haha and you call this PT ?!? Really ?? lol
What happened with SLR Passthrough Alpha videos ? No update for months ?!s
boboweb Does it matter what I call it? I'll call it any way you want if that's the way you need it. One condition:
PT crackheads are suffering from withdrawl lol
boboweb Florane Russell, Olivia Sparkle, and Charlie Red also shot and awaiting release. 7 other scheduled bookings also coming up for the EU Passthrough studio. so should be ramping up quickly.
- Edited
SchnuppiLilac are we getting a raw alpha version with out the cgi back ground for that video?
Vrsumo2017 are we getting a raw alpha version with out the cgi back ground for that video?
The team has been discussing this, re-releasing with the alpha-channel added in so the "forest bleed issue" can be avoided. Stay tuned.
justsomedude101 THANK YOU.
I did not watch the new PT scene but I did read the comments.
I read people saying the distances are way to far away. For the life of me do not understand why any new director would not shoot a bunch of test distances before spending money on making a scene. This has happened with every new director and happened with the new cameras. How could they not know this is important?
This just makes the studio look bad. It hurts them more by having bad scenes than it does by having more scenes. There are studios that I just don't even try to watch anymore because of being let down in the past. Double has shown that people don't spend a lot of time watching VR porn so they turn it on and quickly watch a scene or two. If they waste time on a poorly made video then the next time they will skip it.
My only guesses are that the directors do not watch VR in their personal life or there is so much pressure on them to get a scene out as quickly as possible.
Vrsumo2017 When I am reading some of the complaints in the comments for the video, I am wondering if people actually watched it. VRCosplay 2017, this is not PT, bring back alpha PT - this is an alpha PT vid, just press the alpha PT button and the background will be gone. The main problem is the forest bleed (and maybe the voice over). Otherwise, it was not so bad for a first try in terms of scaling and positioning.
rerun119 I read people saying the distances are way to far away. For the life of me do not understand why any new director would not shoot a bunch of test distances before spending money on making a scene.
Just to give my perspective.
I think the distance is fine in doggy and missionary but far too close in laying cowgirl. I can't figure out why people think that's too far away when in PT the dick is literally in my navel during laying down positions.
I'm average high (6 feet) so it can't be because I'm too tall so I figured that maybe they are below average but every time I've asked for the height of those that yell 'too close' in other scenes I don't get a reply, so I don't know.
Then there's the prople that just want to be 'close to the action' and don't give a guck about correct distance. It's fine of course - whatever floats your boat, but it's just not POV in my book.
So I don't know. I obviously can't see what these people are seeing but I can't get my head around that a stunt cock that is fine in doggy/missionary and literally in my naval in laying position is 'too far away'.
I'll be honest if they move the camera closer I'm out.
OliverDK distance is fine in doggy and missionary but far too close in laying cowgirl. I can't figure out why people think that's too far
I am about the same height and could make all positions work except one. Even laying CG worked for me in a reclined seating position by dragging the picture up a little. The only bit that didn't fit was the third missionary when watching it standing, dick being at belly button level.
- Edited
SchnuppiLilac Even laying CG worked for me in a reclined seating position by dragging the picture up a little.
But you shouldn't recline seating to make it work imo. I lay down an put a pillow behind my head like I do with my partner in that position and the dick is literally around my belly button. I don't get why some can claim this is 'too far away'... I just don't get it.
SchnuppiLilac The only bit that didn't fit was the third missionary when watching it standing, dick being at belly button level.
So not too far away, right?
OliverDK So not too far away, right?
No. If anything, then it's too close. But I don't take the comment in which that was said too seriously anyway.
boboweb I stand with boboweb. SimsenseMedia SLR Originals AR videos were absolutely amazing paired with Quest 3, especially the most recent releases. Please reconsider resuming production.
I haven't watched the latest AR release from MannySX, however, the trailer alone is cringe. I'll have to report back.
Main note for the director is FFS KEEP THE FUCKING COCK IN THE SAME PLACE IN THE FRAME. ALWAYS.
Anyone skipping through the scene is going to see some random floating dick all over the damned frame, it's terrible for immersion, it's a problem for VR in general and I've never heard a good reason why consistent cock position / distance is not the default. Baffling.
SchnuppiLilac I still gotta watch it in the headset, but I saw the forest glow trying it on the mobile slr pt. Why I asked about a raw alpha
Going check it out
- Edited
OliverDK I've asked for the height of those that yell 'too close' in other scenes I don't get a reply, so I don't know.
That's why I say we need profiles for all male models, their height, dick size it's like picking your avatar in vr p. Let's see who's dick avatar I wanna use to day, ah yes gusto his dick will do says here on his profile he's a super soaker, lol
I said instead of putting their actual face for profile pic put their stunt cock, I just thought it be funny, but really idk... maybe put a cool full body pic of them erected. But it's gotta be something cuz I been saying this for years add the male models name and profile too.
I think they started adding sum cuz I found some male profiles.
But yeah it should be like picking an avatar when it comes to going threw the male model profiles.
- Edited
SchnuppiLilac Otherwise, it was not so bad for a first try in terms of scaling and positioning.
Yeah wasn't that bad, scaling was on the small side but HOS fixes that, I had my zoom at -8, the glow is noticeable but haf it just looks like sum futuristic hologram, picture quality was kinda meh but with the pt on it blends in with the not so great meh pass through.
Story wise, I thought it was unique, something different
Definitely a hottie.
Edit
Man, it really not bad, in a dim room and turn the contrast and brightness on the video it blends in nicely and the glow hardly noticeable.
rerun119 Think that would end up very shaky unless the guy is completely still