VRProdigy I see your response back to my email now, thanks for replying back, looks like you're getting them and we're all connected now
Create scripts and earn money on SexLikeReal
2 months later
The premium account is supposed to have 3 free downloads per month right? I haven't downloaded anything in at least 1-2 months and the scripts all are $3.99 or $5.99, do I need to do anything to activate the free ones?
- Edited
ethicalperv can you please check if you can see a download button under haptics tab? Its an arrow next to the script heat map
5 days later
Don't bother working with them.
Their communication is super bad, you wont get anything done.
- Edited
So i'm not the same guy, but i also had a pretty frustrating experience with the scripting program.
I sent in my first script attempt at the end of June. It took 12 days before i got feedback on that scene.
I sent in another script in early July. I didn't hear anything back for i think 20 days on that one so i emailed Kieshi to ask if they lost it. A few days later i got feedback . so about 24 total days for that one.
My final scene i sent in early August. Again i waited almost 20 days before emailing to ask what happened. a few days later i was told it was rejected and to email QA directly. So i emailed QA. A couple days later RealCumber emailed me back and told me he would look at my script when he had time. So at that point it had been about 24 days again and i still didn't have any feedback other than the script was rejected.
At this point i gave up on scripting. Even though the feedback i eventually got wasn't terrible and the script could have been fixed in a couple hours i was just really frustrated with the 20-30 days wait.
HughMungus I am very sorry you experienced this delay, normally this does not happen and we will definitely do our best to improve communication from our side.
As I told you before, we did not reject you and are happy to continue cooperation, when the script is improved.
I have asked guys to create a small manual for script creators, which should help make the QA requirements more understandable, I will send it your way when it is ready.
I am sure @RealcumberScripts can add to this from the QA side.
Kieshi I think it was just unfortunate timing. This all happened while SLR was working on putting out 1000 AI scripts so i think the QA department was just overwhelmed with reviewing those.
HughMungus just to make sure, I have asked about the script you sent last and the status on the review once again. I will get back to you soon
Oh i did get feedback on that scene a couple days after our conversation on eroscript
HughMungus could we then expect to see improved version of this script sent back to us? 
As I said - we are open for cooperation and I would be happy to help if there is anything else you require
Kieshi I'm taking a break from scripting right now, but if i decide to get back into it i will try to fix that script and resubmit it.
Kieshi Sorry to hear this as well - though indeed there has been an increase in new changes and script QA of manual and AI, responses and QA still need to be returned in order and there are also many scripters that have more detailed questions and need more detailed scripting assistance which takes some further time.
There also seems to have been some rare email transmission issues as of late so please always check your spam folders or please dont hesitate to reach out again to myself or Kieshi for any followups in case any emails may have not come through and we can follow up right away
Nonetheless, we of course will look into improving any communication issues, and the small faq manual Kieshi mentioned should greatly assist with that
6 days later
- Edited
Kieshi I'm pretty picky about scripts, but I used the script @HughMungus posted on EroScripts (for free) and thought it was great - certainly better than some others you have published here, and light-years better than the AI crap that doesn't even GET QA anymore.
Not sure what you disliked, but I think you dropped the ball big time on this.
I'm concerned that you will be so focused on that AI crap that good craft scripters will get tired of the process here, and we'll be stuck with whatever @RealcumberScripts feels like scripting, and a whole bunch of AI.
TakingFredoFishing Our QA ensures consistent quality for all scripts, so the script not passing QA does not mean script is bad or will never be allowed on SLR, there might be a few small bits and pieces that have to be adjusted or corrected.
Kieshi I get that, but you don't apply that same standard to AI before you publish it. Meanwhile excellent handmade scripts like this get returned. It's like you guys deliberately do the opposite of what subscribers want 
TakingFredoFishing Thanks for the kind words.
In the end i understand why they didn't like my script. I missed a 20-30 second section of implied stroking during the intro because it was off camera. They also wanted me to reduce stroke lengths throughout the video though, that part i am not a big fan of because short strokes just don't feel as good, but SLR handcrafted scripts have been moving in that direction for a while now. Even the new Cumber scripts don't feel as good as the ones he used to make because of their shorter stroke requirements. Unfortunately this is making the AI scripts feel better than crafted scripts at this point outside of their jankyness, maybe that was always their goal though
TakingFredoFishing Kieshi I'm pretty picky about scripts, but I used the script @HughMungus posted on EroScripts (for free) and thought it was great - certainly better than some others you have published here, and light-years better than the AI crap that doesn't GET QA anymore.
@Will65 - Out of curiosity, I happened to check the free script @HughMungus posted, and it looks like the script is a different version was uploaded that we did not review (assuming a new improved version was rather posted)
It's easy to make assumptions, but scripts under the program especially need to be checked in their entirety, and there is an important fact that we have several toys supported at SLR to consider playback support for.
Thus we continually need to strive for a balance, maintain variation, avoid numbness, and stay true to authenticity of the scene in a script, and also keep in mind future use cases, which includes any future SLR toys which we have aimed to have even greater stroke length variation and precision
Kieshi TakingFredoFishing Our QA ensures consistent quality for all scripts, so the script not passing QA does not mean script is bad or will never be allowed on SLR, there might be a few small bits and pieces that have to be adjusted or corrected.
Thanks for pointing that out @Kieshi - the SLR $500 program offers a significant amount for a single script and due diligence needs to be applied to ensure scripts are checked fully for completion and necessary adjustments applied to ensure SLR capital is spent wisely and not frivolously
RealcumberScripts The version of my Agatha Vega scene on Eroscript is the same version i sent you. The version of Out of Bounds i posted on eroscript is a completely remade version of the script i sent to SLR in early July because it was originally scripted at 30 FPS and completely out of sync. I didn't send it to SLR after i remade it because you guys were still holding my Agatha Vega scene and i was told to only send 1 script at a time. I still used exaggerated stroke lengths in the new version though so i'm sure it would not have been accepted in that form.
TakingFredoFishing I understand your concern and thank you for bringing this up. AI scripts are being reevaluated and will be remade, probably more than once. The main idea behind the AI scripts is that it is better to have AI script, than no script at all for the time being, until a hand-made script comes around from our dedicated creators.
There are many scripts in progress and we get more people joining our scripting programs each month, so there will definitely be no shortage of great hand-made scripts.