I really relied on these contact sheets to properly pick out a scene I want to watch.
Discovery is much harder without them; restoring contact sheets would help me use SLR more.
Missing thumbnail contact sheets
fuccaneer You'd think that if things are bad for them financially they would be trying to keep subscribers, not pissing people off by taking away useful features that we like.
DVR is as stubborn as the day is long so I have little doubt that contact sheets are gone for good.
I've had annual subs for at least 6 years now, and I have always used and relied on the contact sheets to help me choose which scenes I wanted to DL. I hate the site without them, the short preview vid and 4 promo pics are useless so I simply won't be renewing.
- Edited
Not many things would make me stop supporting SLR, but this is one of them. Bring it back, this was a very stupid decision. I think you massively underestimated how much these are relied upon for shopping scenes. Many trailers don't show all the content in a scene. This was a very anti-consumer move. If it won't be included on the new site either, I'm officially done with SLR.
- Edited
fuccaneer none of that. Just optimizing transcoding flow for faster releases. Surprisingly CS takes significant rendering time and slows release process.
Also every feature takes some maintenence and qa costs - it's important we can justify it.
Anyway let me see if we can move it down the list so we can release videos without CS and generate it separately later on without holding scene release
doublevr Surprisingly CS takes significant rendering time
I'm not buying that. 48 downscaled screenshots of a scene is something a script could do in minutes. That's a drop in the ocean compared to the video encoding you guys have to do.
doublevr Also every feature takes some maintenence and qa costs - it's important we can justify it.
It's a stable feature that hasn't seen any significant change is years, what possible maintenance and QA would be needed?
doublevr Anyway let me see if we can move it down the list so we can release videos without CS and generate it separately later on without holding scene release
Thanks. That middle ground would be appreciated.
- Edited
Sounds to me like they're working on the margins. IOW: they have a punchlist of a bunch of tiny little things that either slow the process by 0.01% or increase resource costs by 0.01% and they're trying to fix them all in hopes of having a decent combined positive effect.
The problem, of course, is that each of these changes must be considered on its own to determine the 2nd order impacts like "does this change worsen the user experience". We all know that SLR doesn't do that very well--its easier to make a snap judgment then look for some number to justify the decision.
And now we get to maybe the crux of the matter: the tech bro mantra of "move fast and break things". This lack of caution and the tendency to gamble that the end result will be worth pissing off some customers. IMHO this kind of mentality has so permeated tech that they use it even in inappropriate situations like this -- this is the unwritten second part of the mantra "move fast and break things; then go back and fix them later".
It's getting fixed. Should be back online within a few weeks or up to some few months.
Moving it to ai so you can expect some hottest frames and intelligence
- Edited
doublevr Moving it to ai so you can expect some hottest frames and intelligence
I'm not convinced that you understand why people use it. Nobody uses it because they want to see the hottest frames – that's what the promo shots are for. People want to see how the video actually plays out.
Hairsational This!
Don't overthink it. Doesn't have to be AI. We just want a quick visual summary. It's such an easy and quick thing to do.
Hairsational I'm not buying that. 48 downscaled screenshots of a scene is something a script could do in minutes. That's a drop in the ocean compared to the video encoding you guys have to do.
I use a small program that can produce contact sheets in seconds.
Hairsational Exactly, contact sheets are essentially a visual description of the action and what plays out over the duration of the scene. Tags might say "Cum on body" but where exactly? On her feet? On her stomach? On her tits? A contact sheet will show me so I don't need to guess. Or a tag might say "pussy closeups" but then there might only be 8 seconds of actual closeups in the whole scene, so in this instance the tag is a bit misleading. Contact sheets show me the majority of positions and rough estimate of time spent in those positions, visuals, etc, and also video specs such as bitrate and runtime. The tags, promo pics and preview vid can be misleading and not accurately show what is in the scene. Some studios use promo pics that aren't even in the actual scene.
I use a small paid program called VTM (Video Thumbnails Maker) and it can create contact sheets in seconds. I can add a batch of 10-12 vr videos and create contact sheets for all of them in under a minute. How is SLR currently creating contact sheets if it "takes significant rendering time and slows release process"?
- Edited
erniescar69 Oh I believe it, I was deliberately being very generous with that time.
doublevr > "Moving it to ai so you can expect some hottest frames and intelligence"
First off, thanks for listening to our feedback! Glad this feature is returning.
AI powered contact sheets sound like a great idea, let's be honest, a fixed timestamp often results in extreme repetition, and often misses some of the most unique moments. HOWEVER I get the argument others are making against it.
Could you perhaps generate both? And let people use whichever they like? If you're already generating one, we're talking about a trivial amount of compute/storage to generate the other.
