• Scenarios

  • What can be learned from LA Production

Vrsumo2017 the "virtual girlfriend" concept

Setting the GF vibe 😃

Virtual Girlfriend: Hey love, can we talk about something that's been on my mind?

Virtual Girlfriend: It's about the dishes and chores around here. I've noticed they've been piling up lately, and, well, it's starting to feel a bit overwhelming.
…
Virtual Girlfriend: I appreciate you acknowledging that you've been slacking on that front and promising to get to it, but it's just starting to feel like a bit of a pattern. Remember our agreement to share the household responsibilities?
…
Virtual Girlfriend: It's not just about the dishes, it's about feeling like a team, you know? When we share the load, it makes everything feel lighter.
…
Virtual Girlfriend: Thank you, ThePornaVRse. I appreciate your understanding. Let's work together to keep our home a happy and harmonious place. Now get your damn clothes off, will you!<

    Vrsumo2017 Yeah i'd like it if they made a new scene with a similar premise, but use a more popular model. I think they never made another one because that one only got 2k likes which is pretty low for an SLRO, but i think the lack of star power and using a model with no hair wearing an iffy wig affected the view numbers just as much as the unusual premise.

        Vrsumo2017 Hehe it shows indeed how we're all different but that's no news. I ALWAYS skip through that stuff to the action part myself.

          HughMungus We for sure are all different.
          I never liked strip clubs because it feels so transactional to me. I want a girl to want me for me, not because I will give her money.
          The same goes for those scenes. If there is an interview then it kills the illusion of her wanting to do it because she wants me. She is now just making porn. Because that is how I feel then I am going to assume everybody feels like I do and that is why it doesn't get a lot of likes. I'm just being sarcastic but I do thing some people feel the same.

          @Vrsumo2017 have you watched any of the UpCloseVR scenes. They interview the girl before shooting the scene.
          They have some pretty big stars and seem to have all the angles and distances ok. They don't get huge numbers though.
          I like all of what you said about talking to us except I want them to talk to me like I am their boyfriend.

              The two scenes sucked, mostly because the camera was too far away, just like it often was during J's Wankz days. Often, but not always. That's the frustrating thing about VR, directors keep winging it, without any kind of precise methodology or thorough pre-production testing so you never know from one scene to the next whether they're going to completely fuck up the camera distance or absolutely nail it. Really, nothing special here at all. A bubble machine! Yeah ok. I'd rather have good lighting.

                rerun119 My comment was in regards to the "Breaking the 4th Wall" scene where the girl talks to you as the person wearing the headset instead of as the male talent. I think it was just shot in a normal house/bedroom

                  rerun119 their boyfriend.

                  So if she says are you my virtual boyfriend for today? Will that be OK.

                  If got I ask that in virtual reality

                  Are you my virtual bf today?
                  YES MAMI! take me...skips to laying cg rcg, grabs fleshlight 🔦 fap fap fap! Lol 😆

                    rerun119 LA Production shoots it LIKE REAL LIFE.

                    I KNEW IT.

                    I know it could be placebo (it might have happened before, but I just noticed it with LA Prod), but I knew something was going on while I watched the scenes. For the first time, I felt like everything lined up, and I even looked down at the male performer and thought, "yeah, it's me." I swear to God, I paused the latest video during the couch CG (when the guy is grabbing her by the waist) I lined up my arm and hand IRL, and then I tried to look with one eye through the space between the headset and my nose. I was blown away when I noticed that I matched the proportions and distance.

                    I'll rewatch all the videos tonight, knowing everything is fully and properly sized/aligned. Then, I'll state my final verdict, but they look GREAT so far.

                    Now, on to the not-so-positive stuff:

                    • It needs better lighting: some dark scenes CRUSH the mids and shadows, and everything looks too dark and weird. Either get better studio lighting or be careful with the dynamic range
                    • Go easy on compression: they all look compressed as hell. If you go to the Melody scene, to the first missionary action, and pause the video, you'll notice a lot of compression artifacts and color banding (especially on her belly and legs)

                        rerun119 It is more the angles/distance than position, tbh. VRSpy has my head coming out of my nipples in seated positions and constantly cuts the models head off because of it. Really? In 2024? Other studios figured out that this is a cardinal sin YEARS ago. Close-up mish is similar - for Nash's angles to be real, I'd have to be like 9 feet tall.

                            Wendigo VRSpy has my head coming out of my nipples in seated positions and constantly cuts the models head off because of it.

                            I think its because for sum reason he has the cam tilted downwards, I think aimed straight and try to get the cam back as possible so it's literally the guys head lol, would look better.

                            I know all them different angle positions especially like Czechvr would do during laying cg are very popular, but in pt you can really see how some angles and camera heights just don't work well in pt. Imo anyways, from what I've seen. 🤷‍♂️

                              vrpicasso The two scenes sucked, mostly because the camera was too far away,

                              Camera distances is such a weird thing to me because I often test the scenes with my Tantaly Big Asses and scenes where the distances are correct I see people complaining about it being 'too far away'. In other cases I see people praising the camera work and distances and then I test and the dick is in my navel when I get everything lined up.

