Upcoming price and download limit change

SchnuppiLilac There is no misuse

I like this part of your response.

SchnuppiLilac to pay out the rebate in the second month

I'd probably stop subscribing to SLR if they did this. I'd recommend a price of $19.00, ignoring this one-month only / subscription tier, just with a reduced download limit of half of the regular content and more downloads of SLR Originals productions. That would make the most sense, since SLR doesn't have to pay royalties on their own productions and bandwidth costs would be under the subscription fee. I'd also recommend that they enhance the reliability of their servers, since more than 50% of downloads are corrupted and need to be re-downloaded. Their competition, POVR, is more reliable in this respect, and they can offer unlimited downloads since they know how to limit users to one download at a time.

SchnuppiLilac

I use a download manager. Unfortunately Internet Download Manager (IDM) requires a separate subscription, and it's the only download manager that is effective with SLR-converted content. With IDM there are fragmentation artifacts every two to three minutes, instead of large portions of missing content (Free Download Manager) or frozen downloads that cannot be restarted (Xtreme download manager).

IDM allows users to download multiple files at once and potentially download the maximum from SLR without much hassle. POVR has a system that doesn't disconnect users based on time (you see the time-based, IP cookies SLR adds to their download links), rather they monitor users based on connection attempts and intensity (users cannot download multiple files at obce, so they can offer unlimited downloads).

@doublevr

You may want to reduce the download limit, but what you really need is a reduction in speed for heavy downloaders. With a slow connection of 2 MPS it woud be difficult for anyone to reach the SLR download limit. Many users have connection speeds of 20 MPS. One solution might be to limit download speeds after a certain number of downloads have been reached. If the user can afford to have a 20 MPS connection, they can pay extra for additional downloads.

Hairsational editors taking artistic liberties

No, the films are broken. It's a problem with the algorithm.

https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/doll-hole-masturbates-herself-in-vr-today-37124

Left = Blurred
Right = Sharpened

There have been many issues with SLR's algorithms. Videos from DeepInSex became inaccessible. There are ghost entries for content from 3D Pickup, https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/sis-best-friend-bored-horny-39123 .

doublevr

In some videos the left lens looks blurred, and in others it's the right lens. The effect of blurring from a VR180 camera looks diffrerent from what you're seeing here, in that typically the blur effect is limited to one part of the lens. Additionally, the blur effect on the one side is not counterbalanced by a sharpening effect on the other side, as seen in the Baberotica films.

Here's where due to blurring a film really needs to be re-shot. Here we have superb lighting, direction, and acting all ruined by a blurred lens.
https://www.sexlikereal.com/scenes/the-shop-25216

doublevr

Back to my point, though, a lower priced tier makes sense, especially one at the same price as POVR, provided that SLR can process payments in the same way to accept giftcards. Times have been made intentionally challenging for large groups of people. A $10.00 tier for either streaming only or 30 downloads over the course of a month would be appealing. You could make it one video a day and there would be many days where the subscriber will be too busy to download anything, so that subscription plan would be financially feasible.

Nevertheless, the current plans make sense even if individuals don't subscribe every month. I can only offer the perspective of someone who has returned to SLR for several subscriptions. There are months where I download very little, and other ones, like this one directly coinciding with my purchase of a Quest 3, that I download more than usual. The profit will likely balance out in the end.

As feedback, I prefer SLR over POVR since the site is less sleazy and allows for downloads of the 'original' files. However, SLR's casting as of late has been very poor, or at least not according to my tastes. The women you cast don't have to be young or anorexically thin, but their tattoos, if any, should be tasteful, and the plastic surgery, if any, also tasteful.