SexLikeReal Cancels Jimmy Lifestyles Channel

phyuggene

[deleted] All of this was orchestrated by SLR as some form of advertising.

There is that saying "there is no such thing as bad publicity" but I don't think that's what happened here. Why would SLR intentionally drag their own name and Jimmy's through the mud and risk boycotts from performers? SLR did let everything stew for a few days before making a decision but none of it looked orchestrated to me.

[deleted] SLR could've integrated Jimmy under another name without anyone even noticing, take Nash as an example a faceless dude as the head of SLR's production.

Doubt that would have made much difference. It wouldn't take long for performers or more observant subscribers to learn that Jimmy is working for or with SLR. It might only have delayed the drama.

petermc

[deleted] SLR could've integrated Jimmy under another name without anyone even noticing,

I’m pretty sure the girls would notice who was directing the scene! Even if he wasn’t acting unprofessionally/abusively, it wouldn’t have taken long for it to get around that he was back.

Anyway, we don’t have to worry about it anymore as it’s not happening so there’s little point in continuing to discuss this creep. I’ve no idea why, after cancelling the channel, SLR gave him this platform to spout his bullshit. Just makes it feel like they only cancelled the channel due to outside pressures and still want to support him.

doublevr

petermc I'd wish i can seat all day long posting stupid shit.
not

[deleted]

I thought I made it pretty clear in my last post, didn't think I needed to elaborate further. Just a couple of examples I gave should've sufficed!

Could Jimmy be a director in disguise and avoid all this mess? Answer: Definitely Yes

Alex Nash is the perfect example I already gave before; Jimmy could've just taken a simple alias like 'Alex Stone' or something, avoids the 20 girls that spoke against him before, some of them are retired from mainstream now. He could've just worked with fresh faces who entered the scene post-2019. Easy, right? Even Emma Hix might've worked with him, if what he claims is true and she's actually moved on.
Melody Marks scene is another prove, everyone was buzzing about it, eagerly sharing and waiting, not a soul had a clue it was Jimmy behind the camera until @doublevr announced Jimmy's return, causing everyone to connect the dots.

Why Jimmy chose SLR to do this stunt? Here are a few guesses, but honestly, it feels like stating the obvious:

SLR has been best VR site for the last 4 years.. Duhh!
SLR were looking for new directors, and made a thread for it. Check it out
Doublevr himself messaged and probably proposed this idea in the first place. Check it out

@phyuggene SLR did let everything stew for a few days before making a decision

No, not really a few days, you can't count it from the beginning. Already mentioned that fans/subscribers had one role which was to tip off Alex Coal about what's been happening, other than that I gave the example of passthrough, and how long those people been trying to stop SLR from shooting them but they had no effect, in fact SLR started shooting even more PT.

The real chaos kicked off when Alex Coal tweeted she wouldn't shoot for SLR as long as Jimmy was around, and it took SLR just 17 hours and 40 minutes to freak out when a couple of models backed her up, promptly locking that thread.

petermc I’d personally have deleted that thread rather than just locked it.

That's not your opinion though, you basically just echoed what Alex Coal said like 2 days ago then deleted it (I couldn't find it), when she said that caused SLR to panic react again and hid that thread for a few hours and restored it again. I found that deleted tweet on Wankz forum thanks to our fellow @argyle43

And personally I could say the same thing, I don't know why they locked that thread in the first place, I'm a huge supporter of freedom of speech and really hate it when people get silenced as long as they're not trespassing the community guidelines if they existed. Alex Coal pushed for the deletion of everything related to Jimmy, highly disagree with that, she can't just keep bullying SLR into doing what she wants.

This ain't over until we know what's happening to the scenes Jimmy's already shot. I don't mind buying them elsewhere, like on Manyvids or OF, yeah, pretty sure you don't mind watching them either, @petermc. Already proved this in the other thread the other day, anyway.

Edit: In green, I've added some words I missed when I wrote this because I was tired.

petermc

doublevr I’m just telling you how it looks. On the one hand you cancel the channel, supposedly in solidarity with all these performers, and then, on the other hand, you invite him to come on here telling lies and badmouthing them all.

