a month later

justsomedude101

You guys really know how to disappoint.

People have been waiting for years that Anya finally gets an SLRO VR scene and you have the audacity to shoot an AR scene with her? Where is the VR content with her that we've been asking for? You know, VIRTUAL REALITY. What a joke.

But hey, I knew it already.

LordCrash They'd probably waste Anya for a PT scene though...

I deeply regret now that I made the suggestion in the first place.

      AlterEgo

      Yep that's disappointing. I don't watch PT scenes yet don't mind the occasional PT scene. Given the mixed enthuasiasm for PT (I am sure PT has its fans but almost all of us here are subbed for VR porn), for SUCH a hot and popular performer, a VR scene would appeal to more people than doing a PT scene. Seems like a waste to me.

      So yes my request still stands - a non-PT VR scene with Molly Little please!

        justsomedude101 Please, just seperate this PT nonsense from our VR subscription. It really feels like you're cheating us, and that you don't care how frustrating it is.

        This isn't VR.

        Why doesn't someone from the staff start a thread asking the users to vote? AR seperate from VR? Or no?

            TakingFredoFishing One of the most helpful things you (or anyone) who doesn't like Passthrough can do would be to provide feedback on things like the CGI background version of Serena Hill's scene, since we're actively looking at options that will be more appealing to folks who don't like passthrough or who don't have headsets that support Passthrough.

            We have no plans whatsoever to stop producing Passthrough content as there is a large number of folks who do happen to enjoy it, so any feedback/suggestions you have on making Passthrough content more palatable (for example with the CGI background) would be appreciated.

                justsomedude101 Thanks for the reply. While the CGI background to Serena Hill's scene made it slightly more palatable, the overall effect was like old VRCosplay backgrounds. They tried that years ago, and everyone hated it. I'm unclear as to why ayone at SLR thinks that it is a good solution to the PT problem. VR is best when it approximates reality in a way that tricks the mind and the eye. CGI backgrounds don't do this at all - they just look cheap.

                Further, nowhere in my comment did I say to stop producing PT scenes. The suggestion was to seperate them into another studio or subscription. Pehaps make the PT subscription cheap since it requires so much less investment. If PT is so popular, then people will pay to access it, right? They aren't getting it anywhere else, so they have to come here. MY point was that so many of us subbed to a VR site, not an AR one. Why force it on us, especially when it is really different on every level from what we signed up for?

                I also suggested a user poll, since you say you are interested in what the subscribers want. If PT is really that popular, the poll will reveal that and you'll shut all the complainers up for a while. Why not do it?

                    justsomedude101 We have no plans whatsoever to stop producing Passthrough content as there is a large number of folks who do happen to enjoy it, so any feedback/suggestions you have on making Passthrough content more palatable (for example with the CGI background) would be appreciated.

                    We ask you to sepearte AR and VR and no to stop producing it. Why do you guys just keep ignoring what we actaully say and make up stuff like that? Nowhere in his post did he ask you to stop making AR content in general.

                    And you really wonder why people get angry and frustrated with this place while you constantly act in a way that you either twist other people's take so much that they fit into your agenda or that you even lecture your users on what content was good for them and that everyone would agree how great your stuff was if they only tried or whatever...

                    justsomedude101 it, so any feedback/suggestions you have on making Passthrough content more palatable (for example with the CGI background) would be appreciated.

                    I gave my feedback already and nobody cared. I asked about the grey suits and just stated the obvious, that it doesn't work in VR at all with only th background in CG. Nobody answered (probably because nobody at SLR has a fucking clue themselves and just don't want to admit it). Nobody cared. I stated another obvious flaw that position variety is EXTREMELY limited in AR scenes. Nobody cared. Feels like what you actually want to hear is that CG was great and made the AR stuff so amazing for people (only) interested in VR. Well, no. It doesn't. It makes unwatchable scenes somewhat watchable but it doesn't make them good or even great VR scenes. In a world in which there is great VR stuff on other sites on a constant basis I don't have time for watching bad VR porn that was kind of generated out of AR porn. Mid stuff is bad stuff.

                          TakingFredoFishing Further, nowhere in my comment did I say to stop producing PT scenes. The suggestion was to seperate them into another studio or subscription. Pehaps make the PT subscription cheap since it requires so much less investment. If PT is so popular, then people will pay to access it, right? They aren't getting it anywhere else, so they have to come here.

                          Sorry if I misunderstood, that's my fault. We briefly had the PT releases separated as their own studio, but they performed substantially better when we they weren't separated (I don't have the data to show why, but my guess is that most users simply missed them under the separate name), so we stopped that plan. Currently we don't have any further plans to separate them or put them behind any sort of additional paywall or subscription. We consider them to be additional content on the platform just like everything else available with a Premium subscription.

                          TakingFredoFishing Why force it on us, especially when it is really different on every level from what we signed up for?

                          To be blunt - it's additional content users can choose to watch or not to watch, just like the other hundreds of studios and tens of thousands of scenes. SexLikeReal started back around 2015 as a site that strictly hosted 3rd party content, then SLRO's were introduced and occasionally released, then released more consistently once a week, then 2x per week, then 3x per week, and now roughly 3x per week with a PT release 1x per week. My point being that an SLR subscription is a constantly evolving thing, and that we don't see that extra 1 Passthrough scene as anything other than even more content included with a subscription.

                          LordCrash We ask you to sepearte AR and VR and no to stop producing it. Why do you guys just keep ignoring what we actaully say and make up stuff like that? Nowhere in his post did he ask you to stop making AR content in general.

                          And you really wonder why people get angry and frustrated with this place while you constantly act in a way that you either twist other people's take so much that they fit into your agenda or that you even lecture your users on what content was good for them and that everyone would agree how great your stuff was if they only tried or whatever...

                          100% my mistake for misunderstanding what was said. As for the rest - I won't waste either of our time by responding.

                          LordCrash I gave my feedback already and nobody cared. I asked about the grey suits and just stated the obvious, that it doesn't work in VR at all with only th background in CG. Nobody answered (probably because nobody at SLR has a fucking clue themselves and just don't want to admit it). Nobody cared. I stated another obvious flaw that position variety is EXTREMELY limited in AR scenes. Nobody cared. Feels like what you actually want to hear is that CG was great and made the AR stuff so amazing for people (only) interested in VR. Well, no. It doesn't. It makes unwatchable scenes somewhat watchable but it doesn't make them good or even great VR scenes. In a world in which there is great VR stuff on other sites on a constant basis I don't have time for watching bad VR porn that was kind of generated out of AR porn. Mid stuff is bad stuff.

                          If you provided some feedback, then thanks. The scene angles is something that's already been and is being discussed. The use of suits has been something discussed quit a bit as well, and I believe the plan is to continue using it. We can't really respond to every comment/piece of feedback, and I hope you nor anyone else is upset if changes aren't always made based on their feedback.