- Edited
I just find it crazy they removed it for videos they already had it on. Why? There is no good reason for it. Are you trying to save pennies from the little bit of storage taken up from these images lol? I can no longer shop scenes with confidence, so I've completely stopped buying. I always thought SLR did things right by making them accessible to all logged in users, unlike many sites where they conceal it from you unless subscribed.
I have never used contact sheets. I don't even know how to find them.
I always just clicked on the video so it would start playing and then skip forward to see how things changed. Are contact sheets a lot better than this method?
Also if it is a cost thing and people seem to like and use the contact sheet then I can think of lots of things SLR does that surely cost way more but I bet nobody uses. How much is SLR investing into CGI porn? How about server space for flat that nobody asked for.
I just want what made SLR good 4 or 5 years ago. All the things they had then, like well made good 3somes. (all the time not just 1 every 3 months).
rerun119 > "I don't even know how to find them."
On the 'photos' tab, right below the four standard sample photos, there used to be a button called 'all photos' (or something?), if you clicked on that it would take you to the contact sheet. VERY useful when you want to quickly browse a scene.
I'm sure it saves SLR way more bandwidth than it costs to generate/serve, so it's a good thing for everyone that they are bringing it back.
- Edited
rerun119 That's really surprising. Have you never gone to a scene page on the website and clicked the buttons?
- Edited
Let's explore further how this current SLR non-thumbnail world can be inefficient and/or misleading when trying to determine the content of a given scene...
Hmmm, "Melissa In Your Room". That seems like a nice bedroom scene. Let's check it out.
https://cdn-vr.sexlikereal.com/images/55536/vr-porn-Melissa-In-Your-Room-AV-cover-app.jpg
That sure seems like its going to be a "gym" or "workout" theme to me--what happened to the bedroom?. Probably a solo vid too because there's no other person in the cover photo, right?
Let's hover over the thumbnail and watch the preview.
https://cdn-vr.sexlikereal.com/preview/14x1/56102_300p.mp4
* Note the above isn't cropped like the hover previews are. In the hover preview there's no other person to be seen.
Well, all I can see is Melissa, so this reinforces that its a solo scene...with maybe some simulated sex.
Melissa is looking hot so let's take a look at the scene page.
https://i.pstorage.space/i/0bpZQ5bAd/original_Melissa_in_your_gym.jpg
Ugh, WALLOFTEXT. TL;DR.
Skip over the Video Specifications because not-a-nerd.
Oh, there's some tags. "Blow Job"? I thought this was Solo. "Cowgirl", "Reverse Cowgirl", "Cumshots" Waitaminute--all this wasn't in the hover preview. Let's check the Photos...
https://i.pstorage.space/i/k81J931wL/original_Melissa_in_your_gym_NONPOV.jpg
Well, now I'm really confused. Is this alpha passthrough or what? And what is up with the gym? Oh, look there's a dick--I guess its not Solo. Wait, why am I seeing all this man body...this must be Non-POV.
This would be so much easier if we had like a collection of screenshots from the video itself so we could quickly see what the POV was, what positions, what the background is, etc.
I guess we have to start the video in the browser in order to figure out whats what with this vid._
Buffering...buffering. Ok, no gym.
Fast-forward. Well, it starts POV. Still looks Solo though.
Fast-forward. It looks like she's giving a blowjob but I can't see the dick. Is this simulated sex?
Fast-forward. Reverse cowgirl. Still can't see the penetration...must be simulated sex.
Fast-forward. Cowgirl. Yup, no penetration--definitely solo with simulated sex.
Fast-forward,. POV kissing. Solo.
Fast-forward. Close up. Clearly solo.
Fast-forward. Missionary. 3/4 of the way through. This is absolutely Solo with simulated sex. But at least its POV.
Fast-forward. Missionary with feet. I don't remembering seeing "Feet" in the tags. Still simulated sex though.
Fast-forward. Doggy Style. Simulated.
Fast-forward. Handjob/Cumshot. Minute 55:21 out of duration 56:21 and it looks like there may be a dick or a dildo. Wut?
10 minutes later and we still don't really know what the hell is up with this vid.
OR
Click Photos, then Thumbnails, and look at...
OK, no gym, alpha passthrough, totally POV. Oh there's some penetration--definitely not simulated sex. Handjob, blowjob, reverse cowgirl, cowgirl, armpit action, POV kissing, looks like conversation, close up from the rear (mmm, butthole), close missionary, far missionary, oh feet action (thats new), and it looks like it finishes with doggie.
That took like 2 seconds to determine all that info via thumbnail contact sheets.