To be honest I like what SLR are doing with Drive and attempting to get more viewers by adding 2D content which will then increase VR viewers and content - it's just the way they go about things is what I have an issue with
I do wonder if it's 1 guy at the top making these decisions on a whim or if they have multiple people planning and agreeing on a realistic roadmap
Is there pressure to reduce costs from AV1 server bills or is SLR just taking this opportunity to strip people of features and increase profits?
Right now it seems like half-baked things are randomly announced and implemented and rightly get a lot of negative feedback from the community
Leadership and feature stability isn't something SLR is known for these days and it's a shame, they have one of the biggest VR libraries and so much potential but these rash decisions are scaring away paying customers and tarnishing the brand
Just the fact that people have to spend hours reading the forums to get an idea of what changes are happening is eye opening. Any other company of this size would have big decisions planned out in advance and make a proper announcement via blog posts and emails - but instead SLR flip-flops on forums
Reading the video comments on recent SLR uploads has people asking why Original Quality downloads are disabled, they got yoinked with no notice, no discussion, no nothing