• SLR
  • SLR Streaming vs Downloads data

I’m telling you, if Seinfeld came back on the air they’d make a Download Nazis episode.

doublevr Only 8% of users re-watch at least 60 sec of the same video in 2 month

I’ve taken my horse out of the race on this one as I went lifetime 2 1/2 years ago, but if this slow movement towards streaming only that you keep setting up with these posts (and comments in all the other posts) continues, you’re going to lose a lot of subscription renewals.

And these cherry-picked statistics and meaningless graphs say nothing. There’s a perception thing you’re not taking into account here. Take away people’s choices little by little, and soon enough they’ll stop choosing you.

Please stop this.

    doublevr also you made 2 threads for the same post which is spam and more annoying than progressive on the topic. I will spam the same issue here: shared internet places but you know that.

    arguing this however is pointless. I just reread this entire thread. let’s remind ourselves, the original post up top is a graph comparing minutes streamed on one axis to files downloaded on the other. Apples to Tennis Shoes. The graph that would actually say something is the one that compares time streamed to the time downloaded files get watched once downloaded…. minutes watched vs. minutes watched… not minutes vs. number downloaded. The meaningful comparison is obviously impossible, so instead this seeming and ever-evolving case to eliminate downloads at SLR is made via a steady drip of manufactured stats that could only convince people lacking the most basic understanding of math and data science.

    clearly doublevr either hasn’t read the patient and reasoned arguments above, just doesn’t care, or more likely both.

    Pulling this part of the thread back out too. That “bullshit” I was ordered to stop bringing…

    the key language there is “any time soon”, and what just happened…

    Probably better lock this thread too I guess

    Anyway, this is the portion of thread above that matters the most:

    gurphh So please don't go too far with this. I will leave if you do.

      argyle43 sorry about that. still 99.99% of users won't notice any limitation. we try to be reasonable on that

        doublevr to be fair, I’m not one that notices right now either. By and large I stream your content. But I also download the files I know I’m going to come back to, which on this site is mostly Nash multigirl scenes. I’m a picky bastard.

        All that said, I’m very sympathetic to those here upset to have their choices taken little by little and their voices not heard. Not everyone has the luxury of top level headsets or Gigabit service. The more people you can accommodate out there, the more robust SLR will be.

        My observations with VR is that those of us that have made the commitments needed to view quality content are more than happy to pay for the privilege to do so, but it’s a two way street.

        I appreciate your response, but I think you should listen to the growing dissatisfaction and back off from these heavy-handed policies.

        No more threads like these. You either stream or you download.

        People who stream: people with the money to fork out gigabyte internet or/and don't share the internet.

        People who download: people who share the internet.

        No more stream vs download thread cause there is no point of a thread: unless SLR makes an announcement, poor reviews from ex subscribers. SLR loses to other competition like vrcosplayx or virtualtaboo cause - those sites allow downloads

        No more stream vs download threads.

          • [deleted]

          Punksxc People who stream: people with the money to fork out gigabyte internet or/and don't share the internet.

          People who download: people who share the internet.

          ^-- This is an excellent observation.