BML5768 You're still getting the amount of new weekly videos you subscribed for. At least 2 new VR videos every single week.
You obviously don't understand opportunity costs. Look it up.
BML5768 That's not what a logical fallacy is. But yes, the burger people are not going to get 4 burgers a week while the pizza fans get nothing. There is a big demand for the new stuff, so that's selfish and absurd.
Advocating for the stuff you like isn't absurd. It's absurd not to do it. It's up to SLR to decide what they want to do and whose tastes and expectations they want to satisfy. It's not my job to be nice to everyone, I pay money here in order to get as much back as I can. That's how capitalism works (and sorry, but we still live in capitalism).
BML5768 SLR subscription prices stay at where you subscribe at. So that's just false. I've been a sub for 3+ years and its still the $15/month deal I was offered (Thanks SLR, that's a great deal). I'm pretty sure they aren't raising costs on people who have paid for a lifetime sub years ago either.
It only stays the same if you stay subscribed without interruptions. And even then it's still one of the most costly sites in the whole world of porn right now. It's only understandable that people want to get the most out of it for themselves.
And I already told you that the lifeteime subscription is based on a promise. Break that promise and people get upset. It's simple.
BML5768 This logic also applies to the people who don't like the new content.
Sure. I don't recall that anybody said that it was absurd that you like this stuff and that you shouldn't be able to tell everybody that you like it and that you shouldn't be allowed to advocate for it and I don't recall that anybody who doesn't like passthrough here called those who like it names etc.
So maybe you misunderstood that statement above. I never said that you should just deal with everything and shouldn't be allowed to fight for the stuff you like. I said that you should deal with the fact that there are people who don't like stuff you like and that they will fight for their own tastes. There's not point in calling their POV absurd only because you don't agree with their tastes.
BML5768 There is room for both.
In reality, it means that they use resources and money on certain things and that they can't use the same resources and money on certain other things. That's exactly the concept of opportunity costs.. People aren't unhappy about getting less they are unhappy because they don't get more. And they are especially unhappy that certain very sparse resources (like editing capabilities and scripting resources) might spread thing to get all these new things covered as well. Resources aren't endless in reality, they are actually incredibly sparse. The VR porn business is a pretty niche business with only a very limited pool of resources. SLR struggles heavily to properly scale their business with noticable bottlenecks like scripting. As long as these bottlenecks aren't gone people have very good reason to be upset. And even if there are no bottlenecks at all they can still be unhappy about the direction SLR takes - and they have all right to voice their opinion without being called "crybabies" or whatever.