adinihsan No, what's simple is having a video just for edging and one video for the complete experience. THAT is simple. Why should a video have to be terribly spliced and hodgepodged together and become totally immersion breaking just because a few scenes overlap? You've attacked a good studio just because you're emotionally driven by a slop haphazard sloganized rule instead of driven by logic. You have one video that does this and one video that does this and that and they are clearly different videos for different people or different tastes. No one is confused by these two because everyone understands the difference edging blowjobs and vaginal penetration. But apparently that's not good enough. "I don't ever wanna see the same frame twice," even though nothing stops you from just not watching it or blocking the studio.
adinihsan Go to Agatha’s page and there are still 3-4 vids which are 100% entirely duplicated into other videos. How could you possibly want and defend that…
Cute Strawman, but you can keep it. Let's say some people of ethnicity X commit crimes, does that mean all people of ethnicity X are bad? Because by your logic, yes. I disagree. I think we should only get rid of the duplicates, the bad actors, and keep the scenes that are clearly different because they have different purposes and created in good faith.
And BTW if you want to defend something why the hell does Render Pleasure get to exist under this new and hardfast rule? Those are not new videos or content. It's literally recycled content with a new background. You can not by any rational logic demand that VRedging not be allowed to create new content in videos created for a different audience and yet not also demand that Render Pleasure be stricken from the site.
