• Content

  • AI Scripts updates and requests

Whats going on with the AI versions?
Today: v0.1.0
1 week ago: v1.0.0

regression. wrong versions, or in fact generated with older models?

Kieshi Thank you, it's pretty annoying - I go to "scripts" category - filter by "new", and I get no new scripts. Loads of "old" scenes that have already been scripted by a human, appearing as "new". Wtf?

    Kieshi

    i noticed today that any video from ScriptAI that is labeled v2.0 shows the AI blue icon but when streaming the video on my quest 2 deovr app, but it has no movement for the script. Also it contains no heat map. Any labeled ScriptAI v1.0.1 work just fine.

    tl;dr
    scriptAI v2.0 not working
    scriptAI v1.0.1 working fine

        muRseNary Same here, wanted to try some newer scripts yesterday but they were not loading.

          Andrew_SLR @Kieshi @doublevr
          pulsaralto

          Hi, wanted to pick this point up again. It seems like older scenes are also getting a newer AI script, which is awesome! I'm just a little frustrated since the scripts I downloaded in august are now "outdated". I mean, I still like them, but if the new AI model is improved I'd also like that improved script too.
          Right now I'd have to use my 10 AI downloads on the same 10 scenes again if I would like that improved version. Would it be possible to change the behaviour of script downloads for AI scripts? Since I'm guessing the model will improve further with time. Of course I can always use DeoVR and stream the latest scripts. I just want a backup for my favorites in case the scene might be removed from SLR.
          So my request would be something like, change the 10 AI downloads to 10 AI 'unlocks' each month. Something like buying them? So the download can be permanently unlocked? Would that be possible?

                doublevr Yes I know. But I was hoping that for AI scripts it would be possible to change it so that the 10 downloads per month could be considered as "bought". Just because the AI model seems to get improved step by step.

                    doublevr that is a really bizarre response. This is basically saying "as we patch the software to remove our own bugs, we are not going to give you free access to the new patches". That's just downright bad development practices.

                    It would be a lot easier to admit that the requested feature would be very difficult for your team to implement. After all, it took them about 2 weeks to fix a simple 'sort by new' feature for your AI scripts and the sort was basically broken in the meantime while your users found ways to manipulate the address URL as a workaround.

                    Directly insulting a customer for a simple ask isn't going to serve this community well at all

                      Teamhello trans videos are off our lists for the moment, as AI is not doing the best with these scenes. We will let you know when this is possible 👌

                        doublevr Except script downloads aren't free. They are part of the Premium + Scripts subscription. It is not unreasonable to ask for the ability to get upgrades, as you would if you paid for the scripts individually.

                          doublevr

                          When I download a PS5 game and the developer updates it for BUG FIXES/PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS, those updates are automatically added to my device without any questions asked. The same goes for applications I've purchased on my phone. So, why should this be any different? An update is an update. I typically don't comment on matters like this, but if this policy is indeed in place, then it seems to be geared towards EXTRACTING maximum value from the consumer, without offering any additional benefits in return.

                          Suggesting, "This is how it works, just go pay more money," not only INVALIDATES the concern, but it also raises the issue that the additional funds wouldn't necessarily go to the original script creators. While it would still be disappointing, it would be more palatable if we knew that the creators were being compensated. Keep in mind, it costs SLR NOTHING to fix this issue.

                          Most inappropriate of all is the suggestion of, "Let's vote for some stupid populist government and get things for free." This would be an unsuitable and disrespectful response to a customer who is utilizing exclusively FREE services. This applies even more so to someone who is subscribed (and thereby paying) for the service and is seeking fair clarification and a potential compromise regarding membership benefits, which may have arisen due to (mistaken and unforeseen) oversights in SLR policy.

                          This is not the way to handle customers, or to communicate with people in general.