Lol the way anti pt users feel about pt porn I feel about some of these pt games I've seen in pt
Like pool and table tennis like why would I wanna be in my living room instead of a pool bar or table tennis arena.

Yall know whats odd and funny at the same time, if you search quest 3 and search by date on YouTube almost every reviewer you see are like men, they like in they're 30s with beards, lol like wth, I just thank that's strange, you'd think there be teens or early 20s reviewing it, is vr aimed at 30 year Olds and up? Lol 😆 🤷‍♂️...idk just thought that was strange.
One guy look late 40s maybe 50 lol

Someone should make a video "how good is quest 3 for porn and pass through porn" pg for youtube and deo, rated x here on slr. Lol

I'm surprised slr labs haven't done this yet, show off that alpha pron son!

not a lot of time with it...some 2D sites like CB and cool lil JAV site are very good. interface with cb is better on resolution, but the interface of getting in and out of full screen is dumb...which you do to tip and chat, but it leaves the open window way off center, which needs immediate correcting each time. JAV site is great and no issues

hoping for controller control updates from this place

have apps like bigscreen...the sample/previews of 3d movie look very cool...which you can rent. kinda MAKES sense to watch REG 3d movies with a 700-dollar headset...it was probably possible on the other headsets also...while i have had bigscreen, i never used it from before.

Vrsumo2017

sorry...i REMEMBER getting to SEE the green check the very first day looking at all this...before bringing it up...mighta got too excited, as i can't seem to get the green check to appear again over the last two days or times in SLR

luckily been busy seeing other things...NEW(to me) JAV site (no ESG....so all the crazy shit we're used to)...with little section of non-pixilated clips on the page. in three D...i would be going frigging blind, but only that looks great with q3

      spanker so when you want to change the the function for the control buttons or joystick

      Example the zoming in and out you wanted it to move up and down instead "pitch"

      What you do is you click on pitch and push up on the joystick then you should see the green check, then click on the green check to save it.

      You can do this for all the controls

      You click on one, then click on a button you want to change it to then you'll see the green check.

          Vrsumo2017 Standing doggy is always too high up and far away IMO. 90% of the pixels are devoted to the background and 10% to the woman's body. Starting the camera from a lower height would resolve this. The problem with trying to replicate a "real life distance" with the cam position is the actual effect isn't equivalent. It's more distant, like Im a 7 foot 8 NBA player without glasses having sex with a woman "way down there". Requiring a zoom-in, once again, ruins image quality, at least at the current 8k max.

          The same concept above applies to standing missionary.

          There also needs to be more ass closeups, eye level gaping shots during anal too down by her ass. And closeups at the end with the facials. The cum play example I always refer to as the gold standard is the Freya Von doom SLR 8k scene, but for whatever reason, they choose not to replicate that.

          Overall, somehow flat porn has figured out a way to be dynamic and compelling, but most of VR misses this by its obsession with "accurate POV".

          While I don't have as high of opinion of their video quality as I used to (its okay though), Czech VR probably does the best in terms of that dynamism and closeup thing I'm talking about.

            doorsareopen You mention you're in the minority of those that prefer non POV. Well, I'm in your camp, and even if a minority, there's a lot of us and definately a market to be tapped.

            I especially prefer non POV for gangbangs. To me, the holy grail would be to have a studio who does videos like analvids.com but in non POV VR. (Though I can do without a piss version like they have). So far the most promising on that crazy hardcore end would be Putalocura VR, and sometimes SinsVR or Realjam, when they decide to do it. The closest actual video I've seen to the above described analvids style would be the Billie Star gangbang.

              xxxscottyxxx yes, it is worth it without a doubt over the Quest 2. I owned the Q2 and gave it to a friend for free. The fresnel lenses suck, and the resolution is dated. Unless you are blind you will see a significant difference if those are your only two reference points.

                  mebejoe Heresphere in SteamVR allows for further Zoom out than most other players. But at that point youre literally seeing the "circle" around the frame. But if thats what you want Heresphere is superior.

