losing money to companies that do use it. What will be the outcome of this? Any guesses? Every company that is trying to make money needs to start doing this. This is not good for us the customer.

              BTW VRP pulled down videos and them SLR asked if there were any videos people wanted brought back. Lot's of VRP videos were brought back BUT they didn't put them in the new section. Why the double standard?

                  Vikke I like it, they should add manually made scrips, since I m very lazy!

                    Vikke
                    Nruai Millan seems like she posted the actual original, better quality version though. older VirtualPapi version is 60fps, but her new version is higher bitrate even though it's 30FPS. Just going by the numbers

                      rerun119 the videos from VRP were already on our servers and they provided us with a list of videos we can re-activate. So we were aware and able to prepare.

                          Vikke I guess they will learn and take them off the server next time.

                            vrpicasso It was uploaded then reuploaded the other day because of this double upload it had 3'6k likes yesterday or maybe two days ago. Now it is gone again. Wait and see if it gets put back up again and we will know what is going on.