bacula8630 Speaking generally - yes, we are being overly cautious on every front when it comes to all thing Compliance. That's a large part of why we've been more aggressive than many other sites, out of an "abundance of caution". Those are just about all the details I have. Personally, I would assume it comes down to other factors as well, for example the size/user base of SLR compared to other VR sites making it a potentially larger focus, wanting to keep ahead of current compliance trends, doing the cost-benefit analysis and deciding losing some subscribers is a safer bet than the risk involved for hosting certain types of content, etc. Again, those are just my personal assumptions.
Also in general - I have no problem with feedback/criticism of our Compliance process (or pretty much any aspect of the site, lord knows we get plenty of it). In the case of @LordCrash's comment I suspended him because of the verbiage used and the hostility involved, which I've asked him on previous occasions to stop. If someone can read his comment and not understand why it may have seemed out-of-line or could have been written in a less hostile/inflammatory way, then I don't imagine we'll ever see eye-to-eye on it and there's not much left to say.
