metichemsi The problem is that he states this 'test' video was filmed in 5.7k.
Arsians_com This video is in 5.7k, we have since upgraded the camera to deliver 8k60 content and redid the scenes, but we want to release the three prototype scenes we rendered first since they were a lot of work.
The output weβre seeing doesnβt appear to be 5.7Kβit looks more like 2K, which is far below the quality expected from 6K or higher footage. Whether itβs a test or not, if he says the test footage is 5.7K, that quality should be evident. Regardless of the camera capturing 6K or 8K, improper rendering can severely degrade the quality. Itβs possible that a proxy was rendered instead of the main file. This may suggest an issue with his computer and not the camera itself.
Addressing the quality isnβt an insult or nitpickingβitβs constructive feedback to help identify potential problems. Do you believe the output was truly 6K? Thatβs the claim he made. If his goal was to deliver 6K-quality footage, then the attempt failed. Unless he resolves the rendering issues, upgrading to an 8K camera wonβt improve the resultsβthe same subpar quality will persist if the rendering process remains flawed.