xeddin1 You said that they will be the exact same except that the non-pov will be removed.
Thank you for doing this. I hope everybody sees them because I don't see your other videos. Maybe because I have compilations turned off.
Maybe it's just me but I would like it if the blowjob from the belly was removed. It doesn't fit into POV from my point of view. It's just another weird non-pov angle.

    I guess I can't even chick on your page if I don't have compilations turned on. I tried and it just takes me back to the page with on the other sites that are on SLR.

    rerun119
    Yeah belly pov has been removed.
    Two of them have been uploaded (not published). They are in moderation / transcoding queue for SLR.
    The third is just finishing up being rendered on my computer and I will upload that today.
    So hopefully 3 will be up within 24 hours.

    HughMungus
    There isn't really a number. Watch time, downloads, and likes are the best indicator. I don't really have an exact number

    So, they will be added to sandbox which hurts.
    But regardless, if you guys want them I will create. I will do 3 per week.

    • [deleted]

    xeddin1 Thanks again, and good luck to you. I don’t really get how that sandbox works, I thought only the least-watched scenes end up there. Not fair.

    For what it’s worth, I just favorited your channel and added it to my browser bookmarks bar. I’m not into PMVs, unfortunately, but I’ll be checking out your channel for cases like this.

      [deleted]
      Essentially sandbox means that no one will ever see it unless they go to my channel

      xeddin1 Thank you so much for this. I don't know why SLR wouldn't just do it?
      Someone should write on all the videos in the comment section about these.
      The comment section is full of people hating the non-pov mixed in.
      I can not write in the comment section because I got banned for saying things like everybody else is about the non-pov stuff. So you or somebody else should give people a heads up.
      BTW being able to get to your page is not easy. So even if you tell people you are going to have to tell them about turning on compilation.
      It sucks for probably 90% of the SLR users because they will never know these much needed fixes exist.

        rerun119
        Unfortunately, there is no easy fix.
        If SLR were to make the edits, then there could end up being multiple copies of the same video with slight variation. This would cause another reason for uproar.
        If someone were to make edits (like myself) it is sent to the graveyard to die (there is no toggle for this, it is just a death sentence). But what can be done?

          xeddin1 Easy – SLR could listen to feedback and not release videos that randomly switch from POV to non-POV (or non-POV to POV). If John Strong insists on doing non-POV, then release an entirely separate video with those shots.

            SchnuppiLilac xeddin1 On checking this seemed to be the case. Thanks.
            But isn't this just bad logic. If I am able to search up a studio name, atleast let me know that it won't be shown. A simple popup telling me that compilations should be toggled would have worked fine. Instead I'm sent to that listing of studios page. Like why?
            Obviously it is some backend logic searching for your studio on that page, couldn't find it as this toggle hides it, and just leaves us on that listing page. But this flow from UX perspective is messed up.

              alphaRonaldo
              I agree. I think when you click a studio name and it takes you back to the list of all creators it seems like a bug. Especially when the default setting is to hide pages like this.

              It would be better to instead take you to their page, hide the videos, and have a message saying “please enable compilations via the compilation filter to view videos” … or something like that