It’s mixed messaging at best.

doublevr

petermc
It's a complex controversial matter.
We did cancel the channel for everyone's better promoting high ethical standards in porn.

I see nothing wrong to get Jimmy for the first time telling his side of the story whatever way he chose. The whole thing got out of hands quickly and we locked it. Not sure why he had chosen SLR for that as it's clear not the right place for it.

I can't see what we are doing wrong. I'd appreciate everyone to make a step back and look for sanity instead of provoking even further this shit show. It doesn't make anyone happy. Let's just settle on things and find a way for everyone out there to move on with there lives.

petermc

doublevr If Jimmy wants to say his piece, he’s allowed to, of course, I’m just not sure it was the right decision to give him the platform to do it here, especially after you cancelled the channel, like I said, mixed messages.

He’s had 5 years to tell his side of the story and endless outlets to do it, like twitter, instagram, facebook, other adult discussion forums etc. I’d personally have deleted that thread rather than just locked it.

I wasn’t looking to stir up shit though and I’ve said my piece now so I’ll leave it there.

chanser

doublevr you made the right call, time to move on. there is lots of good porn to come, i hope solo and all girl gets a boost😃

hypertsunaz

Silly-Sausage Does that hypothetical matter?

petermc

[deleted] pretty sure you don't mind watching them either, @petermc. Already proved this in the other thread the other day, anyway.

Dude, your weird repeated whataboutism argument to defend an alleged abuser is lame, this isn’t about who I’d hypothetically (It obviously would never actually happen) sleep with. I mentioned that I would have sex with a hot girl even if she’d done a bad thing. That’s entirely different to the very real situation of being responsible for employing them in an environment where they could continue doing that thing and harm more people.

Have I watched Wankzvr scenes that Jimmy directed when he was there? Yes. Are there scenes he did that I will likely continue to go back to? Yes. Like I said in that comment, I’m shallow when it comes to sexual attraction and/or jerking off to porn. However, do I think, after what he did, that mainstream porn sites should support him to make more of those scenes? No. Would I financially support a site that did so? No.

As for the comment about a tweet from Alex Coal, sharing a similar opinion to someone else doesn’t invalidate my opinion. She made a good point and I agree with her.

I really didn’t want to comment further but you repeatedly throwing that throwaway comment from last year in my face meant I had to address it. I don’t purport to be a saint, I never have, I’m a shallow pervert who jerks off to porn on a regular basis. As a pervert however, I’m grateful to the girls who provide me with that entertainment and, if I can do some small thing to help keep them safer, I will.

[deleted]

petermc Just to clarify, I want to make it clear that I'm not defending him, never have, and the same goes for Alex Coal. I've already explained my reasons before, so I won't repeat myself. Please don't try to misinterpret my intentions.

I brought it up again not to shame you or judge you, not even to blame you, but it just came in the context of "watching the scenes he already shot" (ALREADY = in past). I only care about those specific scenes and simply mentioned that I know you wouldn't mind watching them too. Not saying you should support any future productions of his, so please calm down!

I also didn't want to chime in, I didn't really care when SLR canceled his channel, that's totally their business, and TBH at this point it's totally understandable from them, I mean the girl mentioned the word "death" two times in the same day, and if something bad happened it could've been the end of SLR so taking a step back was a wise move. But when they locked the channel where he was telling his side of the story, I felt compelled to take a stance for what I believe is right. I've always stood by the principle of not silencing people, regardless of the situation.

I've stood up for similar things before on Reddit and this forum. See it for yourself here! I've even defended people who got banned for being too critical about passthrough production, despite being a passthrough supporter myself from the beginning. You can see it here

Freedom of speech is something I strongly believe in and will always support. People shouldn't be silenced, regardless who they are, especially in forums.

sylvan

[deleted] yes freedom of expression is very important even for those we cannot stand or who are accused of something (this is what happens in a court: the accused also has the right to speak)

« Previous Page