                    Vrsumo2017

                    saw the GREEN check mark the very first day...can't get there. i am clicking the shit of the pitch and moving joystick. it's just not coming up again after that very first time

                    maybe admin will update the app before the year end on this. kinda unwatchable with intention of jerking off

                      • [deleted]

                      • Post #403
                      • Edited

                      Ventriloquist_Tacos yes, it is worth it without a doubt over the Quest 2

                      Here are some of the issues I encountered:

                      Negatives:
                      • The LCD screens have high resolution, but the darks are terrible, especially when watching cinema films.
                      • The desktop computer interface is unacceptable for a device that requires a desktop PC for most media (128 GB storage for most sales). VirtualDesktop shouldn't be an essential purchase for a device at this price point.
                      • The nose cover lets in too much light, which is completely unacceptable. The device doesn’t work well in the dark.
                      • There is no default video app of acceptable quality, forcing consumers to buy software for essential functions (SkyBox or HereSphere, since Deo doesn't support letterbox or multiple language tracks).
                      • No suitable web browser. Meta browser is covered with advertisements that cannot be removed. (Can side-load Chromium, but Firefox Reality is dead)
                      • The Quest 3 is very expensive relative to its benefits over other devices. I have a Quest 2 and Gear VR. Out of these three, the Gear VR is better suited for my usage in certain scenarios (OLEDs for watching films, lighter device, more storage for travel, longer battery life to watch a full 2 hour film; much more secure and private; 1 TB + of storage, for when I'm too lazy to activate AirLink).
                      • Additionally, further registration is required to make the product usable (developer option to remove the guardian assistant, install custom home environments, download free content, ADB removal of bloatware).

                      Despite these drawbacks, I still don't regret purchasing the Quest 3. Overall, it is a great piece of technology and worth considering if you want an immersive VR experience.

                          • [deleted]

                          • Post #404

                          justsomedude101 some of the games

                          Move Fast from App Lab. It's free and lots of fun.

                            • [deleted]

                            • Post #405

                            albertleder Quest 3: 8/10

                            I agree. It would be 9/10 if it had a quantum dot layer. At this price point in should have had a quantum dot layer.

                              Heard the quest 3 lite will be with same lenses as q2, no color pass through, will come with no controllers but will have new chip as q3.

                              They say this it but not for sure.

                              But wtf, no color pass through? And same lenses as q2, my guess they just trying to get as much people to buy vr cuz they say it will 200 to 300$ its got the new chip, so probably at sum point q2 won't even be supported anymore.

                              Also I heard sum q3 users are saying they don't know if they got a defective pass through, I've notice some reviewers showing pass through look better then others, one video I saw guys pass through had a lot of grain.

                              Video q3 pt discussion

                              My guess, probably got tossed around maybe dropped during delivery. 🤷‍♂️

                                Vrsumo2017 Yeah, really hate they are making this headset. It will only keep back VR and give newcomers a sub par experience. All developers will also have to take that crappy headset into account when we finally have a decent Quest they should be targeting.

                                What I wished they would focus on instead is an actual quest pro (based on the quest 3 and unlike the first quest pro actually pro lol). With better passthrough, Oled, resolution and maybe they can even get a little more FOV. I really like the quest 3 but would buy a pro version like that in a heartbeat.

                                    Vrsumo2017 I heard otherwise, same crap fresnel lenses as Q2, but perhaps with better resolution panels.

                                    I agree with Sadlyitsbradley (YouTube) take. Really boring and bad direction Meta is taking things, if true about releasing a Quest Lite and axing plans for a Pro 2 anytime soon. Bottom of the barrel experiences for children people have been having for years instead of releasing a Quest Pro 2 with OLED and high res.

                                    Quest Pro 1 failed because of horrific marketing about using work apps, and for putting junky resolution LCD panels into a $1,500 HMD.

                                    If Meta were smart and released a device that was actually high end and compelling, like a Quest Pro 2 with 4k per eye resolution uOLED panels and a nice chipset and form factor, people would actually start to see VR's potential. Even if they sold way less than the regular Quest series (which they would), it would give them competitive product presence at a higher tier and be a good "cheaper" alternative to Apples device. Even priced at say, $1,750, it would be half the cost.

                                    As a Quest 3 fan, Meta sure manages to screw up product line decisions frequently which is why their VR division has lost billions of dollars. I want them to succeed.