                              So I'm at a loss at times. I just don't get it. I can't figure out why I an average height dude (6 feet) can think 'this is perfect' and then some people say 'I feel like I'm a giant' and stunt cock is at my knees'.

                              I've seen people say it's actually because they want to be close to the action and they don't care about 'realism' which is fine in the sense that whatever floats someone's boat isn't something I'll argue people 'out off'. Issue is that it's just not POV to me but something else.

                              Some times I think it's a height issue. We are not all the same height and that of course means our perception of 'too close' and 'too far away' differ but then I watch those stunt cock in navel scenes and I'm thinking that can't be it.

                              In any case I've found if I can't see the guy's nipples clearly then it's too close. It doesn't matter how far I bend my head my nipples and upper chest is always visible, so I expect to see them in a scenethat has 'correct distances'.

                                  OliverDK For me - and especially with Nash vids - it is all about the seated cowgirl. If I am staring at the models solar plexus and her head is consistently cut off, it's too close and too low. This is 95% of Nash's scenes. Zooming out doesn't help since the model still has her head cut off.

                                  I don't understand how he can spend so much time making sure the model awkardly waives her armpits and feet at us in every scene, but still can't seem to stop cutting the model's head off.

                                    I haven't had the chance to watch the LA Productions scenes, but I'm planning on getting to them soon. I agree with all the discussion about overly scripted scenes. Less is more in VR porn. In VR porn: We need the bare minimum amount of pretext. We need cozy, colorful sets with perfect lighting. Most of all, we need authentic performances.

                                    As Stormy Daniels testified in New York court recently, "The sex is real. The character names might be different, but the sex is very real. That's why it's pornography and not a B-movie." With VR, you have the chance for the performer(s) to be completely honest with their audience. In fact, I demand that the performers be honest with me.

                                    Where I live, weed is legal. We have edibles that are cheaper (and easier on the stomach) than Advil. Watching VR porn while high is next level immersion. If a performance is fake, it stands out, no matter how beautiful the model. If I were directing, and you gave me a fake performance, you'd be sent home immediately. Fortunately, even from the bigger VR studios, you can find authentic performances if you look for them; sometimes, it's only 5 minutes of a one hour video where the magic happened.

                                    So that's the job of the VR porn director. The director needs to set the scene in such a way that the performer is able to have authentic sex with the camera. The thing that's working against us is that mainstream porn has devolved into agents negotiating a performance by pricing out sex acts that we the audience are more familiar with as tags (or categories). Then, the director is obligated to check all those boxes, as is the performer. This does not produce authentic sex; and in VR the audience is less easily fooled.

                                    aliso9 Wait... no more shoots from LA Productions in the future? I mean they must have a talented crew there and its not just the director. That would suck if they cease to operate. I thought their first 2 videos have been very impressive.

                                    You know when you hear from comedians that they can't provide good content because of all the mob-member political bullshit? Same dynamic here. The very same viewers complaining that there isn't enough content, are the very same viewers who break their neck to involve themselves in drama, which puts pressure on the entire market to tread very softly. A reasonable, objective, rational person, who actually sincerely believed in the competency of females (as opposed to those who use it as a political football/virtue signal but secretly don't believe in the competency of females) might come to the conclusion that females who hear not only the rumors we hear, but way more (from being on the inside), could make their own decisions on whom they want to work with and not. It's a pretty simple calculus - let the free market operate and decide. But the useful idiots of today are too immersed in their Mass Formation Psychosis, and that is, despite the bs that is spouted, what really has a control of things - unless enough rational people fight back.

                                        thatoculusdude We the people again are all different.
                                        Lighting isn't a huge thing for me. I don't know if there is a different way to shoot a scene with low looking light and not look weird to some people. I liked the lighting because I feel like a lot of the scenes that are in a bedroom are lite up crazy bright. I would think most people don't have sex with every light on. It can feel more natural to me

                                          Wendigo I think one of the problems with the camera looking different to different people is where we focus are attention when watching. If you watch a standing blowjob before the girl gets on her knees. She can look too tall but once she gets down then the distance can look correct. If you look at where your eyes are looking straight ahead and then look straight down. There is a few inches difference. I think Nash points the camera more at the dick so if you look up then it is too low.
                                          Also I think how we are sitting while we watch makes a difference. If I watch doggy where the stunt cock is standing at the end of the bed and im sitting up. It can feel like it is too far away but if I actually stand up then all of a sudden it can feel like the right distance.
                                          On top of all this I am 5'7" so that is a 5" difference to 6' tall.

                                            I just watched the latest Nash scene Not Over It.
                                            It was technically good. But I was bored. It really is the same thing different day.
                                            Why doesn't he start the scene outside? There is a beautiful pool I can see out the window. She can be suprised to see me outside. She could flirt and grab my cock outside before she says we need to sneak inside. Something different.

                                            After I got bored with the newest SLR Nash scene I turned on the latest VRSpy video Not For Sale to see what it looked like. Everything is the exact same except it is a different girl. It starts the same on a couch then on to the same positions in the bedroom. But you guys already know the order of the scenes.

                                            Also in the Not Over Yet scene I wanted her to keep the mini skirt on at first. LA Production did a great job of keeping some hot ass clothes on at first. We don't need the girls naked the whole time. They are already naked 99% of the time in every scene on here.