rerun119 Now that the scene's been (re-)released, it looks like the content is the same, but the video has been uprezzed from 6K to 8K.

      anordr The entire catalogue of Seductive VR seems to be upscaled old Real Hot VR scenes. 67 videos. Be that as it may, what I don't like is their tactics to take down the old scenes first before they release them again. People who don't want to lose their favorites and don't know about this probably waste their money on buying scenes that will come back a couple of weeks later.

        SchnuppiLilac

        JK, of course. But I was holding out hope that they'd stick around for one more day so I could grab another 30 downloads for the week. c'est la vie

            anordr This is getting out of control and it is only going to get worse until SLR puts a stop to it. I don't think they will unless other studios start to notice and get mad that they have to compete against this shady practice.

            Look at today's videos.
            https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/so-lifelike-pov-virtual-reality-cock-sucking-51982
            Is the exact same video as this
            https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/viva-espaa-49860
            Nothing different at all. It's the same in every way.

            Look at this video with comments from 5 years ago but it's in the brand new section
            https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/pretty-please-stepdaddy-8467
            It's just reuploaded to get more views

            This video was taken down and put back up
            https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/hot-strip-club-sex-asian-19yo-teen-stripper-loves-thick-10-cock-51547

            This was yesterday
            https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/tiny-hazel-challenges-a-huge-cock-51921?t=117
            It's the same but now a little longer

            These are only the ones I know of but I could be getting tricked on some other videos and not even know.

            This is going to get way worse very fast

                rerun119 Look at this video with comments from 5 years ago but it's in the brand new section

                If like in this example a studio that has left SLR years ago decides to bring back their videos, that's okay for me. I think it's different from duplicating content and selling it as new.

                    rerun119
                    Nuria Millan now runs own studio but we will ask her no to publish duplicating content
                    In the second case its KinkVR and now they publish previously deactivated videos. It´s a little bit different in this case because KinkVR studio was assigned with another company before.
                    As for the RealHot scene this is how they do their business unfortunately. You can hide the content from the studio and/or comment on their videos.

                        rerun119

                        Damn that's so annoying to see

                        SLR should require every uploaded video to have a filmed/release date, so people can look and immediately see if it's an old scene or not - recently there was a studio releasing 'new' videos that were filmed 5+ years ago on a crappy VR camera, it looks like ass

                        It wouldn't be a bad thing to also add metadata that shows the camera model used to record it, that way people can filter for high quality scenes and it'll also provide info for other studios on what cameras look good

                        There's getting more and more recycled crap on this website every time I look, it's like digging through a bargain bin at a dollar store 😆

                          SchnuppiLilac I'm fine with a company pulling their content and then deciding they want to be back on the site. What I think is messed up is that it reappears in the NEW section. This encourages companies to pull things down then put it back up. Rinse and repeat to the front page over and over. Just like RealHot does now.
                          I understand that people see it and think "oh yea I like that video so I will watch it again" but they also like videos from other companies too but just don't get to see them again on the new page.
                          So any company that doesn't use this loophole is losing money to companies that do use it. What will be the outcome of this? Any guesses? Every company that is trying to make money needs to start doing this. This is not good for us the customer.

                          BTW VRP pulled down videos and them SLR asked if there were any videos people wanted brought back. Lot's of VRP videos were brought back BUT they didn't put them in the new section. Why the double standard?

                              Vikke I like it, they should add manually made scrips, since I m very lazy!

                                Vikke
                                Nruai Millan seems like she posted the actual original, better quality version though. older VirtualPapi version is 60fps, but her new version is higher bitrate even though it's 30FPS. Just going by the numbers

                                  rerun119 the videos from VRP were already on our servers and they provided us with a list of videos we can re-activate. So we were aware and able to prepare.