spacepirate not everyone wants this face-1-inch-from-the-camera thing you keep asking for.
I am not asking for a 1-inch-from-the-camera all the time. I'm asking for the camera to not always be a meter away and for the girls to interact, talk more inside the sex scenes, touch you, kiss you, be closer to what a real sex scene is, not just bouncing around a meter away. In the screenshots above the girl is close but you don't have double vision. And if she kiss you, you can close one eye to avoid double vision, a kiss is only a few seconds, but enhance the VR experience.
And I'm also not asking that all scenes have to be close-ups and face-to-face. In JAV VR (or real life) they are not. I love doggie, for example. You have to keep a balance between close and far, in JAV they get it, here they don't.
In movies of one or two hours as SLR and others shoots there is time to use all types of camera shots a few minutes and please everyone, but that does not happen.
There's one minute of close face-to-face in an hour-long movie and people complain. Instead we have to put up with 59 minutes of camera far away, and suck it up.
Sperson I have never been with woman who wants me leaning in a foot or closer during sex while we are both breathing heavily.
VR is not (yet) as real life. In real sex you "feel" the girl even if she is far away. In VR you don't have the sense of touch (yet), skin contact, actual penetration, etc., so if the girl is far away, it's not different than watching sex on TV. You need the girl to come close from time to time, feel her breathing, kiss you, touch you, look at you into the eyes, to feel that sense of realism that only VR can offer, and that in western porn is barely exploited.
She doesn't have to be close all the time, but a close sex scene from time to time in a movie to enhance the effect of presence and immersion is important and necessary in VR, in my opinion. It happens very rarely.
